- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: When did Republicans stop caring about bodily autonomy?
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:11 pm to BamaAtl
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:11 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
until a certain point the fetus cannot survive without the woman's body.
And a child cannot survive without a guardian. Can we just kill a kid if it bores us or we don't like it anymore? Why not? It can't survive on its own, it is a drain on society, and it is well within the parents rights to kill it, right? It is their kid and their choice.
1
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:11 pm to oogabooga68
quote:
like all too many black women, she believes
Who are you guys talking about now?
Because if it's me, I'm 100% neither black nor a woman.
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:11 pm to civiltiger07
quote:No. She's some fricking lab tech
So are you actually a doctor?
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:11 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
In a sense it did, by not properly equipping her with the knowledge and tools to prevent pregnancy and not properly allowing for a situation in which raising a child would be beneficial.
I was told that abortion is practically a rite of passage for all strong, independent women, and that having had an abortion practically enrolls you in a distinguished sisterhood.
You're painting the picture of a woman who's quite literally too dumb to function in modern society, so she should be able to murder her literally ill-conceived offspring as a get out of jail free card.
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:12 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
In a sense it did, by not properly equipping her with the knowledge and tools to prevent pregnancy and not properly allowing for a situation in which raising a child would be beneficial.
Your Communism is showing....
The Government is not responsible for holding peoples' hands and stopping them from being incredibly irresponsible, shitty beings....
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:12 pm to BamaAtl
quote:Aha, now it's context...
Another person who doesn't know what "viable" means in this context!
Keep moving those goalposts, baby killer
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:12 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
What would you call that scenario?
Pregnancy
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:12 pm to Nguyener
quote:
According to this post, you think the human life cycle start date and the latest acceptable date for an abortion are not the same thing?
Correct. I think the question revolves around viability, which isn't the same thing as life cycle.
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:12 pm to BamaAtl
quote:I can't help that you can't read.
Yeah, who would misinterpret an analogy for 20 pages then later claim it was intentional...oh..you?
By the way.
Thanks for completely gutting your whole thread a couple posts up.
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:12 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
I pointed out WHY it was a bad analogy
You still haven't done that, you've only misinterpreted the original analogy because you refused to answer the question.
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:12 pm to ShortyRob
quote:A TB Tester. My dog could do that job and probably better.
No. She's some fricking lab tech
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:13 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
Provided we make exceptions for rape/incest/mother's health/incompatibility with life I have no problem with third-trimester bans.
So you have no problem with third trimester bans as long as we create enough loop holes that it's not a ban anyway for what reason?
What about the mothers bodily autonomy? Why does she suddenly lose this at the last three months?
This post was edited on 5/16/19 at 1:19 pm
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:13 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
Do you view laws against murder as an infringement on somebody’s bodily autonomy?
It restricts the right of somebody to do something to someone else.
But if you only view the fetus as a non-person, then it is merely property.
Just like a slave in 1860 was mere property, or someone's pet dog is today.
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:13 pm to ShortyRob
quote:That got her arse handed to her by a real Doctor in the recent past.
So are you actually a doctor?
No. She's some fricking lab tech
This post was edited on 5/16/19 at 1:15 pm
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:13 pm to ShortyRob
Just to show it again
Bama says yes to abortion bans in 3rd trimester
That pretty much guts your whole thread.
Why does the woman suddenly lose "bodily autonomy" in the last 3 months?
Bama says yes to abortion bans in 3rd trimester
quote:Well shite
Provided we make exceptions for rape/incest/mother's health/incompatibility with life I have no problem with third-trimester bans.
That pretty much guts your whole thread.
Why does the woman suddenly lose "bodily autonomy" in the last 3 months?
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:13 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
fricking lab tech
ah well what school did you go to BamaAtl? I want to ensure I never have a lab tech that went to the same school as you.
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:13 pm to BamaAtl
quote:Then quit acting like it. If you are a male, oh Lord
Because if it's me, I'm 100% neither black nor a woman
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:14 pm to Jbird
quote:
That got her arse handed to her by a real Docotr in trhe recent past
I want the back story!
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:14 pm to BamaAtl
quote:The woman cannot be the person who is forced by the state to give up a Kidney because the state didn't put the baby in the woman.
You still haven't done that, you've only misinterpreted the original analogy because you refused to answer the question.
Only the BABY can be the "victim" in your analogy dumb arse.
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:14 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
Do you view laws against murder as an infringement on somebody’s bodily autonomy?
That's very dishonest of you. In this scenario, someone's rights are being violated. As a society, we've chosen for 40 years to acknowledge that the pregnant woman's rights supersede those of the fetus.
Suddenly, Republicans want to do a 180 on this.
Page 40 of 52
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News