re: We Are Now Seeing What Q Was Predicting 7 Years Ago

That WAS fun! I mighta told them to get a room at one time or another.

quote:

---

If you don’t like it. Don’t participate.

---

This is how normal, well-adjusted people think. Unfortunately, punk-arse trolls like Boosie and certain other clueless self-proclaimed know-it-alls love nothing more than to puss in the punch bowl.

Start a new thread. And BoarEd was/is fun. He even got kicked out of the club. and it was comedy gold. Good times indeed.

And you cannot get any better comic relief than Vox's famous Ohhhhh kitty pic and being called doo doo bird window licker tards.

He should change it up to gazoo popping in and calling everyone dum dum's.

quote:

---

Then what's the problem? Shouldn't we be getting to the bottom of any manner of corruption and dealing with it appropriately?

---

I didn't say otherwise. I am saying that Q, after being dead wrong when specific, became vague and of really little use. The goofy specifics came from those obsessed with that thread.

quote:

---

I say bring back the Q thread in its entirety... It was absolute gold toward the end..

---

.

I still have a bookmarked link to the thread. It just takes you to Trending Topics now.

quote:

---

I am saying that Q, after being dead wrong when specific, became vague and of really little use. The goofy specifics came from those obsessed with that thread.

---

What would you have liked them to say?

Walk us through this. Let's buy into the premise and have you armchair QB this bad boy.

What would a team of Donald Trump, at least 7 military leaders and 2-3 trusted civilians need to say via a relatively obscure online backchannel in order to plant the seeds of a digital counterinsurgency that combats the hostile takeover of the US government and legacy media apparatus hellbent for leather to provide narrative cover for them?

Tell us how you would do it, or at a minimum how it would need to be framed to earn your trust?

Do make sure to follow federal guidelines with respect to classified information, please. Can't try to wake up the masses while breaking every NATSEC law on the books, you know.

quote:

---

You guys are gonna drive yourselves insane

---

too late

They're always full of answers when they're regurgitating the MSNBC/DU talking points.

So a sitting president covered up information that would paint one particular presidential candidate in a negative light in order help influence the outcome of an election?

And then blamed it on Russia?

And then people on message boards patted each other on the back as they all assured each other that nothing would ever happen as a result?

Curious.