re: When did Republicans stop caring about bodily autonomy?

Certainly not safe for the baby

quote:

---

Science has also provided us a way to decide when not to do this, safely.

---

i mean science provides all sorts of methods to murder humans. your point isn't really a point

quote:

---

Opinion pieces don't count

---

A scientific journal article on viability of extremely pre-term babies, and a definition of bodily autonomy, are not opinion pieces little buddy.

quote:

---

Science has also provided us a way to decide when not to do this, safely.

---

You mean end the life of another homo sapien with unique DNA. I notice you keep ignoring it so I'm just going to keep posting. The "fetus" is scientifically another homo sapien. You can call it a fetus or bundle of cells but if you took a tissue sample from it and sent it to a lap to see what species it is the results would say "homo sapien".

quote:

---

A pregnant woman's rights SHOULD be violated when she is carrying her 5th soon to be welfare dependent kid

---

So you're cool with abortions for wealthy women on their first pregnancy?

quote:

---

IVF. You'd do better not to traffic in absolutes - this isn't the Q thread where anyone who points out your bullshite has their post deleted and gets a DM about not pissing off the idiots

---

Now that I'm back at my computer and can properly address this:

I'm not saying that infertility procedures like IVF don't exist. Your entire statement is another doozie in the hit parade of intellectual dishonesty. I'll go there in the context of refuting your statement that Republicans don't care for children once they're born, since you brought up the Q Thread. Were you equipped with the mental faculties to comprehend what a significant component of that movement is about is exactly that - combating human trafficking and child abuse/molestation/pedophilia. Look into your hero HRC and the Clinton Foundation's work in post-earthquake Haiti and reconcile the CF's organizational take of 90% of their donations for operational expenses, salaries, etc.

On second thought, don't bother. You'll see more than you care to know in the relatively near future.

But since you want to talk about IVF in framed in an abortion discussion, show the me the couple who would pay $10-20k for the mere CHANCE at getting pregnant that would even jokingly refer to voluntarily aborting a baby because of mere inconvenience.

quote:

---

that's a straw man

---

It's not a straw man, it's literally your argument.

quote:

---

Science has decided that she can choose not to give up her autonomy,

---

via, potentially, murder

quote:

---

, but you'd like the state to step in and take away that choice.

---

well what other exceptions for murder laws do you propose?

quote:

---

stop feeding it for a month

---

Found another one who, 30 pages in, still doesn't understand the concept of bodily autonomy.

It's always fascinating how some of you can continue arguing these and have no idea what the discussion is even about.

quote:

---

Yep. She said it. We should be able to use technology to remove people from this life if it’s inconvenient to us

---

Sometimes, it's like they just put the ball on the T for ya