- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: This is why the tornado grading scale needs to be changed…
Posted on 5/1/24 at 10:25 pm to RummelTiger
Posted on 5/1/24 at 10:25 pm to RummelTiger
quote:
I get why he's saying it.
Playing devil's advocate, if the science community is in agreement with the ranking based on strength and destruction, then why change it just because there was a massive tornado that didn't damage anything?
It would seem to reason that giving the higher ranking due to devastation makes sense.
Why should a strong hurricane that stayed out in open water get the same ranking as a Labor Day, Camille, etc., that actually wrecked shite?
Its not a big deal to me personally. But let’s look at another angle. When looking backwards at data its important for current weather people to have data. You never know what or when that data is important but having it available can show trends.
So if you are researching how many tornadoes at F-3 and above happened in zone X, under current methods you would be missing possibly important info. Because those F3 and above in middle of nowhere were rated less and won’t show up.
With modern equipment they can determine much better the strength. With hurricanes even if one never hits land they can study the strength of each years and where/when since they rate by strength not destruction.
Posted on 5/1/24 at 10:36 pm to OU Guy
The difference with hurricanes is they’re able to fly planes and use dropsondes to accurately measure the storms intensity. Tornados are too small and happen too quickly to be able to do that. You can’t expect an Air Force plane to be up and ready to go for every tornado that happens like what happens with mesoscale features (like hurricanes). And, as was mentioned earlier, there’s too many radar gaps to count on radar alone. You have to have something that can be consistent from tornado to tornado. Hence damage. Is it perfect for every storm? No. But what does it matter if a tornado that hits nothing is rated Ef-1 instead of ef-0 or ef-5? The nerds like the boat, rummy, and rdsdc that really want to know and study it will anyway.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News