- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
What would the gop say if Hillary Clinton gave Chelsey Clinton top security clearance?
Posted on 3/2/19 at 6:41 am
Posted on 3/2/19 at 6:41 am
In light of trump ordering his son in law be given top security clearance despite not being able to clear cia and fbi back ground checks how big of a shite storm would trumpflakes be displaying if Hillary did the same thing with Chelsey Clinton.
68
Posted on 3/2/19 at 6:43 am to Pbhog
Uh, she would have to president first, correct? Well, we have a problem here.
Posted on 3/2/19 at 6:45 am to Homesick Tiger
I know you don’t understand what a hypothetical question is so I won’t even attempt to argue with you
Posted on 3/2/19 at 6:47 am to Pbhog
If Bill Clinton gave Chelsea’s husband a security clearance against the recommendation of the intelligence community?
They would crucify him
They would crucify him
Posted on 3/2/19 at 6:47 am to Pbhog
So this is one of those "if your aunt had a dick" type threads. Enlightening.
Posted on 3/2/19 at 6:48 am to Pbhog
They would put up a fight, as expected. I'm not going to try and say repubs aren't above political bias as well.
But as we've seen over the Clibton's time in office, they are corrupt as hell.
But as we've seen over the Clibton's time in office, they are corrupt as hell.
Posted on 3/2/19 at 6:48 am to TOKEN
Yep they would be able to fill the water at the Washington monument with the tears of republicans
Posted on 3/2/19 at 6:49 am to Pbhog
If Bill Clinton legally adopted Web Hubbell's child and then Hillary Clinton became the Democratic choice for President without rigging the primary and then she won the election without the vote of illegals or Russian campaign money ...then asking for top security clearance for her daughter would be considered .
Posted on 3/2/19 at 6:49 am to Homesick Tiger
quote:
So this is one of those "if your aunt had a dick" type threads. Enlightening.
The intelligence community didn’t want to give a Kushner a security clearance. I would love to know why?
Posted on 3/2/19 at 6:51 am to TOKEN
quote:
The intelligence community
The antiTrump one? Pretty much answers your question doesn't it?
Posted on 3/2/19 at 6:51 am to Pbhog
quote:
Yep they would be able to fill the water at the Washington monument with the tears of republicans
Well, the Washington Monument is overflowing right now. Jared shouldn’t be handling all of this stuff. Even though I think he does a good job. It has to be hard for Trump to trust the intel community.
Posted on 3/2/19 at 6:53 am to Pbhog
I think it’s wrong on both sides.
Posted on 3/2/19 at 6:53 am to Homesick Tiger
quote:
The antiTrump one? Pretty much answers your question doesn't it?
I think we should find out why?
What was the red flags preventing Kushner from getting one?
Posted on 3/2/19 at 6:54 am to Pbhog
I think people have a misunderstanding about security clearances.
A top security clearance only means you've been vetted that you aren't a security risk to the United States. Mostly are you trustworthy, do you have financial troubles that can allow you to be leveraged for example.
The clearance doesn't grant you any access to any intel. That is still based on a "need to know". Meaning your job requires you to view the Top Secret information. It ain't "24" and you get access to the top secret intel database or some shite. If his role in the administration warranted access to top secret information, the owner of said information would have to agree.
If he wasn't granted top secret clearance, the agency was probably being petty bitches.
Regardless, this is really a non issue for the reason stated.
Disclaimer: my security clearance lapsed a decade ago, I assume policies are still similar.
A top security clearance only means you've been vetted that you aren't a security risk to the United States. Mostly are you trustworthy, do you have financial troubles that can allow you to be leveraged for example.
The clearance doesn't grant you any access to any intel. That is still based on a "need to know". Meaning your job requires you to view the Top Secret information. It ain't "24" and you get access to the top secret intel database or some shite. If his role in the administration warranted access to top secret information, the owner of said information would have to agree.
If he wasn't granted top secret clearance, the agency was probably being petty bitches.
Regardless, this is really a non issue for the reason stated.
Disclaimer: my security clearance lapsed a decade ago, I assume policies are still similar.
Posted on 3/2/19 at 6:54 am to Purple Spoon
quote:
I think it’s wrong on both sides.
Exactly, there is a reason for nepotism laws.
Posted on 3/2/19 at 6:54 am to Pbhog
You wouldn't need a security clearance with Hillary as president. Just pay a high schooler a few bucks to hack into the server in her bathroom. 
Posted on 3/2/19 at 6:55 am to TOKEN
What’s kushner done to show you he’s done a good job?
Posted on 3/2/19 at 6:57 am to Pbhog
Brokered Saudi Deal, New NAFTA, Criminal Justice Reform
The little shite is pretty good
The little shite is pretty good
Posted on 3/2/19 at 6:58 am to Pbhog
Silly hog,
Chelsey is too ugly to get that type of clearance and everyone knows this....
Chelsey is too ugly to get that type of clearance and everyone knows this....
Posted on 3/2/19 at 6:59 am to Pbhog
Ordinarily, I would consider a President overriding the input from the Intelligence Community to give a family member a TS clearance a big issue.
It would be an even bigger Issue for a hypothetical President Clinton, given her history of disregard for national security.
But given the demonstrated institutional resistance from the IC against this particular President, I am much more understanding.
In short, I trust Trump more than I trust the current FBI or the CIA on the subject of Trump.
It would be an even bigger Issue for a hypothetical President Clinton, given her history of disregard for national security.
But given the demonstrated institutional resistance from the IC against this particular President, I am much more understanding.
In short, I trust Trump more than I trust the current FBI or the CIA on the subject of Trump.
This post was edited on 3/2/19 at 7:03 am
Page 1 of 7
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News