- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
WAPO- “Trump’s lawyers shouldn’t be allowed to use bogus arguments on impeachment”
Posted on 1/20/20 at 7:30 am
Posted on 1/20/20 at 7:30 am
I’m not paying WAPO, but here’s the link if you don’t believe me.
Wapo Link by Tyrant
If one more idiot Leftist tries to tell me that he wants to violate someone’s right to counsel to honor the constitution I’m going to fricking lose it
Wapo Link by Tyrant
If one more idiot Leftist tries to tell me that he wants to violate someone’s right to counsel to honor the constitution I’m going to fricking lose it
18
Posted on 1/20/20 at 7:31 am to Wednesday
wait
what?
what?
Posted on 1/20/20 at 7:33 am to SlowFlowPro
Yes, the actual position of the Washington Post is:
That is a direct quote.
These people are fricking insane.
quote:
Trump’s lawyers shouldn’t be allowed to use bogus arguments on impeachment
That is a direct quote.
These people are fricking insane.
Posted on 1/20/20 at 7:33 am to Wednesday
How dare they do anything effective to defend him!
Did Chairman Mao allow defense witnesses in his show trials?
Did Chairman Mao allow defense witnesses in his show trials?
Posted on 1/20/20 at 7:34 am to Wednesday
quote:
”Any number of such violations of the public trust — such as working with foreign governments in ways that make the president beholden to their leaders, or cooperating with those governments to bolster the president’s reelection — clearly must be impeachable even though they might violate no criminal law and indeed no federal statute at all”.
I wonder if pallets of cash in the middle of the night fall under this?
Posted on 1/20/20 at 7:39 am to Wednesday
Bogus arguments... like trying to Impeach a President on charges that aren't actually criminal?
Posted on 1/20/20 at 7:43 am to Wednesday
So, they are admitting what Trump and his side is saying is effective, so it isn’t fair.
It isn’t like bogus arguments were used to make the actual impeachment articles. Oh wait...
It isn’t like bogus arguments were used to make the actual impeachment articles. Oh wait...
Posted on 1/20/20 at 7:46 am to Wednesday
So what he is saying is every Democrats Wet Dream. We can get rid of Drumph because we don’t like him and he’s a bad Guy. But this is exactly what the Founders warned us about and not to do And the the Dims have opened Pandora’s box.
This post was edited on 1/20/20 at 7:47 am
Posted on 1/20/20 at 7:47 am to KingOrange
Still requires a supermajority to do it unless they do some frickery to get around that.
If that happens, what is happening in Virginia will only be a warmup for the main event.
If that happens, what is happening in Virginia will only be a warmup for the main event.
Posted on 1/20/20 at 7:48 am to Wednesday
I am getting subscription-walled. What specific arguments are bogus?
That the impeachment standard of "high crimes and misdemeanors" requires actual crimes and misdemeanors?
That the impeachment standard of "high crimes and misdemeanors" requires actual crimes and misdemeanors?
Posted on 1/20/20 at 7:49 am to PhDoogan
Apparently they have decided whether “pissing me off” is a felony or misdemeanor.
This post was edited on 1/20/20 at 7:50 am
Posted on 1/20/20 at 7:50 am to thebigmuffaletta
quote:I think someone left this out of my copy of the Constitution.
”Any number of such violations of the public trust — such as working with foreign governments in ways that make the president beholden to their leaders, or cooperating with those governments to bolster the president’s reelection — clearly must be impeachable even though they might violate no criminal law and indeed no federal statute at all”.
Posted on 1/20/20 at 7:51 am to PhDoogan
No one can use their bogus tactics. That's the law.
Posted on 1/20/20 at 7:52 am to Wednesday
In other words, an impeachable offense is anything THEY say it is.
Posted on 1/20/20 at 7:52 am to BamaFan365
Armor piercing question -
If this is impeachable, then why wasn’t selling tech to China amongst the impeachment articles against Bill Clinton?
There was tons of proof he and Gore were doing it in exchange for campaign contributions in 1996.
If this is impeachable, then why wasn’t selling tech to China amongst the impeachment articles against Bill Clinton?
There was tons of proof he and Gore were doing it in exchange for campaign contributions in 1996.
Posted on 1/20/20 at 8:01 am to Wednesday
quote:
should not be allowed to use bogus legal arguments to mislead the American public
In the last sentence of the article...what a hypocritical bunch of crap.
Posted on 1/20/20 at 8:29 am to Wednesday
quote:
That is a direct quote.
Do they really think that Trump is just going to roll over while the Dems screw him?
Posted on 1/20/20 at 8:31 am to Wednesday
quote:
Trump’s lawyers shouldn’t be allowed to use bogus arguments on impeachment
Bill and Ted unequivocally disagree.
Posted on 1/20/20 at 9:04 am to Wednesday
Counter point, the Dems shouldn't be allowed to use bogus charges to file articles of impeachment.
Posted on 1/20/20 at 9:07 am to Wednesday
Sounds like something authoritarians would say.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News