Favorite team:
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:14507
Registered on:8/8/2018
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message

re: The Official Trade Proposal Thread

Posted by Soggymoss on 5/28/24 at 9:23 pm
The problem lies in is that player available right now? What if that perfect fit player doesn’t shake loose until next offseason? Now you have Ingram on the roster who you basically were forced to pay a max deal to even though he doesn’t fit the team, and now you have a guy on a 5 year deal that wil...
Those words seem like he maybe throwing just a little shade at Dakorian :lol:...

re: The Official Trade Proposal Thread

Posted by Soggymoss on 5/28/24 at 4:20 pm
[quote]Wouldn't mind signing Malik Monk[/quote] Me neither, but where you shitting 25 million to match his other offers? [quote]doing a sign and trade B.I. for Nic Claxton and include another team to get a PG that can compete for the starting job[/quote] Horrible trade, unless Nets are getting us...
[embed]https://x.com/pelicansnba/status/1795555601725984887?s=46&t=kkXUall5cPHWDfIOc7u7_A[/embed]...
[quote]Herb should be untouchable.[/quote] Nahhh, you send Herb out if you have to to get a superstar The only truly untouchable player we have is Zion...
NIL offers from those other schools weren’t what he expected I bet...

re: The Official Trade Proposal Thread

Posted by Soggymoss on 5/28/24 at 12:49 pm
He is back dunking already, but I don’t see him being able to make a worthwhile comeback ...
[embed]https://x.com/jessecbrooks/status/1795496103036473801?s=46&t=kkXUall5cPHWDfIOc7u7_A[/embed] And no, it’s not a joke, Herb Jones has an official holiday in Louisiana!...

re: The Official Trade Proposal Thread

Posted by Soggymoss on 5/28/24 at 11:18 am
He’s also been cast as a #1 his entire career when he’s probably more suited as a high end 3-2. With a reduced role and being able to play more off ball it could likely help keep him healthy, at least long enough for another star to ask out then you send Lavine with the bulls picks and ours and g...

re: The Official Trade Proposal Thread

Posted by Soggymoss on 5/28/24 at 9:27 am
I mean, he played 77 games last season, 67 the season before. In fact he’s played the same exact amount of games the past 5 seasons as Ingram, and thats including this season where Lavine only played 25 games, so he really averages more games played a year than Ingram. The issue will be if you...

re: The Official Trade Proposal Thread

Posted by Soggymoss on 5/27/24 at 11:20 pm
[quote]ETA: the only picks that the Sixers can trade are their 2029 and 2031 and they have zero good players to trade, they should be a non-factor.[/quote] Umm, Philly will have up to 4 tradeable 1sts at the draft. #16 this year Either their pick or the lesser of OKC,Hou,Clips pick in 26 ...

re: The Official Trade Proposal Thread

Posted by Soggymoss on 5/27/24 at 8:11 pm
Latest Sam Amico article has 6ers, Hawks, Cavs and Magic as Ingram suitors so far....

re: The Official Trade Proposal Thread

Posted by Soggymoss on 5/27/24 at 8:05 pm
Would this trade move anyone? Bulls: Ingram, Nance Pels: Lavine, Caruso, 2025 Spurs 1st (top 8 protected), 2028 Bulls 1st Lavine can be a legit #2 next to Zion if he stays healthy, or we could do our best to keep him healthy to rehab his value and flip him at the deadline for another star. ...

re: The Official Trade Proposal Thread

Posted by Soggymoss on 5/27/24 at 5:53 pm
[quote]Seems if we want we trade for Trae and the Hawks can go flip BI for whatever assets or trade pieces they want.[/quote] No, the way it works is Atlanta would tell Griff go get me X,Y,Z using your assets and then we will trade Trae to you. They wouldn’t say we will take Ingram and then see wha...

re: The Official Trade Proposal Thread

Posted by Soggymoss on 5/27/24 at 5:03 pm
[quote]would likely have to be a 3-team deal or at least have second deal committed to at the same time[/quote] I mean, I figured with my wording that this was pretty obvious. You don’t do the deal if you don’t have the subsequent move already lined up....

re: The Official Trade Proposal Thread

Posted by Soggymoss on 5/27/24 at 4:10 pm
[quote]So we giving up a former all star level #2 or #3 option for Paul Reed and some draft picks that will be almost worthless since they will be so far down or years and years away when Zion won’t even be on the team by then?[/quote] Can you not read? I said it depends on what you can get with ...

re: The Official Trade Proposal Thread

Posted by Soggymoss on 5/27/24 at 3:38 pm
[quote]Sixers have nothing to offer, not sure why they are in the conversation.[/quote] Depends on what you can get with their draft picks, while taking in Paul Reed....

re: The Official Trade Proposal Thread

Posted by Soggymoss on 5/27/24 at 3:37 pm
[quote]A pretty solid big on a $22 million expiring has no value whatsoever?[/quote] Capella has zero offensive ability. He has at best neutral value, meaning Atlanta wouldn’t have to pay to move him, but teams also won’t have to give up any assets to acquire him....

re: The Official Trade Proposal Thread

Posted by Soggymoss on 5/27/24 at 1:57 pm
[quote]What do you do with Hawkins?[/quote] What you mean? You give him minutes playing off the bench also. You need more than one guard coming off your bench. The lineup would look something like Trae/CJ/Jose Herb/Hawk Trey/Dyson Zion/Naji/EJ FA/FA/Karlo ...

re: The Official Trade Proposal Thread

Posted by Soggymoss on 5/27/24 at 1:46 pm
I don’t see Capella as having any value whatsoever, he’s in the deal because we agree to take him back when Atlanta takes Nance, as Capella’s 22 million salary number allows us to go after bigger fish than Nance at 12 million, otherwise we keep Nance and only send one pick with one future protected ...