Started By
Message

re: Magic are the betting favorite to land Brandon Ingram

Posted on 5/14/24 at 2:00 pm to
Posted by Soggymoss
Member since Aug 2018
14507 posts
Posted on 5/14/24 at 2:00 pm to
quote:

I would lose my shite if Griffin did this. Holy late-lottery purgatory, Batman!

Lottery purgatory?

We would be a better team than last season.
Trae/CJ/Jose
Dyson/Hawk
Trey/Ryan
Zion/JSJ
Capella/Nance

How you can possibly think that’s a team worse than last seasons is insane
Posted by Soggymoss
Member since Aug 2018
14507 posts
Posted on 5/14/24 at 2:01 pm to
quote:

but Suggs is not a great fit here.

Care to elaborate why?

If Pels lose Herb, Suggs is as close of a clone as you can get. He was 10th in DPOY voting, shoots the 3 at 40% on 5 apg, and is only 22 years old.
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
25823 posts
Posted on 5/14/24 at 2:11 pm to
quote:

Care to elaborate why?


Who cares about his fit?
he’s no where near the caliber of player as BI, or even Dejounte Murray.
You don’t trade BI for a couple of role players who won’t even start for you.
It’s a stupid trade that makes us worse.

quote:

If Pels lose Herb,


Why are we losing Herb?
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
96456 posts
Posted on 5/14/24 at 2:22 pm to
quote:

Why are we losing Herb?


Dumbasses keep insisting that he be included in trades.

I would say Herb is probably one of the most untouchable players on our roster short of a major upgrade at our 2nd player we can’t pass up. And that wouldn’t be most of the offers we have seen floated as of now.
Posted by Pels_Yaz
Member since Apr 2023
9120 posts
Posted on 5/14/24 at 2:24 pm to
quote:

Dumbasses keep insisting that he be included in trades.


Theres this assumption Atlanta would only do trades with us if Herb was included. That was true at the deadline but I’m not sure that would still apply to any trade with ATL now. It seems like the team is going full rebuild and may not even prefer Herb.
Posted by Soggymoss
Member since Aug 2018
14507 posts
Posted on 5/14/24 at 2:26 pm to
quote:

Why are we losing Herb?


One trade I floated before

Magic: Ingram, Capella

Hawks: Herb, Nance

Pels: Trae, WCJ, Suggs, Mo Wagner

Adding picks where needed

You replace BI with Trae, get a younger Herb back in Suggs, starting C in WCJ and very good backup C in Wagner.

You lose Herb, but don’t have a downgrade overall by acquiring Suggs. There are trades where you trade Herb to upgrade #2 spot, but still don’t really downgrade Herbs spot.

Now in this scenario Atlanta may prefer Suggs over Herb if they’re going full rebuild, in which case you keep Herb
This post was edited on 5/14/24 at 2:28 pm
Posted by CP3forMVP
Member since Nov 2010
14950 posts
Posted on 5/14/24 at 2:39 pm to
quote:

If Pels lose Herb, Suggs is as close of a clone as you can get. He was 10th in DPOY voting, shoots the 3 at 40% on 5 apg, and is only 22 years old.


I think Herb is the better defender, but Suggs is the better offensive player. When you watch that guy play he's got some stuff in the tank that the Magic didn't ask him to use. There's no reason he can't be a 16-18 ppg scorer.
Posted by Soggymoss
Member since Aug 2018
14507 posts
Posted on 5/14/24 at 3:18 pm to
quote:

I think Herb is the better defender, but Suggs is the better offensive player.

Exactly, Suggs is a step below Herb defensively, but a step above offensively. Everyone turning their nose up at him are looking no further than his rookie season and thinking he’s a bust
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
25823 posts
Posted on 5/14/24 at 3:30 pm to
quote:

veryone turning their nose up at him are looking no further than his rookie season and thinking he’s a bust


Not once did I say he was a bad player.
But he cannot be the centerpiece of a BI trade. That’s a laughably bad centerpiece.
And if he’s so like Herb then send him to ATL instead of Herb.
There’s a huge difference in size and length between Suggs and Herb.
6’4” vs 6’8” in height.
6’6” vs 7’ in wingspan.
I’m not swapping Herb for Suggs. It makes no sense to unless the BI upgrade is well worth it and requires Herb. I don’t think Trae fits that bill where I have to give up Herb.
Send BI and Herb to Phx for Booker and then I’ll have interest in Suggs.
Posted by Soggymoss
Member since Aug 2018
14507 posts
Posted on 5/14/24 at 3:39 pm to
Trae>>>>>BI for this team

To get great players you have to give up multiple good players. You can also get good players back in other trades.

Suggs is not the centerpiece of the BI trade I proposed, it’s Trae. BI is sent out to make the salary work. Hawks get Herb, 41 million in salary relief, and picks.

Now, as stated if they decide for a full on rebuild then Suggs would make more sense for them over Herb due to age, which in that case you send Suggs and keep Herb.
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
25823 posts
Posted on 5/14/24 at 3:47 pm to
And I’m not trading for Trae without having Herb next to him starting. Simple as that. If Suggs is so great he can go to ATL instead.
Posted by Soggymoss
Member since Aug 2018
14507 posts
Posted on 5/14/24 at 3:48 pm to
Geez y'all have a hard time reading I see

Besides until Atlanta makes a decision on what direction they are going all the hypothetical trades are just gauging value. They might prioritize draft picks over anything else, which we can do also
This post was edited on 5/14/24 at 3:51 pm
Posted by Chalkywhite84
New orleans
Member since Dec 2016
27323 posts
Posted on 5/15/24 at 3:04 pm to
quote:

They have 12 guys under contract and are $8m below the tax. And they could probably flip Capela and Bogdan for cap relief if needed.


Bogdan would be a nice piece to get back in an Atlanta trade.

Give me oo, trae, and bogdan
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
25823 posts
Posted on 5/15/24 at 3:31 pm to
quote:

Bogdan would be a nice piece to get back in an Atlanta trade.




Think about the pieces we already have.

I think people are forgetting what we currently have.

Our starters our
CJ
Herb
BI
Zion
Center

We need a 5 obviously, and we need a scorer to replace BI.
After that we still have:
Trey - needs to start, which means BI and CJ both need to be traded or he won't start.
Jose - a great backup PG that we shouldn't trade.
Dyson - top 10 draft pick going into his 3rd year who's already one of the best defenders in the league, made improvements with his floater and corner 3's and plays position 1-3
Hawkins - backup SG that should be able to take Trey's role off the bench and shoot 3's at will
Naji - the kind of multi tool every team needs as their 10th guy. Will need a new contract. I could see us deciding between Naji and Dyson.
Larry - Still a good backup 5 in the league, but I'm sure most of us want to upgrade him.
#21 pick - somoene who hopefully can earn minutes.


So if we were to trade both CJ and BI, we still have 4-6 guys on the bench that need minutes, unless we are trading them as well.



Don't ask for ATL to throw in Bogdan unless you are ready to give up on Hawkins and trade him.
Do'nt ask for Suggs unless you are ok with losing Herb for some dumbass reason. Herb isn't for sale unless it means we are combining him with BI and getting back a legit top 10-15 player in the league. If you want Suggs to replace Dyson, then so be it.



We have a good team right now, with a lot of guys that deserve minutes.
WE DON'T NEED MORE ROLE PLAYERS THAT WILL COMPETE WITH JOSE/HAWKINS/DYSON/NAJI IN A BI TRADE.

We need Trey to take BI's spot, a new center, AND MOST IMPORTANTLY A SCORER TO TAKE BI'S SKILLSET THAT'S LEAVING.
The only role players we should be looking for are backup 4 and 5 that can shoot.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
111155 posts
Posted on 5/15/24 at 3:39 pm to
quote:

Think about the pieces we already have.
If we're truly trying to win now, there are bench positions that can use upgrades.

Bogdan taking Dyson's minutes is a sizable upgrade just in terms of overall player.

Bogdan taking Hawkins minutes is also a massive upgrade.


I get it, they're young dudes with potential, no issues there. But if we're trying to win now, Bogdan would take 1 of their spots, and they could go in a different deal or as part of a deal for a different piece.
quote:

WE DON'T NEED MORE ROLE PLAYERS THAT WILL COMPETE WITH JOSE/HAWKINS/DYSON/NAJI IN A BI TRADE.
Are we title contenders once we trade BI?

No, so yes, we do need upgrades to role players.
This post was edited on 5/15/24 at 3:40 pm
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
96456 posts
Posted on 5/15/24 at 3:41 pm to
From a cost perspective alone, getting any pieces past Trae mean sending out more money.

Trae, Ogonkwu, and Bogdan combined make about $70m.

That is equal to BI, CJ, and Nance given our available salaries, as most other big salaries are untouchable or too small to make a difference here.
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
25823 posts
Posted on 5/15/24 at 3:45 pm to
and i get the salary aspect of it, but we have no use for Bogdan, and i like that guy.
If he's needed for salary purposes, then he needs to be rerouted somewhere else for a piece we actually need, like a backup 4 or 5
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
25823 posts
Posted on 5/15/24 at 3:51 pm to
quote:

Are we title contenders once we trade BI?



If we don't get back the ONE piece needed to get us there, then what the hell is the point of trading him? We just gonna build a team of role players and hope Zion turns into one of the top 10 players to ever play the game?

If we don't get to that championship contender in the next 3 years, Zion is asking for a trade.


We have too many assets to not shoot for the stars right here. We've been hoarding all these picks (the ones our idiot GM hasn't had to give away) and young players for what? to hold onto them longer? We got this "haul" for AD and Jrue and what do we have to show for it?
BUILD A CHAMPIONSHIP CONTENDER NOW!
and that doesn't mean we have to make the finals next year, as i woudln't expect that no matter who we get, but if we don't come out of this trade with a team that is an obvious 2nd round playoff team with potential for more in the future, then what the frick are we doing?
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
111155 posts
Posted on 5/15/24 at 4:00 pm to
quote:

If we don't get back the ONE piece needed to get us there, then what the hell is the point of trading him?
I'm talking about in addition to trading Ingram.

IF we trade BI for Murray or Trae or whoever and add a 5 and have 10-11 pieces, I don't think we can then say, "welp, we have an 11 man rotation, we're good to go."

If either in the BI deal or subsequent deals, if you can improve other spots in the rotation, it is at the very least worth exploring. You may think Bogdan is better than Dyson or Hawkins not but not worth it due to money and/or potential of the other 2, that's fine. But it's also a fair argument that a Bogdan type is absolutely better than some of our rotation dudes so we should at least consider those types of dudes to to take the place of lesser players, even if they are younger dudes we think have potential.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
96456 posts
Posted on 5/15/24 at 4:25 pm to
It comes down to our perceived window of contention and how much of an upgrade someone like Bogdan would be over Hawkins, Dyson, or both given they make less than him and are under team control for longer.


Bogdan is a decent win now move but I don’t think he is the piece I would trade our young guys for.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram