- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Yes China - that is what we are doing
Posted on 4/7/25 at 1:41 pm to lake chuck fan
Posted on 4/7/25 at 1:41 pm to lake chuck fan
quote:
growth worth diminishing our national security
Last time someone truly threatened America was WW2 has anyone attacked an onshore us base since? How are we less secure?
quote:
gutting our middle class???
All the while the multinational corporations are enriching themselves.
So our companies are getting more money and that doesn't trickle out to everyone else in the form of more money for those workers here?
0
Posted on 4/7/25 at 1:42 pm to htowntyger
quote:
put U.S. interests above the common good of the international community, and advance U.S. hegemonic ambitions
Posted on 4/7/25 at 1:44 pm to htowntyger
AMERICA FIRST BITCH 
Posted on 4/7/25 at 1:47 pm to The Baker
quote:
frick this Nash equilibrium bullshite
Nash equilibrium is literally predicated on maximizing self interest.
Posted on 4/7/25 at 1:52 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
oklahogjr
Your standing on the USA should be the world cop and pay for it. In addition, allow the world to have an unfair economic advantage all in the name of peace.
Sorry sir AMERICANS are done with that and the fraudulent thieving NGO/USAid.
Posted on 4/7/25 at 1:55 pm to htowntyger
quote:FIFY
It attempts to exploit tariffs to subvert the existing international economic and trade order, put China's. interests above the common good of the international community, and advance China's hegemonic ambitions at the cost of the legitimate interests of all countries.
Posted on 4/7/25 at 2:04 pm to BHTiger
quote:
Your standing on the USA should be the world cop and pay for it.
Not my position. This has been the US position since before I was born. I'm simply highlighting the change.
quote:
In addition, allow the world to have an unfair economic advantage all in the name of peace.
Again define unfair. we continue to be the richest and most dominant global player under this strategy with our hegemony
Posted on 4/7/25 at 2:10 pm to htowntyger
China appears to be slow on the uptake
Posted on 4/7/25 at 2:23 pm to Seeing Grey
quote:
Nash equilibrium is literally predicated on maximizing self interest.
Group self interest. At the expense of pure competition.
Posted on 4/7/25 at 2:29 pm to The Baker
quote:
Group self interest. At the expense of pure competition.
Nash equilibrium is only applicable to two player zero sum games, which in turn is pure competition. Doesn't seem like the proper usage in this situation.
Posted on 4/7/25 at 2:37 pm to Seeing Grey
quote:
Nash equilibrium is only applicable to two player zero sum games
It is generalized to an arbitrary number of players.
quote:
Doesn't seem like the proper usage in this situation.
John Nash received the Nobel prize in Economics for the formalization of this concept.
Posted on 4/7/25 at 2:42 pm to htowntyger
This is like someone punching you in the face, then when you deck them they complain that you hit them and that you’re mean.
Posted on 4/7/25 at 2:45 pm to oklahogjr
You are a hegemonic empire guy
We paid for Marshall plan etc to influence stuff therefore we must continue to bleed money.
We paid for Marshall plan etc to influence stuff therefore we must continue to bleed money.
Posted on 4/7/25 at 2:47 pm to htowntyger
"'We have no eternal allies, and we have no perpetual enemies. Our interests are eternal and perpetual, and those interests it is our duty to follow."
Henry Temple, 3rd Viscount Palmerston
Henry Temple, 3rd Viscount Palmerston
Posted on 4/7/25 at 3:15 pm to The Baker
quote:
John Nash received the Nobel prize in Economics for the formalization of this concept.
Whelp, that solves it. Solutions to a narrow subset of games is applicable to all areas of an industry in which an award was presented I guess.
quote:
It is generalized to an arbitrary number of players.
Final derail, Nash equilibrium can theoretically apply to multiplayer games, however, you will never get a true equilibrium convergence due to the presence of collusion (such as in the case of international trade).
Only in 2 player zero sum games can you guarantee that you will actually converge to a nash equilibrium.
By all means though, keep throwing around terms that you have little grasp of and keep digging deeper when questioned about them. Its not even clear what point you were trying to make.
Posted on 4/7/25 at 3:17 pm to htowntyger
quote:
"It attempts to exploit tariffs to subvert the existing international economic and trade order, put U.S. interests above the common good of the international community, and advance U.S. hegemonic ambitions at the cost of the legitimate interests of all countries.
Anyone else notice Chinese Marxists talk the same way as Dimtard Marxists?
Accusing the other side of doing the same damn thing they are doing, whether it is true or not.
This post was edited on 4/7/25 at 3:20 pm
Posted on 4/7/25 at 3:18 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
we've had more peace in the world since we quit doing this.
You are retarded...
Posted on 4/7/25 at 3:28 pm to htowntyger
quote:Wash away the hegemonic hyperbole, and that is what every country does.
U.S. hegemonic ambitions at the cost of the legitimate interests of all countries.
Posted on 4/7/25 at 3:59 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
Again define unfair. we continue to be the richest and most dominant global player under this strategy with our hegemony
Reply?1...
LOL we are 34+ trillion in debt and can barely pay the interest. Just stop the insanity. The American President is putting American interest 1st.
quote:
Not my position. This has been the US position since before I was born. I'm simply highlighting the change
And it is wrong and not advantageous to the US.
Before WW II UAE was a sand pit with sheep hoarders, today they are loaded. 150 years ago England controlled a majority of the earth. shite changes and you will become a chapter in a history book if you don't adapt.
Posted on 4/7/25 at 4:05 pm to oklahogjr
With the exception of Korea, Vietnam, Russia, Ukraine, Israel, Egypt, Jordan, Syria, Iraq, Iran, Kuwait, Afghanistan, Rwanda, Somalia, Argentina, the UK, Cambodia, India, Pakistan, and probably more, not to mention international terrorism.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News