- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Why the Supreme Court Labor Union ruling was so big
Posted on 6/27/18 at 4:50 pm
Posted on 6/27/18 at 4:50 pm
Taken from the HuffingandPuffington Post
quote:
The political ramifications of the ruling will be long-lasting. Unions are a pillar of the Democratic Party, steering money to labor-friendly candidates and helping to run Democratic ground games during campaigns. Janus may force some unions to cut back on political spending as they steer resources toward maintaining their membership levels.
If that’s the case, Republican candidates stand to benefit. As a recent paper from the National Bureau of Economic Research showed, right-to-work laws tend to drive down votes for Democratic candidates for office. Comparing presidential election results in adjacent counties across state lines, the bureau’s researchers found that the Democrat’s share of the vote fell by 3.5 percentage points after a right-to-work law went into effect.
10
Posted on 6/27/18 at 4:53 pm to The Boat
Just wait til the Supreme Court gets rid of welfare
Posted on 6/27/18 at 4:53 pm to The Boat
Today was a good day.
Posted on 6/27/18 at 4:54 pm to The Boat
As usual, the Democrats support issues based on how it benefits their party, not the American people as a whole.
Posted on 6/27/18 at 4:54 pm to The Boat
So this is a ruling concerning gov't employee unions. Has the issue already been decided concerning private sector unions?
Posted on 6/27/18 at 4:58 pm to The Boat
rush was qouting the shear dollar amounts the public sector unins sent to the DNC or Dem candidates compared to little if any to RNC/rep candidates.....
this was the issue. members had no say in how their "dues" were spend, often time going to red candidates they did not support....
this well will start to dry up....
this was the issue. members had no say in how their "dues" were spend, often time going to red candidates they did not support....
this well will start to dry up....
Posted on 6/27/18 at 4:59 pm to The Boat
quote:
The political ramifications of the ruling will be long-lasting. Unions are a pillar of the Democratic Party, STEALING money for far-left whackjob candidates
Fixed it for him!
Posted on 6/27/18 at 5:02 pm to The Boat
Well, if your party can't stay afloat without governmental manipulation and interference, then maybe your party is a sham.
Oh, and have a great day.
Oh, and have a great day.
Posted on 6/27/18 at 5:03 pm to Mac
Posted on 6/27/18 at 5:03 pm to Mac
Didn’t even have to use my AK.
Posted on 6/27/18 at 5:04 pm to roadGator
no barkin from the dog, no smog, and momma cooked a breakfast with no hog 
ETA: As a matter of fact, it's about that time. I think that's what I'll be jamming on the way home
ETA: As a matter of fact, it's about that time. I think that's what I'll be jamming on the way home
This post was edited on 6/27/18 at 5:06 pm
Posted on 6/27/18 at 5:08 pm to The Boat
Posted on 6/27/18 at 5:12 pm to CptRusty
You know it’s ironic
I had the booze she had the chronic
The Lakers beat the Supersonics
I had the booze she had the chronic
The Lakers beat the Supersonics
Posted on 6/27/18 at 5:30 pm to teke184
They decided the case correctly. Regardless of politics, it absolutely is a violation of the guys first amendment right to not have a say in joining a union and paying the cost. His only choice not to pay would be to quit.
How is this reasonable?!
How is this reasonable?!
Posted on 6/27/18 at 5:33 pm to The Boat
And the ruling didn't leave the unions without options.
It stated that the union could charge a "reasonable fee" for services rendered on behalf of a specific non-union employee for a specific matter (such as a grievance over employee discipline). They could also decide not to assist the employee (again, on an individual matter only).
It stated that the union could charge a "reasonable fee" for services rendered on behalf of a specific non-union employee for a specific matter (such as a grievance over employee discipline). They could also decide not to assist the employee (again, on an individual matter only).
Posted on 6/27/18 at 5:36 pm to Quidam65
They refuse to back the people who refuse to throw into the slush fund and I guarantee the Union gets decertified.
Posted on 6/27/18 at 5:39 pm to The Boat
I am just waiting for Barry Bonds or Fox Mulder to show up on this thread and chastise you for pointing out something so painfully-obvious.
BTW, I agree with your analysis.
BTW, I agree with your analysis.
Posted on 6/27/18 at 6:31 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
As usual, the Republicans support issues based on how it benefits their party, not the American people as a whole.
FIFU.
Posted on 6/27/18 at 7:03 pm to Mac
quote:
Today was a good day.
It's been a good string of days with these SCOTUS rulings.
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News