- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: We Are Now Seeing What Q Was Predicting 7 Years Ago
Posted on 7/21/25 at 6:40 pm to LookSquirrel
Posted on 7/21/25 at 6:40 pm to LookSquirrel
quote:Well, of course. And many would agree.
As to an "embarrassment to this site?, Many here would disagree
quote:Is it going to be something we already know? The dems are crooked? Somebody, somewhere is going to be indicted?
Hearing word of a "Q" comm coming soonish
2
Posted on 7/21/25 at 6:41 pm to Jake88
quote:
An embarrassment to this site.
Explain Larry Leo then.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 6:41 pm to Jake88
Do you not believe in Tulsi’s recent disclosure? Give me some examples on where that thread erred.
This post was edited on 7/21/25 at 6:42 pm
Posted on 7/21/25 at 6:42 pm to ezride25
quote:Blackmail pics of Chicken.
quote:
An embarrassment to this site.
Explain Larry Leo then
Posted on 7/21/25 at 6:43 pm to Richleau
quote:Sure to a degree. Will it actually amount to anything?I dont know. History says "no."
Do you not believe in Tulsi’s recent disclosure?
quote:Read Northshorbamaman's post a page or so back.
Give me some examples on where that thread erred.
This post was edited on 7/21/25 at 6:45 pm
Posted on 7/21/25 at 6:50 pm to Jake88
quote:
I dont know.
Then maybe stop lecturing everyone?
The original ToE was about discourse regarding that which none of us knows. Sadly most of it was filled with those, like you, who concern themselves more with lecturing from a perceived place of power rather than honest discourse, even in disagreement.
It’s been pages and pages of you repeating yourself now. We understand your position. Anything else you’d like to contribute?
Posted on 7/21/25 at 6:52 pm to Jake88
Just checking in…. Has this become or is becoming the new Q thread?
Posted on 7/21/25 at 6:58 pm to Jake88
Would it shock you that this was already disclosed by Q? So you would then agree that regardless of consequence, Q was indeed correct here?
As to northfag, you mean the ai slop that was immediately refuted? Did you even read the thread? Have you seen any q posts?
As to northfag, you mean the ai slop that was immediately refuted? Did you even read the thread? Have you seen any q posts?
Posted on 7/21/25 at 6:59 pm to Jake88
quote:
Is it going to be something we already know? The dems are crooked? Somebody, somewhere is going to be indicted?
I would wager more like point a laser on pertinent pending litigation highlighting aspects to research in an effort to keep "the people" informed and focused.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 7:02 pm to northshorebamaman
quote:
Total falsifiable time bound predictions: 23
Correct: 0
Wrong: 23
Accuracy: 0% (Statistically impressive in its own way)
Ok, well.......besides those, I bet he was pretty damn accurate.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 7:08 pm to Flats
Except that was already debunked. I find it funny that in a thread filled with those deriding Q are quick to believe AI slop without any due diligence on their part. Sheep gonna sheep.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 7:10 pm to Richleau
quote:
Except that was already debunked.
Fine, present your own claims. Every time that's asked the answer is some vague bullshite about not "getting it".
Posted on 7/21/25 at 7:12 pm to Jake88
quote:
Read Northshorbamaman's post a page or so back.
The one with multiple factual errors in the first three "examples"?
Ninja, please. That was the result of a desperate attempt to dEbOOnK something they feel isn't worth bothering with, and their AI pinch hitter let them down mightily.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 7:12 pm to Flats
Yea that might suck and maybe even mean something IF "Q" was simply predicting things.
I think the "Great Awakening" and now the "Truther" movement are working in our favor.
I think the "Great Awakening" and now the "Truther" movement are working in our favor.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 7:13 pm to Flats
Have you ever done your own research regarding anything or do you just wait for someone to tell you what to think?
Posted on 7/21/25 at 7:14 pm to LookSquirrel
quote:
Yea that might suck and maybe even mean something IF "Q" was simply predicting things.
So he wasn't predicting things? Or it just doesn't matter if he was and never got any correct?
Posted on 7/21/25 at 7:16 pm to Cromulent
You already know the answer. Many of the detractors here won’t even admit they didn’t read the original Q thread nor have any idea of any Q posts. It’s honestly weird why something they know nothing about strikes such fear in their hearts. Pathetic really.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 7:22 pm to Flats
I am wondering if all this Q bashing is mostly because it was pro Trump.
That would explain a lot.
That would explain a lot.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 7:27 pm to Flats
Vox already went through it, did you not read it?
Posted on 7/21/25 at 7:30 pm to Richleau
quote:
Many of the detractors here won’t even admit they didn’t read the original Q thread nor have any idea of any Q posts. It’s honestly weird why something they know nothing about strikes such fear in their hearts. Pathetic really
Considering the post from the guy multiple usual suspects are holding up as some gold standard (never seen that username before in 13+ years of posting here...) was outsourced to AI and factually & materially correct on the first 3 and final of his "proofs" ... I'd say you've hit the nail on the head.
Anyone who openly touts the Zombie JFKjr angle has immediately outed themselves as being wholly agenda-driven and not able to be engaged in good faith.
Page 8 of 9
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News