- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Wednesday
| Favorite team: | LSU  |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | Queen of one Day |
| Number of Posts: | 15491 |
| Registered on: | 8/15/2017 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: Levin suggests common law writs to SCOTUS - I agree this would be the best option if avail
Posted by Wednesday on 5/31/24 at 8:32 am
I think you are correct. It also had not made it out of the state appeals process (which is the normal course).
They took it on some kind of extraordinary writ powers.
They can and should exercise those here if there’s any chance of restoring integrity to the judicial system ...
1
re: Ari Fleischer says get ready
Posted by Wednesday on 5/31/24 at 8:30 am
[quote]At this point, I’d be absolutely shocked if he doesn’t.[/quote]
Same. Merchan has utterly disgraced himself, the robe and the legal profession.
He’s a walking constitutional atrocity....
re: Levin suggests common law writs to SCOTUS - I agree this would be the best option if avail
Posted by Wednesday on 5/31/24 at 7:43 am
1-the jury convicted Trump for something someone else pled guilty to. That’s really awesome and fair and respects due process.
2-the state of New York has no subject matter jurisdictionto punish a criminal defendant for a violation of federal law, which is what Cohen pled guilty to. IOW, the j...
re: Levin suggests common law writs to SCOTUS - I agree this would be the best option if avail
Posted by Wednesday on 5/30/24 at 9:32 pm
[quote]I know that you’re aware that SCOTUS doesn’t issue advisory opinions or hear hypothetical cases.[/quote]
True. But courts can declare rights that are uncertain. And well- Trump’s rights/ powers as president are rendered uncertain.
We agreed earlier, that the sentence eliminates the hy...
re: Levin suggests common law writs to SCOTUS - I agree this would be the best option if avail
Posted by Wednesday on 5/30/24 at 9:16 pm
Deal...
re: Levin suggests common law writs to SCOTUS - I agree this would be the best option if avail
Posted by Wednesday on 5/30/24 at 9:13 pm
[quote]What I need someone to articulate, and I haven’t seen it yet, is the why.[/quote]
Because if he wins, and the conviction (which ain’t final till last appeal delays run) becomes final while he is a sitting president, what happens exactly?...
re: Levin suggests common law writs to SCOTUS - I agree this would be the best option if avail
Posted by Wednesday on 5/30/24 at 9:11 pm
[quote]what is the constitutional crisis?[/quote]
The state of New York sentencing a presidential candidate during a presidential campaign based on a federal felony over which the state of New York has no subject matter jurisdiction, and about which the criminal defendant had no notice, even afte...
re: Levin suggests common law writs to SCOTUS - I agree this would be the best option if avail
Posted by Wednesday on 5/30/24 at 8:47 pm
Ok Alvin. Calm down. I’m sure there’s no remedy for your fake judgment.
Regardless. The party in a hurry was the prosecution. The prosecution doesn’t have due process rights. And further a NY court lacks the subject matter jurisdiction to determine federal election decisions. So there’s that...
re: Levin suggests common law writs to SCOTUS - I agree this would be the best option if avail
Posted by Wednesday on 5/30/24 at 8:30 pm
1- Jamie Raskin will be along in a minute to intoduce legislation that says a conviction will disqualify him and we have to trust the dipshits in the House of Representatives to vote no- so if that happens - definite immediate review
2- the Jack Smith case was pending in the Federal System and t...
re: Levin suggests common law writs to SCOTUS - I agree this would be the best option if avail
Posted by Wednesday on 5/30/24 at 8:17 pm
[quote]Bush v Gore covers this in detail, just FYI[/quote]
You mean in Bush v Gore where serious constitutional crisis arose in the middle of a fricking presidential election AND THE SUPREME COURT DECIDED TO EXERCISE JURISDICTION BEFORE THE MATTER WAS DETERMINED ON THE FINAL STATE COURT APPEAL?
...
re: Levin suggests common law writs to SCOTUS - I agree this would be the best option if avail
Posted by Wednesday on 5/30/24 at 8:16 pm
Isn’t Pennsylvania in the second circuit? I know This is NY - but he had control of whether the writ was considered in the PA fake ballots cases before the election ...
re: Levin suggests common law writs to SCOTUS - I agree this would be the best option if avail
Posted by Wednesday on 5/30/24 at 8:15 pm
SCOTUS Blog begs to differ . . .
(I am not pretending to be some expert SCOTUS litigator. I’ve filed 2 writ applications there ever).
Here’s Scotus blog’s take:
[quote]But neither Article III of the Constitution nor many of the Supreme Court’s jurisdictional statutes require it to wait f...
re: Levin suggests common law writs to SCOTUS - I agree this would be the best option if avail
Posted by Wednesday on 5/30/24 at 8:10 pm
No they would have to submit a writ and I think the judge over the second circuit would decide whether to present . . . Which I think is Alitio :lol:
Thereafter they would have to vote on whether to consider ...
re: Levin suggests common law writs to SCOTUS - I agree this would be the best option if avail
Posted by Wednesday on 5/30/24 at 8:07 pm
You’re right Bucky.
I do no criminal law whatsoever- but (at least according to Levin) there are extraordinary circumstances where the SCOTUS will hear something immediately. I’m not sure it’s applications in criminal circumstances, but if this ain’t a break glass moment, I’m not sure what is...
re: Levin suggests common law writs to SCOTUS - I agree this would be the best option if avail
Posted by Wednesday on 5/30/24 at 7:55 pm
The judge’s conduct of the entire trial was outrageous.
It went far beyond his daughter being some fundraiser.
There were fundamental flaws in his decisions that could only have been made to leave the jurors no other choice but to convict. It was a constitutional atrocity, and the judge knew...
re: Levin suggests common law writs to SCOTUS - I agree this would be the best option if avail
Posted by Wednesday on 5/30/24 at 7:42 pm
I’m sure he will, and will find some dumb basis based on his extensive knowledge of defending DWIs why a novel constitutional crisis is just another day at the office :lol:...
Levin suggests common law writs to SCOTUS - I agree this would be the best option if avail
Posted by Wednesday on 5/30/24 at 7:40 pm
I was pondering whether this may be possible driving home from my office right after I got my Twitter account placed on “read only” mode for telling one of the Krassestein worms to “frick off. I hope you choke on your kool aid” after whichever worm it was started pontificating the democrat propagand...
re: Is anyone else ashamed to be an American today?
Posted by Wednesday on 5/30/24 at 7:22 pm
Not ashamed to be an American, ever.
The bullshite that happened in NY today is the antithesis of what it means to be an American. The judge and the prosecutors don’t deserve to call themselves Americans.
Hell if that judge was actually born in Columbia- let’s go ahead and deport him. ...
re: Update: Trump verdict is in...GUILTY
Posted by Wednesday on 5/30/24 at 6:26 pm
This is disgusting...
re: Jury sends 2nd request re: juror instructions
Posted by Wednesday on 5/29/24 at 7:23 pm
No. I’ve never tried a case where the judge didn’t give them the written instructions.
...
Popular
40
