Started By
Message

re: Jack Smith and His DOJ Comrades are Staring at and Accused of Evidence Tampering

Posted on 5/4/24 at 8:09 pm to
Posted by boomtown143
Merica
Member since May 2019
6726 posts
Posted on 5/4/24 at 8:09 pm to
Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14237 posts
Posted on 5/4/24 at 8:25 pm to
quote:

If this had occurred 40-50 years ago the case is over,

You ae dreaming a bad dream. No way the case would be dismissed.
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
73491 posts
Posted on 5/4/24 at 8:30 pm to
DixRider to the rescue!
Posted by prplhze2000
Parts Unknown
Member since Jan 2007
51516 posts
Posted on 5/4/24 at 8:30 pm to
Harmless error.

You watch.
Posted by SWCBonfire
South Texas
Member since Aug 2011
1272 posts
Posted on 5/4/24 at 8:38 pm to
I feel somehow, some way that the Mail Robot from The Americans is behind this.

Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14237 posts
Posted on 5/4/24 at 10:32 pm to
quote:

DixRider to the rescue!

Jbird showing off his bird brain yet again.
Posted by TDTOM
Member since Jan 2021
14954 posts
Posted on 5/4/24 at 10:33 pm to
quote:

I’ve got about 100 things to do other than pay attention to Tom Fitton’s nonsense on X.


Was one of them posting here? You sound like a very busy person.
Posted by This GUN for HIRE
Member since May 2022
3008 posts
Posted on 5/5/24 at 2:48 am to
quote:

KiwiHead


Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
48781 posts
Posted on 5/5/24 at 5:05 am to
quote:

You ae dreaming a bad dream. No way the case would be dismissed.


How would you know? You have zero legal education.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
48781 posts
Posted on 5/5/24 at 5:07 am to
quote:

It's still the case that leaves Trump with the greatest legal exposure


Nah. There are so many issues here. Even if Trump did anything wrong, which is unlikely…the actions of the DOJ poisoned it all. Sorry kiwi. He isn’t going to jail.
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
39606 posts
Posted on 5/5/24 at 5:11 am to
quote:

You ae dreaming a bad dream. No way the case would’ve been brought


Fify. And you know it
Posted by cadillacattack
the ATL
Member since May 2020
4500 posts
Posted on 5/5/24 at 7:08 am to

Posted by idlewatcher
County Jail
Member since Jan 2012
79390 posts
Posted on 5/5/24 at 7:26 am to
quote:

The investigative team used classified cover sheets for that purpose, until the FBI ran out because there were so many classified documents, at which point the team began using blank sheets with handwritten notes indicating the classification level of the document(s) seized,” the prosecutors wrote.


Imagine these are the people who are supposed to “protect” this country
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124273 posts
Posted on 5/5/24 at 8:28 am to
quote:

If this had occurred 40-50 years ago the case is over,

You ae dreaming a bad dream. No way the case would be dismissed.
Dumb! Really dumb. In fact, there is no need to speculate, correct?

The DOJ faced the exact issue, albeit in more egregious instances, both in 2016 and 2024. In 2016, they said no reasonable prosecutor would pursue such charges. In 2024 they essentially said the same thing, citing mental infirmity as a further excuse. The difference in the Trump case is he had the authority to declassify documents in question. Neither Hillary nor Biden did.
Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14237 posts
Posted on 5/6/24 at 10:07 pm to
quote:

How would you know? You have zero legal education.
You're an aswipe and a drooling idiot

GFY.
Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14237 posts
Posted on 5/6/24 at 10:10 pm to
quote:

You ae dreaming a bad dream. No way the case would’ve been brought

Better chance of that being true than the case being dismissed at this point.
Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14237 posts
Posted on 5/6/24 at 10:29 pm to
quote:

Dumb! Really dumb. In fact, there is no need to speculate, correct?
The DOJ faced the exact issue, albeit in more egregious instances, both in 2016 and 2024. In 2016, they said no reasonable prosecutor would pursue such charges. In 2024 they essentially said the same thing, citing mental infirmity as a further excuse. The difference in the Trump case is he had the authority to declassify documents in question. Neither Hillary nor Biden did.

As usual, you post something that misses the point.

I was responding to an assertion that the case would be dismissed at this point based on the DOJ's handling of documents produced in discovery.

Your response brings up the issue of whether the case should have been brought- missing my point entirely.

And Trump having the authority to declassify the documents and actually having declassified the documents are two different things. You TRump dolts somehow are unable (or unwilling) to distinguish the difference.
Posted by jbdawgs03
Athens
Member since Oct 2017
9757 posts
Posted on 5/7/24 at 5:17 am to
quote:

Are you a foreigner?


No he’s a deranged Ronbot
Posted by riverdiver
Summerville SC
Member since May 2022
1275 posts
Posted on 5/7/24 at 5:33 am to
quote:

Yep, admitted to it and allowed for a search of his premises and Penn Center without DoJ officially asking. Big difference.


Biden had documents going back to the 70’s, documents he never should’ve had to begin with.

Weren’t his lawyers the ones who searched for, and found the documents?

Out of the blue? Just like that? After having Trump raided?

Sounds like a case of his group hearing rumblings about a whistleblower, and they got on top of the situation before it leaked.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124273 posts
Posted on 5/7/24 at 6:00 am to
quote:

It's one thing to have uncovered documents in your possession and alerting the DoJ to the fact. It's another thing to ostensibly comply with a subpoena, say you have turned over documents and then have it uncovered that you knew you did not turn them all over and then by omitting that force another person , namely your lawyer to then attest to something that you know to be mostly to patently untrue. .
You take multiple liberties with assumptions there, none of which may be true
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram