Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Landry Is No Conservative

Posted on 5/15/24 at 10:37 pm
Posted by CitizenK
BR
Member since Aug 2019
9662 posts
Posted on 5/15/24 at 10:37 pm
Your insurance rates aren't coming down anytime soon. Landry told his financial backers, trial lawyers, so. The same financial backers of JBE.

LINK
Posted by Errerrerrwere
Member since Aug 2015
38427 posts
Posted on 5/15/24 at 10:38 pm to
Thanks, shite lib!
Posted by Riverside
Member since Jul 2022
2461 posts
Posted on 5/15/24 at 10:39 pm to
Tort reform isn’t dead. The people who elected Landry are conservatives he can’t afford to alienate his base. The people want and need tort reform in this state.
Posted by ChatGPT of LA
Member since Mar 2023
378 posts
Posted on 5/15/24 at 10:41 pm to
insurance rated mean he's liberal?

WTF? This might be the worst post I've ever read on the board
This post was edited on 5/16/24 at 5:26 am
Posted by Riverside
Member since Jul 2022
2461 posts
Posted on 5/15/24 at 10:48 pm to
OP’s point is partially true. Landry is a social conservative but not on business/small government issues. What OP—and many on this board—aren’t getting is that Landry needs the conservatives on his side to win again. People need to let their State Senators know they want the Insurance Commissioner’s tort reform package passed. You baws in Norco need to let your Senator Miller know you want tort reform. The Senate is the problem and if a grassroots movement gets activated, the tort reform package can still make it to the Gov. IF it gets to the Gov, then he will be in a position where he can’t veto the package without destroying his coalition.
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80441 posts
Posted on 5/15/24 at 10:49 pm to
My favorite thing this Session is learning Melerine filed suit against his UM carrier alleging bad faith for not paying his claim. I believe his wife also filed a consortium claim. Who was his lawyer? Alan Seabaugh
This post was edited on 5/15/24 at 10:50 pm
Posted by Riverside
Member since Jul 2022
2461 posts
Posted on 5/15/24 at 10:51 pm to
Always smearing the good guys
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80441 posts
Posted on 5/15/24 at 10:53 pm to
Eh, the truth on tort reform is somewhere in between Gordon McKernan and Alan Seabaugh.
Posted by Riverside
Member since Jul 2022
2461 posts
Posted on 5/15/24 at 10:59 pm to
Temple’s package is the middle ground. I’d like to see it go even further.
Posted by CitizenK
BR
Member since Aug 2019
9662 posts
Posted on 5/15/24 at 11:03 pm to
quote:

OP’s point is partially true. Landry


Landry has always been for whatever gets him financial backing. This is no different than while a congress critter, his USCG Reauth amendment that would have caused already producing oil and gas fields offshore to be shutdown before they needed to be and still making money. It would have made a shiite pile of money for Chouest, Danos, etc... invested in workboats. It's why the Laffy oil companies flipped and backed Boustany for the re-election. Boustany had it pulled in conference committee as it wasn't in the senate version of the bill.
This post was edited on 5/15/24 at 11:05 pm
Posted by BigJim
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2010
14519 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 12:00 am to
quote:

Tort reform isn’t dead.


A lot of bills that will affect property and casualty passed.

Auto...not so much.

Still, advances were made.
Posted by BigJim
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2010
14519 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 12:03 am to
quote:

OP’s point is partially true. Landry is a social conservative but not on business/small government issues. What OP—and many on this board—aren’t getting is that Landry needs the conservatives on his side to win again. People need to let their State Senators know they want the Insurance Commissioner’s tort reform package passed. You baws in Norco need to let your Senator Miller know you want tort reform. The Senate is the problem and if a grassroots movement gets activated, the tort reform package can still make it to the Gov. IF it gets to the Gov, then he will be in a position where he can’t veto the package without destroying his coalition.


Yeah, I don't think you get how this game is being played.

Miller can kill selected tort bills because of the composition of the committee.

Cameron Henry set the composition of the committee.

Landry told him to set up the committee so select bills could be killed while others passed.

What happened was all according to plan. Complaining to Miller isn't going to fix it.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram