Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Why hasnt Moore filed a libel or slander suit against WaPo?

Posted on 11/16/17 at 10:14 pm
Posted by mahdragonz
Member since Jun 2013
6927 posts
Posted on 11/16/17 at 10:14 pm
Moore says the WaPo article wrongly describes his alleged behavior.

So why hasn't he taken the legal steps to demand a retraction or claim it is negatively affecting him?
Posted by BeeFense5
Kenner
Member since Jul 2010
41290 posts
Posted on 11/16/17 at 10:15 pm to
Still obsessed with Moore?
Posted by bamarep
Member since Nov 2013
51788 posts
Posted on 11/16/17 at 10:15 pm to
Why hasn't Gloria turned over the yearbook?
Posted by Toddy
Atlanta
Member since Jul 2010
27250 posts
Posted on 11/16/17 at 10:16 pm to
quote:

Why hasnt Moore filed a libel or slander suit against WaPo?


Everyone knows it's not gonna happen. He's just saying this to convince his zealots that he's innocent.
Posted by mahdragonz
Member since Jun 2013
6927 posts
Posted on 11/16/17 at 10:17 pm to
quote:

Why hasn't Gloria turned over the yearbook?


She's not legally required to.

Moore can change that and he hasn't.

His lawyer sending a weak threatening letter and not a legally binding document. .

Why not?
This post was edited on 11/16/17 at 10:18 pm
Posted by Toddy
Atlanta
Member since Jul 2010
27250 posts
Posted on 11/16/17 at 10:21 pm to
quote:

Why hasn't Gloria turned over the yearbook?


They could make her if they really wanted to. All this is public posturing to convince people he's not a child molester. Very obvious.
Posted by Halftrack
The Wild Blue Yonder
Member since Apr 2015
2763 posts
Posted on 11/16/17 at 10:25 pm to
The truth is an absolute defense and Moore knows it.
Posted by mattloc
Alabama
Member since Sep 2012
4298 posts
Posted on 11/16/17 at 10:28 pm to
5 day demand for retraction must be served prior to filing suit in Alabama.....
Posted by Havoc
Member since Nov 2015
28040 posts
Posted on 11/16/17 at 10:30 pm to
Melt bitch melt.
Posted by HailToTheChiz
Back in Auburn
Member since Aug 2010
48866 posts
Posted on 11/16/17 at 10:32 pm to
not even doing it
This post was edited on 11/16/17 at 10:33 pm
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
39348 posts
Posted on 11/16/17 at 10:40 pm to
That and then the burden of proof suddenly falls on him for somehow proving he didn't do something that never happened. This is why smear is so common in politics.
Only people with frick loads of money like Trump sue.

The fact that the accusations are falling apart very publicly likely has some impact as well.
Posted by AU_Right
Member since Oct 2016
3048 posts
Posted on 11/16/17 at 10:43 pm to
quote:


So why hasn't he taken the legal steps to demand a retraction or claim it is negatively affecting him?

So dipshits like you can go on a message boards and ask stupid questions all because your boy Weird Al's Pic really stole the thunder away from the BS Moore's yearbook pic.
This post was edited on 11/16/17 at 10:44 pm
Posted by EA6B
TX
Member since Dec 2012
14754 posts
Posted on 11/16/17 at 11:06 pm to
Because Moore is considered a "public figure" and his lawyers know the burden of proof is so high it would be a waste of time.

" In the context of defamation actions (libel and slander) as well as invasion of privacy, a public figure cannot base a lawsuit on incorrect harmful statements unless there is proof that the writer or publisher acted with actual malice.

"The plaintiff must produce clear and convincing evidence that the defendant actually knew the information was false or entertained serious doubts as to the truth of his publication. In making this determination, a court will look for evidence of the defendant's state of mind at the time of publication and will likely examine the steps he took in researching, editing, and fact checking his work. It is generally not sufficient, however, for a plaintiff to merely show that the defendant didn't like her, failed to contact her for comment, knew she had denied the information, relied on a single biased source, or failed to correct the statement after publication.
Not surprisingly, this is a very difficult standard for a plaintiff to establish. Indeed, in only a handful of cases over the last decades have plaintiffs been successful in establishing the requisite actual malice to prove defamation."
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 11/16/17 at 11:07 pm to
Why haven’t the “victims” filed charges against Moore?
Posted by matthew25
Member since Jun 2012
9425 posts
Posted on 11/16/17 at 11:37 pm to
Damn, that case came out of Alabama. Alabama sheriff won a huge verdict over Martin Luther King and the N. Y. Times.
Posted by Mephistopheles
Member since Aug 2007
8328 posts
Posted on 11/17/17 at 12:01 am to
quote:

That and then the burden of proof suddenly falls on him for somehow proving he didn't do something that never happened


No one made him claim he'll sue them. He chose to do that.
Posted by Mephistopheles
Member since Aug 2007
8328 posts
Posted on 11/17/17 at 12:02 am to
quote:

Because Moore is considered a "public figure" and his lawyers know the burden of proof is so high it would be a waste of time.



His lawyers are apparently shite. Read the letter they sent the Washington Post.
Posted by narddogg81
Vancouver
Member since Jan 2012
19624 posts
Posted on 11/17/17 at 12:02 am to
Because it’s almost impossible to win a libel lawsuit against a journalist?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram