- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: We Are Now Seeing What Q Was Predicting 7 Years Ago
Posted on 7/21/25 at 7:35 pm to Richleau
Posted on 7/21/25 at 7:35 pm to Richleau
quote:
You already know the answer. Many of the detractors here won’t even admit they didn’t read the original Q thread nor have any idea of any Q posts.
I read some of it. I read lots of claims by Q followers in other threads. I'm not a Q expert, never claimed to be. I'm not really a detractor, I never shite all over the thread, I just don't see any evidence that it's true. And every time I've asked a Q believer for evidence, I get vague bullshite similar to what you just said.
The source is either reliable or it's not. If it is, there should be plenty of evidence. If you want to convince people, share it. If you're just trying to convince yourself and the secret Ovaltine club and you just want to circle jerk about normies, OK.
But the "fear in their hearts?" Seriously?
1
Posted on 7/21/25 at 7:35 pm to VoxDawg
Agreed, it’s so easily refutable too. Reminds of the same morons who believed the Charlottesville “fine people” hoax. These people are morons who will believe anything they read and have never once dug in to any source to verify anything. That’s easily displayed in five seconds of speaking to them. The biggest point of Q was to do your own research. Why else was everything posed as a question? It was a group detective effort to research and learn and the result was citizen journalism crushing mainstream media. The “we are the news” was born from Q and it’s not a shock that folks like Elon and Trump refer to messaging spawned from Q as well.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 7:36 pm to TigerDoc
quote:
What's the source there?
Some half-retarded AI prompt that doesn't even get the drop #s correct.
You can tell because it regurgitates his confirmation bias syntax that was in the original prompt, at the end.
"Falsifiable time-bound predictions" is what he asked it to find.
This post was edited on 7/21/25 at 7:37 pm
Posted on 7/21/25 at 7:37 pm to Flats
I’ll repeat, do you believe in the recent allegations declassified by Tulsi? If so, then you believe in what Q posited. Do you believe that Boasberg is a rogue activist judge? If so, then you believe in what Q posited. The list goes on and on, but the point was disclosure. It is only now that the pieces are in play to actually hold these people accountable.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 7:49 pm to Richleau
This highlights another interesting creature drawn to anything tangentially related to this subject.
The “I’ll never believe anything you say on this subject, but go ahead and try to convince me to change my mind, because I won’t no matter what you say because I’ve already determined that anything you say is wrong” attention seeker.
In between all of that there were some compelling discussions.
The “I’ll never believe anything you say on this subject, but go ahead and try to convince me to change my mind, because I won’t no matter what you say because I’ve already determined that anything you say is wrong” attention seeker.
In between all of that there were some compelling discussions.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 8:00 pm to Richleau
quote:Would it surprise you to know this board called it before Q? Like months before?
Would it shock you that this was already disclosed by Q? So you would then agree that regardless of consequence, Q was indeed correct here?
quote:About 2 of the 23 he posted were refuted and even then, the drop Vox posted was completely wrong.
As to northfag, you mean the ai slop that was immediately refuted? Did
Posted on 7/21/25 at 8:02 pm to VoxDawg
quote:The #15 drop you posted was completely wrong. You wanted to quibble over arrested and indicted. Neither happened.
The one with multiple factual errors in the first three "examples"?
Posted on 7/21/25 at 8:36 pm to Jake88
So you know for a fact that there are no sealed indictments with Podesta's or Abedin's names on them?
Helluva inside scoop.
Helluva inside scoop.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 8:41 pm to VoxDawg
quote:Oh my God.
So you know for a fact that there are no sealed indictments with Podesta's or Abedin's names on them?
Just invent secret events and ask others to disprove them. That's not how it works. This post was edited on 7/21/25 at 8:45 pm
Posted on 7/21/25 at 8:42 pm to Jake88
it’s the hubris while he does it that’s so funny to me This post was edited on 7/21/25 at 8:43 pm
Posted on 7/21/25 at 10:05 pm to KCT
That was the greatest, most fun thread in the history of Tigerdroppings.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 10:12 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
They didn't destroy it, they just put it on mothballs because of a terminal lack of testicular fortitude.
I'm OK with it. Sure beats the site being closed and comments on other boards of - Chicken didn't kill himself. The last administration was cutthroat with zero moral restraint. They reminded me a lot of my ex.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 11:27 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
boosiebadazz
Hey boozie! How's it going baby?
As for the Q stuff...
As Roger Waters wrote in 'Brain Damage,' "Got to keep the loonies on the path."
Page 9 of 9
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News