Started By
Message

WSJ: In America’s Biggest Oil Field, the Ground Is Swelling and Buckling

Posted on 5/3/24 at 7:52 am
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
21457 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 7:52 am
quote:

In a desolate stretch of desert spanning West Texas and New Mexico, drillers are pumping more crude than Kuwait. The oil production is so frenzied that huge swaths of land are literally sinking and heaving.

The land has subsided by as much as 11 inches since 2015 in a prime portion of the Permian Basin, as drillers extract huge amounts of oil and water, according to a Wall Street Journal analysis of satellite data. In other areas where drillers dispose of wastewater in underground wells, the land has lifted by as much as 5 inches over the same period.

The constant extraction and injection of liquids has wrought complex geologic changes, which are raising concerns among local communities long supportive of oil and gas. Earthquakes linked to water disposal have rattled residents and prompted state regulators to step in. Some researchers worry that wastewater might end up contaminating scarce drinking-water supplies.

“They’re affecting the geology of the ground, the surface,” Ty Edwards, a Pecos County, Texas, resident who helps manage groundwater in the region, said of oil producers. “That is pretty wild.”

The tumultuous landscape is a direct result of industrial-scale drilling in the Delaware portion of the Permian Basin. Oil production has reached nearly three million barrels of oil a day there, cementing the U.S.’s status as an energy power and fueling the region’s economic engine.

Alongside crude, oil-and-gas companies are extracting gargantuan amounts of subterranean water—in the Delaware, between five and six barrels of water are produced, on average, for every barrel of oil. To dispose of it, they inject billions of barrels of putrid wastewater into underground disposal wells.


quote:

Environmental groups say Texas regulators’ oversight of the industry is falling short and that it is time for the federal government to intervene.

Oil executives, meanwhile, say the issue of water disposal is having an impact on their bottom line, driving up the costs for new wells. They also fear that, if left unmanaged, it could dent local support for their activities.

“Produced water management is probably one of the, if not the biggest, challenge in the Permian,” said Cody Comiskey, an earth-science adviser at Chevron.


quote:

When the shale boom breathed new air into the Delaware about 10 years ago, the basin produced under 500,000 barrels of oil a day, according to analytics firm Enverus. Today, companies there churn out roughly a quarter of all U.S. crude production.

As a result, the volume of briny, polluted water that companies have to handle has skyrocketed. In 2013, companies discarded about 382 million barrels of water, according to water analytics firm B3 Insight. Last year, they injected about 3.4 billion barrels of water down disposal wells. That is about as much water as New York City consumes in roughly five months.

Frackers inject most of this water down wells that reach about a mile under the surface, which is convenient and relatively cheap. Drilling clusters of injection wells means companies don’t have to build expensive pipelines to link disposal sites together. But concentrated volumes of water increase pressure underground, which then makes it more difficult for companies to drill down through those levels to shale rocks.

Companies are having to make significant adjustments because of the pressure changes. Occidental Petroleum, for instance, is building more robust wells to account for increased pressure, said Jeff Simmons, the company’s chief petrotechnical officer. One way Occidental is making wells sturdier is by adding strings of casing to reinforce the wells’ structure.


quote:

Companies have also been injecting a smaller portion of the unwanted water well below crude reservoirs, at deeper depths of around 3 miles. Deep injection wells are much more expensive than shallow ones, but they allow frackers to dump more water and do so in a way that doesn’t affect subsequent drilling. But there is a catch: The water can cause deep-rooted faults to slip, creating earthquakes.

The number of earthquakes in the Permian with magnitudes greater than 2.5 jumped from 42 in 2017 to 671 in 2022, according to B3 Insight. In late 2022, a 5.4-magnitude earthquake in Reeves County, Texas, sent tremors felt as far as Dallas, El Paso and San Antonio, where it damaged a historical building.

Texas regulators have imposed restrictions on injection volumes in the region, and the number of magnitude-3.5 earthquakes and higher has come down. Local communities are gearing up for more shakes. In Pecos City, a city of about 13,000 in West Texas, around 145 municipal employees will receive earthquake-preparedness training, said City Manager Charles Lino.

“That is the necessity we have to live with,” he said.

Drillers said they are allocating more cash and brain power to navigate pressure and seismicity issues. Chevron has formalized a team with a budget that conducts reservoir studies and looks at ways to reuse more wastewater, among other things, said Chevron’s Comiskey.


quote:

Advocacy groups have asked the federal government to review how the state is regulating water injection in the region. The Environmental Protection Agency has said it would review the groups’ petition.

With shrinking options to discard wastewater, crude producers have to get creative. Some are looking for lower-risk formations to inject water into and ways to treat water so it can be reused for agriculture. Whether these efforts will pass regulatory muster or how much they will cost remains unclear.

“There’s just no silver bullet,” Comiskey said.


LINK

Maybe it's just me, but I hate when media uses the term "Frackers" to refer to oil & gas companies operating in shale plays. That personal problem aside...

This is probably the largest issue for industry in the Permian Basin right now. Getting the oil out the ground is easy, and there's lots of it. But there's also a shite ton of saltwater, as the Permian used to be an ocean. That water has to be dealt with.
Posted by LSU Grad Alabama Fan
369 Cardboard Box Lane
Member since Nov 2019
10360 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 7:53 am to
Posted by tiggerthetooth
Big Momma's House
Member since Oct 2010
61413 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 7:59 am to
quote:

Maybe it's just me, but I hate when media uses the term "Frackers" to refer to oil & gas companies operating in shale plays. That personal problem aside...



Because they want all oil/gas activity to seem deviant to their hyper-sensitvie urban readers. They want to make oil/gas folks seem like complete earth-destroying monsters.
Posted by LegendInMyMind
Member since Apr 2019
55007 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 8:34 am to
Can someone answer a question:

What, if any, cross-contaminates are in the waste water being disposed of? Is there anything in the waste water that wasn't there to start with prior to drilling?
This post was edited on 5/3/24 at 8:35 am
Posted by winkchance
St. George, LA
Member since Jul 2016
4129 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 8:39 am to
quote:

What, if any, cross-contaminates are in the waste water being disposed of? Is there anything in the waste water that wasn't there to start with prior to drilling?


Exactly, we take oil out of the ground where is sits, somehow bad. But destroying thousands of acres with glass and plastic mirrors that raise the temperature in that vicinity and destroys habitat for millions of insects, mammals and birds - awesome.

Then when they are of no use they get buried out in the desert with the oil and chemical leaking wind mills. Even better.
Posted by jcaz
Laffy
Member since Aug 2014
15772 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 8:40 am to
A few 2.5M earthquakes never hurt anyone.
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
21457 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 8:41 am to
quote:

What, if any, cross-contaminates are in the waste water being disposed of? Is there anything in the waste water that wasn't there to start with prior to drilling?


SOME, of that water, is going to have whatever chemicals may have gone downhole with the water used for fracking the wells. If anything is even mixed it.

However, for the most part, if you filtered all the hydrocarbons out completely, it's saltwater.

But that's still an issue. You can't just let it run on the ground. Look at Louisiana with saltwater intrusion along the coast during drought years. It makes rice and crawfish farmers nervous. An oil spill isn't going to kill all your vegetation, but saltwater absolutely will.

Every time I boil crawfish, crabs or shrimp, I always ask the wife what we want dead before I dump out the water.
This post was edited on 5/3/24 at 8:52 am
Posted by LegendInMyMind
Member since Apr 2019
55007 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 8:46 am to
quote:

SOME, of that water, is going to have whatever chemicals may have gone downhole with the water used for fracking the wells. If anything is even mixed it.

That's what I'm curious about, what contaminates are in the water that was there to begin with and to what extent.

quote:

However, for the most part, if you filtered all the hydrocarbons out completely, it's saltwater.


Is it filtered at all before being pumped into the wells?

quote:

You can't just let it run on the ground.

Of course not.

I've never really looked into this which is why I'm asking.

quote:

Every time I boil crawfish,

No need to go bragging, baw.
This post was edited on 5/3/24 at 8:49 am
Posted by White Bear
Yonnygo
Member since Jul 2014
14074 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 8:51 am to
quote:

saltwater
quote:

You can't just let it run on the ground.
Sure you can. Then lobby the state to change the rules and once the rules are changed start suing the majors for environmental damage!!!!
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
21457 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 8:51 am to
quote:

Is it filtered at all before being pumped into the wells?



Absolutely.

If it's not, for one, you'd gunk up the wellbore of the expensive saltwater disposal well that was drilled to put the water downhole, and you wouldn't be able to dispose of water for long. You're not going to spend $8-14 Million on an SWD and facilities to have that well be compromised for efficiency and environmental issues just two years down the line.

Also...those midstream SWD companies will filter out any oil the upstream E&Ps don't. That's what's called "skim oil", and those outfits LOVE it if their client doesn't skim enough of it off. They'll sell the oil, while still making money on the water disposal services.

The really smart Permian oil baws went into the water business ten years ago.
Posted by USAFTiger42
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2016
1856 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 8:54 am to
These people don't understand and will do their best to continue in their ideology.
Posted by The Goon
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Nov 2008
1251 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 8:57 am to
I read this the other day. It reads like it was taken from multiple google question and answers.

Zero mention of the depths and pressures the water is injected. It reads like oil producers are just throwing polluted water into drinking water reservoirs. Injection water was some of the nastiest stuff I’ve seen in the oilfield. The bacteria and H2S produced from this water causes a large amount of corrosion for artificial lift. Water injection has been around forever and nothing new to the industry.
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
21457 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 8:58 am to
quote:

It reads like it was taken from multiple google question and answers.


I agree, but it also does bring to light, in my opinion, possibly the largest challenge for our country to keep producing oil in the current record amounts.

quote:

The bacteria and H2S produced from this water causes a large amount of corrosion for artificial lift.


Isn't alot of that scrubbed out, though, before going back downhole?
This post was edited on 5/3/24 at 9:00 am
Posted by redstick13
Lower Saxony
Member since Feb 2007
38626 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 9:05 am to
Send that stuff to Utah. The Great Salt Lake has been on a negative trend for years.
Posted by The Goon
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Nov 2008
1251 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 9:07 am to
quote:

Isn't alot of that scrubbed out, though, before going back downhole?


It’s separated and then goes into a tank for storage. Sometimes the tanks are clean, others are not. Older formations use water injection on the back side to keep pressure on the reservoir and keep the oil moving and producing. Water flood can damage the formation and pressure/flow rates have to be monitored.

Water flood was great for my business. Every sucker rod would come out of hole looking like Swiss cheese from H2S corrosion.
Posted by cdhorn28
Member since Sep 2016
215 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 9:09 am to
Them SWDs baw
Posted by KamaCausey_LSU
Member since Apr 2013
14615 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 9:11 am to
Found this in the FAQs from the Texas Railroad Commission website.

quote:

The overwhelming majority of injected fluid is oilfield brine, which is also sometimes referred to as produced water. Oilfield brine is the water, with varying levels of salinity that is found in the same geologic formations that produce oil and gas. This produced water comes up simultaneously with the production of oil and gas. However, small quantities of substances used in the drilling, completion and production operations of a well may be mixed in this waste stream. Some of these materials that may enter into the oilfield brine waste stream are minor amounts of drilling mud, fracture fluids and well treatment fluids. Also, because the produced water is associated with crude oil and natural gas, small amounts of residual hydrocarbons may also be found in the produced water.

But you would still need to pull a sample since I'm sure the water pollutants vary by well. BTEX (Benzene, Toluene, Etylbenzene, and Xylenes) are probably common pollutants.

Curious if there would be an option to entrap the water in drying ponds, though I'm guessing that would be a less effective and more expensive option that the current well injection strategy. Especially since you'd eventually need to remediate the soil/sediment. Zero chance that the contaminated brine water would ever be allowed to be directly discharged under Clean Water Act standards.
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
21457 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 9:24 am to
quote:

Curious if there would be an option to entrap the water in drying ponds, though I'm guessing that would be a less effective and more expensive option that the current well injection strategy.


It's a thought. Though one even medium operator in the Permian would have to construct ponds with likely double liners all over hundreds to thousands of acres right by their operations. You could let the water evaporate, but you'd still have to figure out what to do with the solids, like the huge volumes of salt, leftover in those ponds.
Posted by Salviati
Member since Apr 2006
5592 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 9:35 am to
quote:

quote:

Curious if there would be an option to entrap the water in drying ponds, though I'm guessing that would be a less effective and more expensive option that the current well injection strategy.
It's a thought. Though one even medium operator in the Permian would have to construct ponds with likely double liners all over hundreds to thousands of acres right by their operations. You could let the water evaporate, but you'd still have to figure out what to do with the solids, like the huge volumes of salt, leftover in those ponds.
Decades ago, before injection, there were produced water ponds and pits. That's outmoded technology. Too much volume. Too many overflows. Too many spills. Ponds and pits are the source of much legacy oilfield litigation. Nobody wants to go back to ponds and pits.
Posted by Trevaylin
south texas
Member since Feb 2019
5967 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 10:09 am to
the U S Geologic Survey tracks the performance of 850,000 water wells in just the United States . The reason for ocean level rising is the amount of water being brought to the surface. Recharge of aquifers can take millennia before it returns to the subsurface.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram