- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Why Didn't Robert Mueller Attempt to Interview Julian Assange?
Posted on 4/21/19 at 7:38 pm
Posted on 4/21/19 at 7:38 pm
Did a quick search, and I couldn't find any article claiming that Mueller tried to interview the founder of Wikileaks, Julian Assange. For whatever reason, apparently Mueller and his team of Democrats had no interest in doing that.
Any thoughts?
Any thoughts?
Posted on 4/21/19 at 7:40 pm to KCT
Because Assange is a truthteller and truth has no place in the Russian collusion narrative.
Posted on 4/21/19 at 7:43 pm to KCT
He would hate to have to include all of the Seth Rich info in his report.
Posted on 4/21/19 at 7:58 pm to WylieTiger
Why didn't he talk to Seth Rich? Oh wait.
Posted on 4/21/19 at 8:00 pm to KCT
He didn’t want the truth or he would have been Clinton suicided
Posted on 4/21/19 at 8:17 pm to KCT
quote:
Any thoughts?
I think it might be interesting if Assange could interview Mueller.
This post was edited on 4/21/19 at 8:20 pm
Posted on 4/21/19 at 8:20 pm to KCT
If the investigation was about Russian Interference in the election then why did it not cover any of the things that were done on the Clinton side.
Russia bought many adds that also supported Clinton, and of course they provided the disinformation Dossier.
Russia bought many adds that also supported Clinton, and of course they provided the disinformation Dossier.
Posted on 4/21/19 at 8:29 pm to KCT
Have you ever "looked" for something you didn't really want to find but wanted to make a pass at it enough to be able to look like you were really trying?
Posted on 4/21/19 at 9:39 pm to KCT
Because Assange was holed up in the embassy, and the last thing he would want to do is meet with prosecutors of a country looking to arrest him on separate charges. Plus, snitches get stitches.
Posted on 4/21/19 at 9:50 pm to DellTronJon
yep,maybe he can be asked questions now that he is out of the embassy.
Posted on 4/21/19 at 10:04 pm to KCT
Who has Assange now, the Brits? Has there been any official word on who they intend to extradite him to? (They may well give him the old arsenic in his tea treatment rather than risk him talking about the British attack on our election.)
Posted on 4/21/19 at 10:09 pm to KCT
If Assange puts Seth Rich...even in death, then Assange loses all credibility and Wikeaks is dead. Sadly, this is why we will never hear the truth from Assange...
Posted on 4/21/19 at 10:12 pm to DellTronJon
quote:
Because Assange was holed up in the embassy, and the last thing he would want to do is meet with prosecutors of a country looking to arrest him on separate charges. Plus, snitches get stitches.
that would be such a hard intervue since anyone who wanted to got to go sit down with him in the embassy and interview him
THEY DIDNT WANT THE TRUTH
Posted on 4/21/19 at 10:23 pm to keakar
quote:
Because Assange was holed up in the embassy, and the last thing he would want to do is meet with prosecutors of a country looking to arrest him on separate charges. Plus, snitches get stitches.
that would be such a hard intervue since anyone who wanted to got to go sit down with him in the embassy and interview him
THEY DIDNT WANT THE TRUTH
This.
If Sean Hannity interviewed Assange inside the Ecuadorian embassy, either Mueller or one of his henchmen could have done so, too. They knew better than to do that, because it could've opened up a can of worms for them.
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News