- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Twitter's Dorsey says they screwed the pooch on NYPost story
Posted on 10/14/20 at 9:05 pm
Posted on 10/14/20 at 9:05 pm
I don't Twitter. Is it now being allowed?
LINK
quote:
Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey addressed the controversy surrounding actions the company took on Wednesday to block the spread of a New York Post article critical of Hunter Biden, calling them "unacceptable."
"Our communication around our actions on the @nypost article was not great," he tweeted. "And blocking URL sharing via tweet or DM with zero context as to why we’re blocking: unacceptable."
He was also asked by Dave Rubin on the same Twitter thread if the company shadow bans certain users in an attempt to stifle their online influence due to their political beliefs, and Dorsey only replied, "No."
Twitter had issued a statement about the incident earlier in the day after Fox News reached out about the story.
The tech giant claimed it took action against the article due to the company's "Hacked Materials Policy." Twitter is blocking the post from being shared on its platform.
"In line with our Hacked Materials Policy, as well as our approach to blocking URLs, we are taking action to block any links to or images of the material in question on Twitter," a spokesperson said.
News of Dorsey's comments come after Rep. Ken Buck, R-Colo., sent a letter to the Department of Justice asking that it look into the censorship tactics employed by both Twitter and Facebook -- which had also taken steps to limit the article's reach while intimating that the story needed fact-checking.
He also suggested revoking the prosecutorial immunity enjoyed by big tech companies, after repeated complaints about their handling of political speech and their apparent disregard for the First Amendment.
"I write to express my concerns regarding Twitter and Facebook’s recent actions to censor a prominent American news outlet," Buck began. "These actions violate the platform’s immunity under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act and threaten to chill free speech throughout our nation."
LINK
This post was edited on 10/14/20 at 9:08 pm
Posted on 10/14/20 at 9:07 pm to Homesick Tiger
They let wild and unfounded allegations go in only one direction
Posted on 10/14/20 at 9:07 pm to Homesick Tiger
They still aren’t allowing the news story to be shred. They are only saying they should have explained why when it was banned.
Posted on 10/14/20 at 9:11 pm to LSUGrrrl
quote:
They are only saying they should have explained why when it was banned.
So are they letting people even talk about it with their tweets? Wasn't those type tweets getting scrubbed earlier?
Posted on 10/14/20 at 9:14 pm to Homesick Tiger
quote:
Wasn't those type tweets getting scrubbed earlier?
fact checkers: this notion is false. twitter isnt using a sponge to remove tweets.
Posted on 10/14/20 at 9:16 pm to AMS
LMAO at that commie saying they don't shadowban anyone. Pretty much any conservative on twitter has been shadownbanned.
Posted on 10/14/20 at 9:18 pm to 14&Counting
quote:
Section 230
I have no idea what that means.
Posted on 10/14/20 at 9:20 pm to Homesick Tiger
quote:
I have no idea what that means.
Section 230 protects a PLATFORM from liability resulting from how it is used.
Posted on 10/14/20 at 9:22 pm to m57
I have been banned for 2 weeks because I retweeted Pro-Trump stuff. I responded to some Libs BS but never threatened, cussed, or broke any rules. They say I’m a bot and won’t allow me to unlock. Ridiculous.
Posted on 10/14/20 at 9:23 pm to Homesick Tiger
As stated, they aren't changing anything, just recognizing they should have been transparent about why they were banning it.
Posted on 10/14/20 at 9:25 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
Section 230 protects a PLATFORM from liability resulting from how it is used.
Thanks. So who would be liable here, Twitter I assume, and from whom should they be afraid of being sued, the Biden's?
Posted on 10/14/20 at 9:33 pm to Homesick Tiger
And Rep. Buck is from fruitcake Colorado?? Salute that man. Bigly.
Posted on 10/14/20 at 11:13 pm to Homesick Tiger
I'm assuming they blocked all the random Trump-Russia stuff according to that policy right???
Posted on 10/14/20 at 11:23 pm to Corso
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/9/21 at 1:49 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News