View in: Desktop
Copyright @2023 TigerDroppings.com. All rights reserved.
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Posted by
Message
Trumps preposterous defense in the purloined documents case--Reason
Posted by I B Freeman on 9/22/23 at 4:53 am

Trumps preposterous defense in documents trial
quote:
While the other three indictments against Trump face formidable obstacles, including controversial legal interpretations, complicated narratives, and difficult questions of knowledge and intent, the story behind the documents case is relatively straightforward: Trump took a bunch of stuff that did not belong to him and refused to return it.
This post was edited on 9/22 at 4:55 am
re: Trumps preposterous defense in the purloined documents case--ReasonPosted by Diamondawg
on 9/22/23 at 5:04 am to I B Freeman

Put it in legal terms, citing statutes, ramifications, possible jail terms, etc. Maybe you could get Xi to splain it to you,
re: Trumps preposterous defense in the purloined documents case--ReasonPosted by ChineseBandit58
on 9/22/23 at 5:04 am to I B Freeman

well bless your heart
and I mean that in the most disrespectful and cynical way I can muster.

and I mean that in the most disrespectful and cynical way I can muster.
re: Trumps preposterous defense in the purloined documents case--ReasonPosted by Stealth Matrix
on 9/22/23 at 5:12 am to I B Freeman

K, now examine Xiden's secure garage.
re: Trumps preposterous defense in the purloined documents case--ReasonPosted by POTUS2024
on 9/22/23 at 5:20 am to I B Freeman

The Mar A Lago documents case is easily the strongest one against Trump. His primary defense is "other people did it" and "I had authority but can't demonstrate that I invoked it". Lack of discipline and ego got him in that mess and he's going to be guilty on that one. The rest I think only find him guilty if there's a biased jury. But, on this one, he did it to himself and the worst part might be that he knew there was a double standard in place when he did it.
re: Trumps preposterous defense in the purloined documents case--ReasonPosted by thebigmuffaletta on 9/22/23 at 5:45 am to I B Freeman
Who did you vote for?
re: Trumps preposterous defense in the purloined documents case--ReasonPosted by LuckyTiger
on 9/22/23 at 5:48 am to I B Freeman


re: Trumps preposterous defense in the purloined documents case--ReasonPosted by Diamondawg
on 9/22/23 at 5:50 am to POTUS2024

quote:Probably. But, there seems to have been a bunch of prosecutorial misconduct going on with the over zealous prosecutors. Isn't this the one where they implied they might could "move along a judgeship application" for one of the attorneys? Might get tossed but I would imagine they would refile with a different grand jury.
The Mar A Lago documents case is easily the strongest one against Trump
re: Trumps preposterous defense in the purloined documents case--ReasonPosted by SouthEasternKaiju
on 9/22/23 at 5:51 am to I B Freeman

No matter how many paragraphs and articles pumped out by the MSM, the simple fact is this.
Trump, as President, can pretty much do as he pleases with regards to his admin's files.
Just like every other President before him did.
Joe, was VP, had no such powers.
Total and complete nothingburger to hide the Establishment's corruption. Straight up.
Trump, as President, can pretty much do as he pleases with regards to his admin's files.
Just like every other President before him did.
Joe, was VP, had no such powers.
Total and complete nothingburger to hide the Establishment's corruption. Straight up.
This post was edited on 9/22 at 5:52 am
re: Trumps preposterous defense in the purloined documents case--ReasonPosted by I B Freeman on 9/22/23 at 5:54 am to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
Trump, as President, can pretty much do as he pleases with regards to his admin's files.
He was not President when he refused to answer a subpoena to return the documents.
It is simple.
TD Sponsor
TD Fan
USA
Member since 2001

USA
Member since 2001
Thank you for supporting our sponsors Posted by Site Sponsor
to Everyone


Advertisement
re: Trumps preposterous defense in the purloined documents case--ReasonPosted by I B Freeman on 9/22/23 at 5:57 am to POTUS2024
It was really stupid on Trumps part to start this fight.
It is a very good example of the dangers to us all that man with such a flawed ego has such power.
It is a very good example of the dangers to us all that man with such a flawed ego has such power.
re: Trumps preposterous defense in the purloined documents case--ReasonPosted by I B Freeman on 9/22/23 at 6:01 am to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
articles pumped out by the MSM
Defined by cultist as any written or spoken word critical of Trump.
To infer Reason is mainstream media proves the cult is blind.
re: Trumps preposterous defense in the purloined documents case--ReasonPosted by Gifman
on 9/22/23 at 6:12 am to I B Freeman

quote:
reason.com

re: Trumps preposterous defense in the purloined documents case--ReasonPosted by SouthEasternKaiju
on 9/22/23 at 6:13 am to I B Freeman

quote:
It was really stupid on Trumps part to start this fight.
He didn't. All he did was do what he was legally allowed.
The fight started when the Deep State first illegally spied on a US citizen then sitting US President, followed by a false claim of colluding with Russians.
Trump was keeping evidence that clears him against the gov's illegal coup against his 1st term.
re: Trumps preposterous defense in the purloined documents case--ReasonPosted by SouthEasternKaiju
on 9/22/23 at 6:14 am to I B Freeman

I'm not inferring anything.
I'm stating it as stone-cold fact.
I'm stating it as stone-cold fact.
re: Trumps preposterous defense in the purloined documents case--ReasonPosted by CamdenTiger on 9/22/23 at 6:22 am to I B Freeman
quote:
He was not President when he refused to answer a subpoena to return the documents
If it was under his administration, then the law will support his keeping those documents, like the precedent under previous rulings
re: Trumps preposterous defense in the purloined documents case--ReasonPosted by Gifman
on 9/22/23 at 6:28 am to CamdenTiger

quote:
If it was under his administration, then the law will support his keeping those documents, like the precedent under previous rulings
Stop using reason in your arguments. We're trying to hate on Trump.
re: Trumps preposterous defense in the purloined documents case--ReasonPosted by I B Freeman on 9/22/23 at 7:09 am to Gifman
BS. There is no law on his side on this issue.
Lying to investigators is obstruction of justice.
It is not hard for objective readers to understand.
Lying to investigators is obstruction of justice.
It is not hard for objective readers to understand.
re: Trumps preposterous defense in the purloined documents case--ReasonPosted by I B Freeman on 9/22/23 at 7:09 am to SouthEasternKaiju
I know.
amazing
amazing
re: Trumps preposterous defense in the purloined documents case--ReasonPosted by Vacherie Saint
on 9/22/23 at 7:10 am to I B Freeman

Ni hao loser
Popular
Back to top
