- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
This tweet aged well, Mr. Schumer
Posted on 9/19/20 at 7:32 am
Posted on 9/19/20 at 7:32 am
10
Posted on 9/19/20 at 7:33 am to LSUTigerFan247
What goes around comes around.
Posted on 9/19/20 at 7:34 am to LSUTigerFan247
yeah but Hillary called into MSNBC to talk about hypocrisy if there is a nomination
#trusthillary
#trusthillary
Posted on 9/19/20 at 7:35 am to LSUTigerFan247
They can stamp the tweet on his head and will still ignore it.
Posted on 9/19/20 at 7:40 am to uppermidwestbama
quote:
They can stamp the tweet on his head and will still ignore it.
You know, this cuts both ways. In 2016 we said that we should not consider an appointment so close to an election. What’s our position now? It’s “might makes right”, just like Schumer’s.
Posted on 9/19/20 at 7:42 am to uppermidwestbama
quote:Schmucky ignores everything except what the chubby chick in the glasses puts on his index cards.
They can stamp the tweet on his head and will still ignore it.
Posted on 9/19/20 at 7:44 am to Penrod
Why would an opposition party confirm a judge who they have philosophical differences with when I a few months they could possibly confirm a judge that they don’t have those philosophical differences with? In this case, there are no philosophical differences between the suspected nominee and the controlling party in the Senate, so why should they wait to confirm someone they want?
Posted on 9/19/20 at 7:45 am to Penrod
quote:
You know, this cuts both ways. In 2016 we said that we should not consider an appointment so close to an election. What’s our position now? It’s “might makes right”, just like Schumer’s.
In 2016 the president was not eligible for reelection
Posted on 9/19/20 at 7:46 am to cssamerican
quote:
In this case, there are no philosophical differences between the suspected nominee and the controlling party in the Senate, so why should they wait to confirm someone they want?
Because
Waaaaah waaaaaah waaaaah
This isn't FAIR
Waaaaaaaaah
Only what I want to happen should happen!
Posted on 9/19/20 at 7:52 am to uppermidwestbama
quote:
They can stamp the tweet on his head and will still ignore it.
And of course if it played to the Dems benefit, the propaganda arm of the DNC, the MSM, would be hammering it home.
Posted on 9/19/20 at 8:04 am to LSUTigerFan247
17, huh?
Posted on 9/19/20 at 8:05 am to Penrod
quote:
What’s our position now? It’s “might makes right”, just like Schumer’s.
Hell fricking yeah
Posted on 9/19/20 at 8:12 am to LSUTigerFan247
I have few liberals on my social media feed, and I'm posting this tweet every time they complain about what the right was saying in 2016.
Posted on 9/19/20 at 8:14 am to noonan
quote:
I have few liberals on my social media feed
At times like these you can't even pay for that kinda entertainment
Posted on 9/19/20 at 8:38 am to Penrod
quote:Our and we, huh? Just another resident conservative bending over backwards to support leftists goals, all under the guise of being fair??!?!?
You know, this cuts both ways. In 2016 we said that we should not consider an appointment so close to an election. What’s our position now? It’s “might makes right”, just like Schumer’s.
GTFO with this garbage. I say we play by the rules. The rules state a president nominates and the senate confirms.
The YUGE differences between now and 2016 are as follows:
1. Obama was a lame duck president in 2016, trump is not in 2020
2. In 2016, president Obama was a democrat, the senate was held by the republicans. The senate is not obligated to confirm a president’s nomination, especially the other party’s president’s nomination. The prez in this circumstance must nominate a Compromise candidate if he wants the senate to consider his pick. Obama didn’t compromise. He nominated Merrick garland, a DC leftist, and Mitch McConnell and the Rs chose not to confirm him.
In 2020, the senate and White House are both aligned with the republicans, so the “compromise candidate” and “lame duck” excuses from 2016 ARE NOT RELEVANT
Fill the seat.
Posted on 9/19/20 at 8:40 am to LSUTigerFan247
Tell me that you tweeted that back to Schumer or found it on his twitter feed.
Posted on 9/19/20 at 8:40 am to Penrod
quote:
You know, this cuts both ways
you know that this is a political process, and we SHOULD have the votes
not confirming an appointee from t ghb e opposing party and then turning around and pushing your hit through is all part of the game
and it is a game
we need to move forward and do what is in our best inyerests
Posted on 9/19/20 at 8:42 am to Penrod
quote:
It’s “might makes right”,
Senate majority makes right.
Posted on 9/19/20 at 9:04 am to Penrod
quote:
In 2016 we said that we should not consider an appointment so close to an election - -
- - in the last term of a lame-duck POTUS.
You DEMliars always remove the most important element of ANY statement = CONTEXT.
Posted on 9/19/20 at 9:06 am to LSUTigerFan247
Karma
Page 1 of 2
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News