Started By
Message

re: We Are Now Seeing What Q Was Predicting 7 Years Ago

Posted on 7/21/25 at 12:34 pm to
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39159 posts
Posted on 7/21/25 at 12:34 pm to
Lol. Nothing Q said came true. We can go over the individual posts again.
Posted by The Maj
Member since Sep 2016
30543 posts
Posted on 7/21/25 at 12:37 pm to
quote:

Nothing Q said came true.


Well, that all depends on how you determine the truth... It was certainly truthful to many...
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39159 posts
Posted on 7/21/25 at 12:38 pm to
quote:

Well, that all depends on how you determine the truth... It was certainly truthful to many...



Sounds like relativist nonsense. Q was quite narrow about what he stated was going to happen, from the first post Q made.
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
75121 posts
Posted on 7/21/25 at 12:45 pm to
quote:

So a sitting president covered up information that would paint one particular presidential candidate in a negative light in order help influence the outcome of an election?

And then blamed it on Russia?

And then people on message boards patted each other on the back as they all assured each other that nothing would ever happen as a result?

Curious.

History may not always repeat itself, but it will often rhyme...
Posted by The Maj
Member since Sep 2016
30543 posts
Posted on 7/21/25 at 12:45 pm to
quote:

Sounds like relativist nonsense.


To you maybe but it wasn't nonsense to those in the Q-thread...
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
75121 posts
Posted on 7/21/25 at 12:47 pm to
quote:

Lol. Nothing Q said came true. We can go over the individual posts again.

All we can do is be thankful that you were smarter than everyone else and saw through it.

Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39159 posts
Posted on 7/21/25 at 12:49 pm to
quote:

All we can do is be thankful that you were smarter than everyone else and saw through it.



Yup. In a few years, when nothing happens, we can reconvene.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39159 posts
Posted on 7/21/25 at 12:50 pm to
quote:

To you maybe but it wasn't nonsense to those in the Q-thread...



This is just the 'wrestling' gif. Either things are true or they are not.
Posted by The Maj
Member since Sep 2016
30543 posts
Posted on 7/21/25 at 12:51 pm to
quote:

Either things are true or they are not.


Everything is absolutely, absolute... got it...
Posted by KCT
Psalm 23:5
Member since Feb 2010
46132 posts
Posted on 7/21/25 at 12:51 pm to
quote:

Yup. In a few years, when nothing happens, we can reconvene


Fine. In the meantime, the fact that Q was talking about these skunks and what they had done in 2017 seems to have soared right over the top of your head
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39159 posts
Posted on 7/21/25 at 12:54 pm to
quote:

Everything is absolutely, absolute... got it...



That's the way objectivity works. We have several systems we use by which we can come to a consensus on what truth is. It simply isn't the case that something is true by virtue of someone believing it to be true.

In the case of the Q thread, there were several specific claims made by that poster, with a set timeline, which those believers accepted wholeheartedly. That doesn't make any of those claims true.
Posted by salty1
Member since Jun 2015
5036 posts
Posted on 7/21/25 at 12:55 pm to
quote:

It's a shame the the board owner lived up to his name, because at the time it was moved to the Admin-only Classics Board (w/ As the Plains Burn & others), it was the largest contiguous discussion of Q and Q-adjacent topics on the whole of the internet.


It’s not gone…it exists in some folder somewhere. All admin would have to do is make it active again. If the TD Q-thread came back, it would break the internet for a day or two. This site would have more traffic than it’s ever seen. There’s no three letter agency threatening to prosecute site owners now for “disinformation”…absolutely no legal harm could come from bringing it back. Do it.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39159 posts
Posted on 7/21/25 at 12:55 pm to
quote:

Fine. In the meantime, the fact that Q was talking about these skunks and what they had done in 2017 seems to have soared right over the top of your head



Lol. This isn't the point you think it is.
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
78039 posts
Posted on 7/21/25 at 1:29 pm to
quote:


Tell us how you would do it, or at a minimum how it would need to be framed to earn your trust?

Trust would have been earned if Q had been correct about Hillary and the frog marching after she was caught trying to leave the country. Further, for it to have been more than just vague foolishness that anyone could pump out there would have had to be more specific detailed posts that came out and came to fruition. None of the "You have the knowledge. C begets R. Research and you will see. Good is in control, we will persevere." foolishness.

How would I have done it? I wouldn't have. But it was a fun game for yall.
This post was edited on 7/21/25 at 1:33 pm
Posted by Free888
Member since Oct 2019
2875 posts
Posted on 7/21/25 at 1:31 pm to
quote:

It’s not gone…it exists in some folder somewhere. All admin would have to do is make it active again. If the TD Q-thread came back, it would break the internet for a day or two. This site would have more traffic than it’s ever seen. There’s no three letter agency threatening to prosecute site owners now for “disinformation”…absolutely no legal harm could come from bringing it back. Do it.


That’s what I don’t understand. Under the previous administration there was a threat of some type of interference. Under this administration it would be welcomed.
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
78039 posts
Posted on 7/21/25 at 1:31 pm to
quote:

In the meantime, the fact that Q was talking about these skunks and what they had done in 2017 seems to have soared right over the top of your head
Uh, this board was talking about it months before Q made a debut. On March 14th 2017 Trump accused Obama of "tapping" his campaign and presidency. Q was waaaaay behind the curve.
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
75121 posts
Posted on 7/21/25 at 1:32 pm to
That's a solid emotional investment for something the Good Lord granted you clarity to see right through.

IDGAF about a lot of things in this world, but I sure as hell don't actively participate in discussions about those things.

Live look at me as I simultaneously DGAF about NASCAR, the Open Championship, the WNBA All-Star Game & Grey's Anatomy:

Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
75121 posts
Posted on 7/21/25 at 1:34 pm to
quote:

there would have had to be more specific detailed posts that came out and came to fruition.


And what of enemy SIGINT if all of the major moves were telegraphed for the sake of impressing some dudes on the internet at the cost of efficiently and effectively prosecuting treason?
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
78039 posts
Posted on 7/21/25 at 1:38 pm to
quote:


And what of enemy SIGINT if all of the major moves were telegraphed for the sake of impressing some dudes on the internet at the cost of efficiently and effectively prosecuting treason?
This is why Q wasnt part of the administration or even someone in the know. They wouldn't be blabbing foolishness on the web. Once Q blew the call on Hillary it became very vague and more like a kid's game so that it couldn't be embarrassed again like that.
Posted by PastorJ
Member since Sep 2024
583 posts
Posted on 7/21/25 at 1:40 pm to
Are people still believing in that Q nonsense?
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram