Started By
Message

re: NC Senate votes to ban wearing mask in public

Posted on 5/16/24 at 6:20 pm to
Posted by St Augustine
The Pauper of the Surf
Member since Mar 2006
64442 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 6:20 pm to
quote:

Agreed but how do you balance safety of citizenry with the constitution. What happens when they want to ban people from wearing running shoes? Or having a wallet?


There is no balance. There is the constitution. It’s not a suggestion.
Posted by Lsutigerturner
Member since Dec 2016
5838 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 6:22 pm to
I don’t think they can do that other then give stores the right to demand no masks in buildings, at least cloth masks business should be able to deny service
Posted by Stamps74
Member since Nov 2017
631 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 6:31 pm to
Again some are all about yelling Freedom, but only if they agree with it.
Posted by fwtex
Member since Nov 2019
1985 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 6:49 pm to
Republicans find a way to screw up everything that should be so simple. Instead of making the law against mask in public, they should have just made it a law against wearing a mask during the public protest, civil disobedience, or in the course of any other misdemeanor or felony crime.

Very simple and you no longer have to infringement upon people that are sick or walk around scared of their own shadows.
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
72216 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 6:59 pm to
quote:

I recall businesses but cities doesn’t ring a particular bell. Admittedly not something I ever much paid attention to but don’t recall it
There was a multitude of cities and states that passed ordinances against masking, largely related to groups such as the KKK.

No one cared then.
Posted by JasonDBlaha
Woodlands, Texas
Member since Apr 2023
2448 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 7:01 pm to
Considering how masking has been proven to reduce spread and transmission of COVID, this is pretty ridiculous.
Posted by nctiger71
North Carolina
Member since Oct 2017
1328 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 7:02 pm to
This law has been on the books since 1953. It was exempt from enforcement during COVID, for obvious reason. The exemption from enforcement has been removed, as I understand it, but there were 6 exemptions to the law; holiday mask, workers needing mask, etc.

One of the exemptions to the 1953 law is:
§ 14-12.11. Exemptions from provisions of Article.
(6) Any person wearing a mask for the purpose of ensuring the physical health or safety of the wearer or others.
The Senate voted to remove this exemption. The House has not voted. There are also provisions in the new law that addresses people that sit on highways and block traffic.

These are the main parts of the 1953 law.
§ 14-12.7. Wearing of masks, hoods, etc., on public ways.
No person or persons at least 16 years of age shall, while wearing any mask, hood or device whereby the person, face or voice is disguised so as to conceal the identity of the wearer, enter, be or appear upon any lane, walkway, alley, street, road, highway or other public way in this State. (1953, c. 1193, s. 6; 1983, c. 175, ss. 1, 10; c. 720, s. 4.)

§ 14-12.8. Wearing of masks, hoods, etc., on public property.
No person or persons shall in this State, while wearing any mask........so as to conceal the identity of the wearer, enter, or appear upon or within the public property of any municipality or county of the State, or of the State of North Carolina. (1953, c. 1193, s. 7.)

§ 14-12.9. Entry, etc., upon premises of another while wearing mask, hood or other disguise. No person or persons at least 16 years of age shall, while wearing a mask.............demand entrance or admission, enter or come upon or into, or be upon or in the premises, enclosure or house of any other person in any municipality or county of this State. (1953, c. 1193, s. 8; 1983, c. 175, ss. 2, 10; c. 720, s. 4.)

§ 14-12.10. Holding meetings or demonstrations while wearing masks, hoods, etc. No person or persons at least 16 years of age shall while wearing a mask, ...........hold any manner of meeting, or make any demonstration upon the private property of another unless such person or persons shall first obtain from the owner or occupier of the property his or her written permission to do so................ (1953, c. 1193, s. 9; 1983, c. 175, ss. 3, 10; c. 720, s. 4.)

NC House Bill 237 Unmasking Mobs and Criminals
This is a link to the new law.
This post was edited on 5/16/24 at 7:09 pm
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
72216 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 7:04 pm to
quote:

This law has been on the books since 1953.
Exactly.
Posted by Krane
Member since Oct 2017
972 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 7:05 pm to
quote:

TBoy


Don’t you mask up to pick up your kid from your wife’s boyfriend’s house
Posted by Grigio
Member since May 2023
616 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 8:21 pm to
According to your link wearing masks in public was illegal prior to covid and there was never a single person arrested for wearing a mask at Walmart.

Sounds like this bill is targeting black supremacists who burn down buildings, cosplaying fedbois, and those who want to exterminate the Jews.
Posted by Porpus
Covington, LA
Member since Aug 2022
1676 posts
Posted on 5/17/24 at 8:55 am to
quote:

I mean frick masking and all that but this seems just a little fricking unconstitutional



Which part of the U.S. Constitution do you think a mask ban would contravene?
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram