Started By
Message
locked post

Wells Fargo stops making PPP loans because it hit $10 billion - why you ask?

Posted on 4/6/20 at 8:10 am
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
98454 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 8:10 am
Because of their shenanigans opening fake accounts for people for bonuses and other hinky shite

quote:

Wells Fargo said Sunday evening that it has exhausted its $10 billion capacity for lending under the SBA’s Paycheck Protection Program as the bank operates under a regulatory asset cap.

In other words, amid the pandemic-induced downturn that has some talking of an impending economic depression, one of the nation’s largest lenders will largely be kept on the sidelines.

“Today, the company continues to operate in compliance with an asset cap imposed by its regulator due to actions of past leadership,” Wells Fargo CEO Charlie Scharf said in a statement Sunday. “While we are actively working to create balance sheet capacity to lend, we are limited in our ongoing ability to use our strong capital and liquidity position to extend additional credit.


Just wanted to get the real news out there before some dumbass media member blames this on Trump or the SBA.

In other news...a single bank has already made $10 billion in PPP loans since the program started 3 days ago.
Posted by catfish 62
Atlanta
Member since Mar 2010
4908 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 8:18 am to
I would be curious to know if that is $10Bn in applications, or $10Bn in actual fundings. The SBA was still tweaking rules late Saturday night.
Posted by Wtodd
Tampa, FL
Member since Oct 2013
67482 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 8:23 am to
If they already lent $10B, they ain't on the sidelines
Posted by I B Freeman
Member since Oct 2009
27843 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 8:25 am to
It is stupid to have an asset cap on Wells Fargo because of the fake checking account scandal. That so called scandal did little to hurt anybody.

Now here we sit with one of the nation's largest business lending institutions with no lending capacity because of temporary lending cap.

Wells has the balance sheet to fund over $384 billion in loans---more than the entire PPP funded program.

The need to fine Wells and remove the cap---for the sake of the borrowing businesses that depend on them.
Posted by I B Freeman
Member since Oct 2009
27843 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 8:26 am to
The banks can fund very quickly under the program. All they need is the SBA loan number and the SBA is turning them around online.
Posted by greygoose
Member since Aug 2013
11438 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 8:26 am to
My bank had an announcement on their site, that said that they were no longer accepting new applications for the PPP loan, due to overwhelming response........That was very early on Saturday morning!

Luckily, I got my app submitted about 30 minutes after they released it on Friday afternoon.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
98454 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 8:26 am to
quote:

The need to fine Wells and remove the cap---for the sake of the borrowing businesses that depend on them.


But is it Treasury or is it Cali that has capped them?
Posted by AUin02
Member since Jan 2012
4280 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 8:27 am to
quote:

It is stupid to have an asset cap on Wells Fargo because of the fake checking account scandal. That so called scandal did little to hurt anybody.


Yeah, I mean, what's a little identity theft among friend err I mean clients.
Posted by I B Freeman
Member since Oct 2009
27843 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 8:37 am to
The Federal Reserve Bank and they have already paid big fines and they face several large lawsuits.

They have been punished. They fired over 5000 people over the scandal. CEO was replaced.

Posted by SSpaniel
Germantown
Member since Feb 2013
29658 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 8:41 am to
quote:

I would be curious to know if that is $10Bn in applications, or $10Bn in actual fundings.


Applications.
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
37007 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 9:21 am to
So here's my question, it's a bit of inside baseball but I think it's important.

The 349 billion... what exactly does that apply to?

1) Are the banks funding these loans and then Treasury will pay the loans off when they are forgiven (to the extend they are forgiven)?

2) Is treasury giving 349 billion to the banks in cash, today, to lend, so the banks don't have to lend their own money?

If the SBA is limiting lending capacity per bank, that tells me that the system has enough capacity to handle this even with the cap on WF.

Also, keep in mind that this program is likely to end up with a ton of fraud... and considering WF was busted for fraud... I can understand holding them down a bit.
Posted by LSUAlum2001
Stavro Mueller Beta
Member since Aug 2003
47119 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 9:31 am to
quote:


Because of their shenanigans opening fake accounts for people for bonuses and other hinky shite



My wife's business applied for it, and I told her that I guarantee that people are fraudulently applying for these loans.

Like those who applied for money in the BP oil spill.
Posted by Ag Zwin
Member since Mar 2016
19911 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 9:32 am to
Leaves more for the rest of us.

Posted by wareaglepete
Lumon Industries
Member since Dec 2012
10926 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 9:34 am to
quote:

Wells has the balance sheet to fund over $384 billion in loans---more than the entire PPP funded program.


The other banks of the big 4 plus all the large Regional banks have plenty of capacity. This is not a big deal.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57090 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 9:36 am to
quote:

It is stupid to have an asset cap on Wells Fargo because of the fake checking account scandal. That so called scandal did little to hurt anybody.

Da fuq?
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123776 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 9:38 am to
quote:

Wells Fargo stops making PPP loans because it hit $10 billion - why you ask?
Because of their shenanigans opening fake accounts for people for bonuses and other hinky shite
Posted by Bruco
Charlotte, NC
Member since Aug 2016
2789 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 9:40 am to
quote:

1) Are the banks funding these loans and then Treasury will pay the loans off when they are forgiven (to the extend they are forgiven)?


Banks are definitely funding these loans. They process the application and validate the info provided. It’s a limited and quick underwriting but the banks do have exposure to fraud losses here and do need to spend some time doing their best to validate the payroll info businesses provide.

The bank I work for had 25 people in our SBA lending group. It’s now been temporarily increased to 350 to try and process these as quick as possible.
Posted by catfish 62
Atlanta
Member since Mar 2010
4908 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 10:13 am to
) Is treasury giving 349 billion to the banks in cash, today, to lend, so the banks don't have to lend their own money?

No, this is Bank capital with the idea that the gov/sba will step in and pay us off on the back end. That's why the process is taking some time. No bank wants to toss around their capital without knowing for damn sure that the government is guaranteeing. as you can imagine, the demand is incredible. every app has to go through the SBA in order to get a loan number which means that your gaurantee is essentially in place.
Posted by I B Freeman
Member since Oct 2009
27843 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 10:15 am to
The banks are funding them and will only be reimbursed the amount of forgiveness the borrower qualifies for. They will pay that as soon as the borrower qualifies for forgiveness and proves performance.

The SBA will reimburse the banks if the loans go bad but since the loans are two years that could some time.

Thus the balance sheet issues for WF and others.

The SBA is not limiting the banks—the Federal Reserve has capital requirements. The SBA has only $340 billion authorized in loan guarantees. If the capital punishments on WF were lifted and they had traditional capital requirements they could do it all.

It is foolish to limit a bank with such a strong balance sheet in these times of limited credit.
This post was edited on 4/6/20 at 10:20 am
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
37007 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 10:57 am to
quote:

The SBA is not limiting the banks


False - SBA is allocating capacity to banks so everyone knows what they have to work with.

quote:

If the capital punishments on WF were lifted and they had traditional capital requirements they could do it all.

It is foolish to limit a bank with such a strong balance sheet in these times of limited credit.


There is plenty enough capacity in the system to handle these.

How many shares of WF do you own?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram