Started By
Message

re: Trump: Tariffs Could Replace Income Tax

Posted on 9/3/25 at 12:57 pm to
Posted by VABuckeye
NOVA
Member since Dec 2007
38283 posts
Posted on 9/3/25 at 12:57 pm to
quote:

WTF? let's just make shiite up at this point.


Most of what comes out of the mouths of this administration is made up on the spot.
Posted by GRTiger
On a roof eating alligator pie
Member since Dec 2008
71242 posts
Posted on 9/3/25 at 12:58 pm to
quote:

There is no way tariff revenue can fund the current behemoth.


We don't need it to or want it to.
Posted by GrassyKnoll556
Member since Feb 2025
322 posts
Posted on 9/3/25 at 12:58 pm to
quote:

What he doesn’t seem to understand though, is that the federal budget was tiny in 1913. A literally fraction of a fraction of what it is today. There is no way tariff revenue can fund the current behemoth.


This is what you all don't understand:

THAT'S THE frickING POINT.
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
77805 posts
Posted on 9/3/25 at 1:00 pm to
quote:

You tell your creditors that you don't actually owe them what they think you do and that faith dies.

That's only true in the case where both parties are operating in good faith. Trump's comments on this in February indicate a significant amount of fraud on the part of the Federal Reserve.

If your bank says you owe 10X what you should on a car/home loan and you can prove that you don't owe that much, it doesn't make you untrustworthy for being the victim of fraud.
Posted by AGGIES
Member since Jul 2021
12417 posts
Posted on 9/3/25 at 1:00 pm to
What specifics were provided?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477368 posts
Posted on 9/3/25 at 1:06 pm to
quote:

This is what you all don't understand:

THAT'S THE frickING POINT.


It doesn't appear the Trump admin understands the point, either.

Where is their budget with all of these spending cuts?
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
82449 posts
Posted on 9/3/25 at 1:08 pm to
quote:

That would require amending the constitution.


No. The 16th Amendment permits but does not mandate an income tax.
Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
41138 posts
Posted on 9/3/25 at 1:08 pm to
quote:

VoxDawg
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477368 posts
Posted on 9/3/25 at 1:08 pm to
quote:

Trump's comments on this in February indicate a significant amount of fraud on the part of the Federal Reserve.



quote:

If your bank says you owe 10X what you should on a car/home loan and you can prove that you don't owe that much, it doesn't make you untrustworthy for being the victim of fraud.

But the debt isn't even based on "the federal reserve" reporting the data.

You do understand this, right? Or is this another thing where you jump in ignorantly because charlatans led you to dishonesty?

The CBO reports this data annually. Here is the 2023 breakdown

It even has pictures for people like you

Posted by LSUFreek
Greater New Orleans
Member since Jan 2007
16313 posts
Posted on 9/3/25 at 1:10 pm to
In 2008, Ron Paul said if you eliminate the personal income tax, the US would still bring in enough revenue from other taxes & tariffs that would equal what the US collected in all of the year 2000, which included the personal income tax.

Paul said the income tax is just a relatively small fraction of what the US collects as a whole. It can easily be done away/replaced with overdue federal spending cuts and increased tariffs/various-taxes. There's no excuse to keep robbing individual earnings via the threat of prison to feed a federal budget "behemoth" that could be manageable with some amputations & tariffs.
This post was edited on 9/3/25 at 1:12 pm
Posted by Ten Bears
Florida
Member since Oct 2018
5076 posts
Posted on 9/3/25 at 1:11 pm to
quote:

It doesn't appear the Trump admin understands the point, either.

Where is their budget with all of these spending cuts?


It's coming...


muh rescissions are just around the corner.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477368 posts
Posted on 9/3/25 at 1:12 pm to
quote:

Paul said the income tax is just a relatively small fraction of what the US collects as a whole.

In 2023 it was about half. I don't think that's small.

quote:

In 2008, Ron Paul said if you eliminate the personal income tax, the US would still bring in enough revenue from other taxes & tariffs that would equal what the US collected in all of the year 2000, which included the personal income tax.

That seems to be more a statement of GDP growth than anything else
Posted by Figgy
CenCal
Member since May 2020
10357 posts
Posted on 9/3/25 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

quote:
What he doesn’t seem to understand though, is that the federal budget was tiny in 1913. A literally fraction of a fraction of what it is today. There is no way tariff revenue can fund the current behemoth.


This is what you all don't understand:

THAT'S THE frickING POINT.


That's fine. So what can realistically be cut so that they could? I want smaller government. But who is willing to fall on that sword and sacrifice themselves to get there? How many programs can be be cut? Can SS, Medicare or the Def Dept do with less? I would certainly hope so.
Posted by Ten Bears
Florida
Member since Oct 2018
5076 posts
Posted on 9/3/25 at 1:16 pm to
quote:


In 2008, Ron Paul said if you eliminate the personal income tax, the US would still bring in enough revenue from other taxes & tariffs that would equal what the US collected in all of the year 2000, which included the personal income tax.

Paul said the income tax is just a relatively small fraction of what the US collects as a whole. It can easily be done away/replaced with overdue federal spending cuts and increased tariffs/various-taxes. There's no excuse to keep robbing individual earnings via the threat of prison to feed a federal budget "behemoth" that could be manageable with some amputations & tariffs.


I mean, you do know that Ron Paul is vehemently anti-tariff. In fact Ron Paul had the EXACT OPPOSITE opinion that you claim.

In 2025, his article "Tariffs are Theft", Ron Paul wrote

Defenders of tariffs, including President Trump, claim the revenue from tariffs can be used to “offset” the revenue government loses from tax cuts. Some even claim that tariffs can generate enough revenue to allow the government to repeal the income tax. The problem with this is that a tariff brings in more revenue to “pay for” tax cuts only to the extent the tariff does not cause consumers to cease buying imported goods. Thus, the tariffs, to bring revenue to the government, must not be large enough to discourage Americans from buying foreign products. The more tariffs increase government revenue, the more they will tend to fail in bringing about another often promoted tariff goal — an increase in the purchase of domestic goods.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 9/3/25 at 1:18 pm to
quote:


Trump did not say that. I could easily burn down that strawman too.


So, his taxes will result in higher prices and more take home pay.

No one wins, but government.
Posted by Kjnstkmn
Vermilion Parish
Member since Aug 2020
21954 posts
Posted on 9/3/25 at 1:19 pm to
Plan is to put all government spending on the blockchain so it can be transparently observed and tracked by all interested citizens as it occurs transparently.



They just put the last state of the economy report data on the blockchain recently.

Have to reign in all of the fraud, waste, and abuse pro-actively in real time in addition to cutting down to smaller government if we want to be able to replace income taxes with tariffs.

Things like the fed government taking partial ownership of companies it bails out (Intel), and patents from inventions made in fed funded schools ( both in the news lately) will also help replace taxes to fill the coffers.


Multi-pronged attack.





Property taxes going away soon as well:

Replaced by new State Credit Unions

See 2nd edition released recently:

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.



Offering 3% interest on all mortgages, auto loans, and credit cards.


Bankers, learn to code
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 9/3/25 at 1:20 pm to
quote:


Sure, if that's as deep as you're capable of thinking about this issue.



Lay it out for me slick.

If youre getting robust tariff income, youre not deterring foreign purchases.
Posted by Kjnstkmn
Vermilion Parish
Member since Aug 2020
21954 posts
Posted on 9/3/25 at 1:21 pm to
dup
This post was edited on 9/3/25 at 1:28 pm
Posted by VABuckeye
NOVA
Member since Dec 2007
38283 posts
Posted on 9/3/25 at 1:28 pm to
quote:

Where is their budget with all of these spending cuts?


It's September. How many departments have submitted a fiscal budget for the year? I'm fairly sure it's a low number. So, there is no budget.
Posted by LB84
Member since May 2016
4531 posts
Posted on 9/3/25 at 1:29 pm to
quote:

the federal budget was tiny in 1913. A literally fraction of a fraction of what it is today.


Back when America was great and most of the bandwagon hoppers hadn't come here yet.
This post was edited on 9/3/25 at 1:32 pm
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram