- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Tom Fitton Says IGNORE THE PARDONS, PROSECUTE
Posted on 1/20/25 at 2:37 pm
Posted on 1/20/25 at 2:37 pm
Posted on 1/20/25 at 2:39 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
The better strategy would to have state prosecutors go after them like they did against Trump.
Posted on 1/20/25 at 2:41 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Posted on 1/20/25 at 2:42 pm to LSUwag
I just want to see them all squirm and have to admit to everything they did. If they are pardoned the. I don’t care if the go to jail. I just want the truth to come out. I feel this has to be done to turn down the temperature with all of the TDS people going forward
Posted on 1/20/25 at 2:43 pm to VoxDawg
If there was no crime committed then the part in the ceremonial
Either way you can't prosecute. If there was a crime then it's part and if there was not a crime there's nothing to prosecute
Either way you can't prosecute. If there was a crime then it's part and if there was not a crime there's nothing to prosecute
Posted on 1/20/25 at 2:43 pm to LSUwag
quote:
The better strategy would to have state prosecutors go after them like they did against Trump.
Why not both…Force them to use up their ill gotten gains on legal fees if nothing else.
Posted on 1/20/25 at 2:43 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
I'd make someone prove to me that I could pardon someone without a known or proven crime committed. It seems insane to me.
Posted on 1/20/25 at 2:51 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
The same Tom Fitton that advised Trump not to cooperate with the National Archives, leading to a criminal indictment of Trump. Yeah, let’s keep listening to this guy.
Posted on 1/20/25 at 2:52 pm to Decatur
quote:
The same Tom Fitton that advised Trump not to cooperate with the National Archives, leading to a criminal indictment of Trump.
they were going to indict him regardless idiot

Posted on 1/20/25 at 2:53 pm to SlowFlowPro
“ except in cases of impeachment “
While I would believe it is for those who have committed a possible violation that can be deem impeachable I’m curious enough to see if it could also be used against those who seek out an impeachment using false accusations or fabricated evidence such as Liz Cheney has done
While I would believe it is for those who have committed a possible violation that can be deem impeachable I’m curious enough to see if it could also be used against those who seek out an impeachment using false accusations or fabricated evidence such as Liz Cheney has done
Posted on 1/20/25 at 2:54 pm to LSUwag
The problem is no AG in a Blue State will go after these people.
Posted on 1/20/25 at 2:54 pm to SlowFlowPro
This board is wasting time melting down over the pardons.
I think the COVID stuff is complicated and they would never make anything stick against Fauci.
Was the J6 committee devious and a TV show? Yes. Criminal? IDK.
The only thing I am still super butthurt over and want retribution for is Russiagate. But, the best we got is Durham, and I would guess the statute of limitations has passed on most of the dirty deeds.
I think the COVID stuff is complicated and they would never make anything stick against Fauci.
Was the J6 committee devious and a TV show? Yes. Criminal? IDK.
The only thing I am still super butthurt over and want retribution for is Russiagate. But, the best we got is Durham, and I would guess the statute of limitations has passed on most of the dirty deeds.
Posted on 1/20/25 at 2:55 pm to SlowFlowPro
did you misspell "part" and mean pardon
Posted on 1/20/25 at 2:58 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
If there was a crime then it's part and if there was not a crime there's nothing to prosecute
How can you determine if a crime did or did not exist if an investigation was not conducted?
Just curious.
Posted on 1/20/25 at 3:01 pm to SlowFlowPro
Can a person with dementia enter a binding contract?
Posted on 1/20/25 at 3:02 pm to Bunk Moreland
quote:
Was the J6 committee devious and a TV show? Yes. Criminal? IDK.
Definitely criminal. At a minimum, Frauds Against the United States.
Posted on 1/20/25 at 3:06 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
I would argue that unless a crime was identified by the President, no pardon occurred.
Posted on 1/20/25 at 3:09 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Fitton does realize that he's not a lawyer? His organization can file whatever they chose. Does not mean it has merit from a legal standpoint. Presidents pardons is pretty absolute as it applies to the federal level.
Posted on 1/20/25 at 3:14 pm to KiwiHead
quote:
Presidents pardons is pretty absolute as it applies to the federal level.
I think everyone agrees with that. It's the blanket, preemptive pardons where the constitutionality gets murky.
This was a big issue during Ford's pardon of Nixon, but the country was ready to move on and no one challenged it - but it was discussed heavily and many scholars believed a blanket pardon for uncharged crimes was unconstitutional.
Posted on 1/20/25 at 3:14 pm to Wire Road 2
quote:
Why not both
This. Yes, going through the states is a way around them but blanket pardons covering 10 years for "no crimes" needs to be challenged or everyone will be doing it in the future.
It's complete bullshite, stop it now.
Remember in 2020 when the left said that Trump was going to do that and they said it was not possible?
Popular
Back to top
