- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Would the Right do better with this Agenda
Posted on 5/23/20 at 1:09 pm
Posted on 5/23/20 at 1:09 pm
Pro-Gun , Pro-Life, Pro-Weed, Pro-Gay marriage, Anti-Illegal Imm, Anti-China, Pro-Tax Cuts. Pro-Wall. Pro-States Rights. I feel this would make the Republican Party more successful with the youngins.
9
Posted on 5/23/20 at 1:10 pm to Tigahhs97
So pro weed?
because that is the only change I see
probably gonna need weed to smoke yourself into oblivion if biden wins
because that is the only change I see
probably gonna need weed to smoke yourself into oblivion if biden wins
Posted on 5/23/20 at 1:16 pm to Tigahhs97
mostly ok
I would say decriminalize weed (government shouldn't promote intoxicants)
recognize domestic partnerships between any two or more persons regardless of sex (leave 'marriage' in the exclusive domain of religion)
ETA: almost forgot, add in beer for 18 year olds.
I would say decriminalize weed (government shouldn't promote intoxicants)
recognize domestic partnerships between any two or more persons regardless of sex (leave 'marriage' in the exclusive domain of religion)
ETA: almost forgot, add in beer for 18 year olds.
This post was edited on 5/23/20 at 2:38 pm
Posted on 5/23/20 at 1:18 pm to TrueTiger
quote:
recognize domestic partnerships between any two or more persons regardless of sex (leave 'marriage' in the exclusive domain of religion)
Well that isn't going to work because the entire point of gay "marriage" is to rub normal people's noses in it
and nobody argues about it any more anyway, normal people lost
Posted on 5/23/20 at 1:22 pm to TrueTiger
quote:
I would say decriminalize weed (government shouldn't promote intoxicants)
It has proven medicinal purposes...unlike tobacco and alcohol but whatever you say
Posted on 5/23/20 at 1:30 pm to TrueTiger
quote:I was just about to voice my disagreement with the “or more” part, when I realized this is the appropriate position to take.
recognize domestic partnerships between any two or more persons regardless of sex (leave 'marriage' in the exclusive domain of religion)
A domestic partnership is nothing more than a contractual obligation between any number of interested parties requiring only their mutual agreement to terms.
Marriage should indeed be the province of the Church, not the State. If you find a church that sanctions same sex marriage, then fine, you can be married - but the only obligation the State has is if you file as domestic partners.
Posted on 5/23/20 at 1:30 pm to honeybadger07
quote:
unlike tobacco and alcohol
the government requires warning labels
but
I recognize that the government is essentially in a partnership with these industries because of the taxes it collects from those products. But I'm against 'sin' taxes too.
Posted on 5/23/20 at 1:36 pm to FearlessFreep
quote:
A domestic partnership is nothing more than a contractual obligation between any number of interested parties requiring only their mutual agreement to terms.
exactly, when you strip out religion, we are talking about a business arrangement.
Posted on 5/23/20 at 1:37 pm to Tigahhs97
I’m sure it would but promoting drugs and gay sex isn’t conserving the values our ancestors believed in
Posted on 5/23/20 at 1:43 pm to TrueTiger
quote:
I would say decriminalize weed (government shouldn't promote intoxicants)
This is the simplest solution and it's also the correct one.
Posted on 5/23/20 at 1:50 pm to FredBear
quote:
This is the simplest solution and it's also the correct one.
it would put weed back to the same legal status it had prior to the 1930s
Posted on 5/23/20 at 1:55 pm to FearlessFreep
quote:
I was just about to voice my disagreement with the “or more” part, when I realized this is the appropriate position to take.
A domestic partnership is nothing more than a contractual obligation between any number of interested parties requiring only their mutual agreement to terms.
Marriage should indeed be the province of the Church, not the State. If you find a church that sanctions same sex marriage, then fine, you can be married - but the only obligation the State has is if you file as domestic partners.
Exactly. If there is a governmental benefit to such things as taxes, a domestic partnership that is recognized by the government, should be entitled to those benefits even if a "church or religious order" doesn't recognize it.
Posted on 5/23/20 at 1:57 pm to Tigahhs97
quote:
Pro-Weed, Pro-Gay marriage, Pro-States Rights
what if a state doesn't want legal weed and homo marriage then what?
Posted on 5/23/20 at 1:59 pm to gthog61
quote:
Well that isn't going to work because the entire point of gay "marriage" is to rub normal people's noses in it
Jesus fricking Christ, you are stupid.
To the OP, yes. That is a hood platform that would grow the right’s support.
Posted on 5/23/20 at 2:08 pm to TrueTiger
quote:
between any two or more persons
Talk about opening the floodgates of all kinds of tax and other evasive procedures.
Posted on 5/23/20 at 2:10 pm to Tigahhs97
quote:
Pro-Gun , Pro-Life, Pro-Weed, Pro-Gay marriage, Anti-Illegal Imm, Anti-China, Pro-Tax Cuts. Pro-Wall. Pro-States Rights. I feel this would make the Republican Party more successful with the youngins.
Sooooo...Rand Paul?
I like it
Posted on 5/23/20 at 2:12 pm to Tigahhs97
quote:
Pro-Gun , Pro-Life, Pro-Weed, Pro-Gay marriage, Anti-Illegal Imm, Anti-China, Pro-Tax Cuts. Pro-Wall. Pro-States Rights.
They would probably never lose another election but the pro-life thing maybe a non-starter if you don't give people options if they frick up or get fricked up
This post was edited on 5/23/20 at 2:13 pm
Posted on 5/23/20 at 2:19 pm to TigerFanInSouthland
quote:
Rand Paul
That’s what I was going to say... sounds like OP is looking for a libertarian government. Which is exactly what you need to combat today’s pro-nanny, pro-totolatarian left.
Posted on 5/23/20 at 2:24 pm to CDawson
quote:
Talk about opening the floodgates of all kinds of tax and other evasive procedures.
the easiest thing in the world to do would be forming a domestic partnerships with children to pass through estates from parent to children and avoid estate tax and any large estate holder would be an idiot not to do it.
Posted on 5/23/20 at 2:24 pm to Tigahhs97
quote:
Pro-Gun , Pro-Life, Pro-Weed, Pro-Gay marriage, Anti-Illegal Imm, Anti-China, Pro-Tax Cuts. Pro-Wall. Pro-States Rights. I feel this would make the Republican Party more successful with the youngins.
Isn't Trump all of those things?
Page 1 of 2
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News