Started By
Message

re: When You Cant Counter Witness Testimony

Posted on 11/20/19 at 8:57 am to
Posted by McLemore
Member since Dec 2003
31404 posts
Posted on 11/20/19 at 8:57 am to
quote:

Just attack their credibility! 


You do realize this is one of the primary purposes of live witness testimony, right?

Also, what precisely do you suggest be used to "counter" hearsay, non-expert opinion and speculation?
This post was edited on 11/20/19 at 9:00 am
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54201 posts
Posted on 11/20/19 at 8:58 am to
quote:

Flynn actually broke the law


And you think this guy didn't by running to his brother instead of his superiors about his concerns? Isn't that a breach of military protocol?
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
72884 posts
Posted on 11/20/19 at 8:59 am to
quote:

Gary Johnson


Of course
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
52730 posts
Posted on 11/20/19 at 9:01 am to
quote:

When You Cant Counter Witness Testimony


Define witness. Witness to rumors? Ok. Witness to their own opinions? Sure. Witness to facts? FAIL.

There has yet to be a single fact proving wrongdoing or any impeachable offenses by the president. There has yet to be a single issue of FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE, with all of these "witnesses".

Just because they served in the military does not make them immune from criticism. And when they blatantly lie and make up their own facts for political gain and use their military service as a shield from criticism, they deserve even more criticism.

Or, why don't you post 1 smidgeon of evidence presented by these incorruptible military officers. I bet you can't.
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
64060 posts
Posted on 11/20/19 at 9:01 am to
When you have been trying to impeach a POTUS for three stinking years I think credibility is damn well important whether one wears a collar, uniform or girl scout uniform.

Your sinking really low here.
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
56178 posts
Posted on 11/20/19 at 9:02 am to
quote:

Flynn actually broke the law


Then why were documents altered. Seems if one had a case one would not want to jeopardize prosecution by being sneaky little devils.

Posted by narddogg81
Vancouver
Member since Jan 2012
19626 posts
Posted on 11/20/19 at 9:46 am to
quote:

Flynn actually broke the law
actually no he didn't. He got his answers changed in the 302 summary from "I don't remember if I ever spoke with" to "I didn't speak with". That's literally it, that's what they used to destroy his life and force him to spend all his money defending himself from the made up charge, then they threatened to do all that to his son too.
Posted by Wtodd
Tampa, FL
Member since Oct 2013
67478 posts
Posted on 11/20/19 at 9:48 am to
Oliver North says hold my fricking beer
Posted by CleverUserName
Member since Oct 2016
12480 posts
Posted on 11/20/19 at 10:23 am to
quote:

Gary Johnson


So you voted for the one that had to ask a reporter what a city was that was then one the major foreign stories of the time? A city that was ground zero for Bashar Al-Assad’s Syrian army and the Syrian rebels? And he had zero clue?
Posted by Eighteen
Member since Dec 2006
33826 posts
Posted on 11/20/19 at 10:36 am to
And if you they don't have good testimony, praise their credibility and automatically believe them because they are career diplomats/military officers?
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram