- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 1/7/22 at 10:37 am to loogaroo
exactly
Posted on 1/7/22 at 10:37 am to Oates Mustache
quote:SOmeone has info on him he doesn't want out and has to rule a certain way to keep it quiet.
he's a done deal.
Posted on 1/7/22 at 10:38 am to Indefatigable
quote:
The Court has no authority to interfere with policy determinations made within an executive agencies lawful parameters granted by Congress.
When that "policy determination" puts workers AT SEVERE RISK, then YES, the Court does have the authority to interfere. And, CLEARLY, forcing employees to get the jab put them at a severe risk -- at least as severe as Covid itself.
Posted on 1/7/22 at 10:39 am to MMauler
Then people can get the shot. And not be in severe danger. It will still spread even after everyone had 2948392 shots each.
Posted on 1/7/22 at 10:39 am to tigafan4life
Did Alito just drop common sense?
OSHA rules typically only supposed to affect employees at work but this one will affect them outside of work.
Seems like a slam dunk rebuttal.
OSHA rules typically only supposed to affect employees at work but this one will affect them outside of work.
Seems like a slam dunk rebuttal.
Posted on 1/7/22 at 10:39 am to Oates Mustache
lets say SCOTUS says they can mandate unvaxed to mask-up. what is the definition of unvaxed? 2 jabs or 2 jabs and all the boosters?
Posted on 1/7/22 at 10:39 am to cajunangelle
"encouraging" vaccinations 
"minimal risk"
"minimal risk"
This post was edited on 1/7/22 at 10:40 am
Posted on 1/7/22 at 10:39 am to jcaz
She's getting burned here.
Posted on 1/7/22 at 10:39 am to Oates Mustache
Damn good comparison...
Can OSHA mandate safety outside of the work place
Can OSHA mandate safety outside of the work place
Posted on 1/7/22 at 10:39 am to Jimmy2shoes
I like the wand analogy whoever is asking that one.
Posted on 1/7/22 at 10:40 am to loogaroo
quote:
It's like a valley girl on crack.
She's also spouting lies as fact. She's spouting statistics that have been proven false. I don't like her and I don't even know her. Her voice is grating and annoying. It's like listening to a petulant 20 year old that thinks she has all the answers to the world, all of which have been tried and failed.
Posted on 1/7/22 at 10:40 am to Lsut81
I said that when Biden first said this shite. Osha shite stops when I leave work.
Posted on 1/7/22 at 10:40 am to Landmass
I hope he doubles down with "So should OSHA be held liable for adverse reactions"
Posted on 1/7/22 at 10:40 am to jcaz
Should be open and shut after hearing that.
Posted on 1/7/22 at 10:40 am to MMauler
quote:
When that "policy determination" puts workers AT SEVERE RISK, then YES, the Court does have the authority to interfere. And, CLEARLY, forcing employees to get the jab put them at a severe risk -- at least as severe as Covid itself.
I am against this mandate but that is nonsense and not true in any, shape, or form.
Still, OSHA does not have the authority to issue this mandate. At all.
Nor is it necessary to do so.
Posted on 1/7/22 at 10:41 am to Lsut81
Get her a body bag. She just got slammed and now the Hog jumps in to save her.
This post was edited on 1/7/22 at 10:41 am
Posted on 1/7/22 at 10:41 am to Lsut81
Potentially dying is a very minimal risk!
Posted on 1/7/22 at 10:41 am to Lsut81
He's picking her apart...
Posted on 1/7/22 at 10:41 am to Landmass
We are back to "DO NO HARM"
It's like everyone forgot about that.
It's like everyone forgot about that.
Page 13 of 27
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News