Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Twitter's Dorsey says they screwed the pooch on NYPost story

Posted on 10/14/20 at 9:05 pm
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54202 posts
Posted on 10/14/20 at 9:05 pm
I don't Twitter. Is it now being allowed?

quote:

Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey addressed the controversy surrounding actions the company took on Wednesday to block the spread of a New York Post article critical of Hunter Biden, calling them "unacceptable."

"Our communication around our actions on the @nypost article was not great," he tweeted. "And blocking URL sharing via tweet or DM with zero context as to why we’re blocking: unacceptable."

He was also asked by Dave Rubin on the same Twitter thread if the company shadow bans certain users in an attempt to stifle their online influence due to their political beliefs, and Dorsey only replied, "No."

Twitter had issued a statement about the incident earlier in the day after Fox News reached out about the story.

The tech giant claimed it took action against the article due to the company's "Hacked Materials Policy." Twitter is blocking the post from being shared on its platform.

"In line with our Hacked Materials Policy, as well as our approach to blocking URLs, we are taking action to block any links to or images of the material in question on Twitter," a spokesperson said.

News of Dorsey's comments come after Rep. Ken Buck, R-Colo., sent a letter to the Department of Justice asking that it look into the censorship tactics employed by both Twitter and Facebook -- which had also taken steps to limit the article's reach while intimating that the story needed fact-checking.

He also suggested revoking the prosecutorial immunity enjoyed by big tech companies, after repeated complaints about their handling of political speech and their apparent disregard for the First Amendment.

"I write to express my concerns regarding Twitter and Facebook’s recent actions to censor a prominent American news outlet," Buck began. "These actions violate the platform’s immunity under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act and threaten to chill free speech throughout our nation."


LINK
This post was edited on 10/14/20 at 9:08 pm
Posted by Bulldogblitz
In my house
Member since Dec 2018
26774 posts
Posted on 10/14/20 at 9:07 pm to
They let wild and unfounded allegations go in only one direction
Posted by LSUGrrrl
Frisco, TX
Member since Jul 2007
32796 posts
Posted on 10/14/20 at 9:07 pm to
They still aren’t allowing the news story to be shred. They are only saying they should have explained why when it was banned.
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54202 posts
Posted on 10/14/20 at 9:11 pm to
quote:

They are only saying they should have explained why when it was banned.


So are they letting people even talk about it with their tweets? Wasn't those type tweets getting scrubbed earlier?
Posted by AMS
Member since Apr 2016
6495 posts
Posted on 10/14/20 at 9:14 pm to
quote:

Wasn't those type tweets getting scrubbed earlier?



fact checkers: this notion is false. twitter isnt using a sponge to remove tweets.
Posted by m57
Flyover Country
Member since May 2017
2069 posts
Posted on 10/14/20 at 9:16 pm to
LMAO at that commie saying they don't shadowban anyone. Pretty much any conservative on twitter has been shadownbanned.
Posted by 14&Counting
Eugene, OR
Member since Jul 2012
37575 posts
Posted on 10/14/20 at 9:16 pm to
Section 230
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54202 posts
Posted on 10/14/20 at 9:18 pm to
quote:

Section 230


I have no idea what that means.
Posted by CGSC Lobotomy
Member since Sep 2011
79952 posts
Posted on 10/14/20 at 9:20 pm to
quote:

I have no idea what that means.


Section 230 protects a PLATFORM from liability resulting from how it is used.
Posted by Lsudx256
DFW
Member since Mar 2016
2911 posts
Posted on 10/14/20 at 9:22 pm to
I have been banned for 2 weeks because I retweeted Pro-Trump stuff. I responded to some Libs BS but never threatened, cussed, or broke any rules. They say I’m a bot and won’t allow me to unlock. Ridiculous.
Posted by TigerFanatic99
South Bend, Indiana
Member since Jan 2007
27469 posts
Posted on 10/14/20 at 9:23 pm to
As stated, they aren't changing anything, just recognizing they should have been transparent about why they were banning it.
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54202 posts
Posted on 10/14/20 at 9:25 pm to
quote:

Section 230 protects a PLATFORM from liability resulting from how it is used.


Thanks. So who would be liable here, Twitter I assume, and from whom should they be afraid of being sued, the Biden's?
Posted by Icansee4miles
Trolling the Tickfaw
Member since Jan 2007
29148 posts
Posted on 10/14/20 at 9:33 pm to
And Rep. Buck is from fruitcake Colorado?? Salute that man. Bigly.
Posted by Corso
Atlanta
Member since Feb 2020
10556 posts
Posted on 10/14/20 at 11:13 pm to
I'm assuming they blocked all the random Trump-Russia stuff according to that policy right???
Posted by tide06
Member since Oct 2011
11131 posts
Posted on 10/14/20 at 11:23 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/9/21 at 1:49 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram