- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: MT Shark Tank - Undeveloping Commercial/Residential Properties
Posted on 4/28/24 at 9:14 pm to RickAstley
Posted on 4/28/24 at 9:14 pm to RickAstley
Admirable goal, but who is going to pay to do this? Maybe I'm missing something, but that was my first thought.
2
Posted on 4/29/24 at 6:58 am to SloaneRanger
quote:
Admirable goal, but who is going to pay to do this? Maybe I'm missing something, but that was my first thought.
I really don't have a clue. I'm looking for some thoughts here. I know blight removal has been funded by some local governments, but I don't know the landscape well at all.
Posted on 4/29/24 at 8:37 am to SloaneRanger
I’ve always thought that developer should be required to put up a bond for land remediation (similar to what an oil company is required to do for plug and abandonment) before a project is approved.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News