The US Supreme Court = liberal activists

Hate to say it, but it's true. They're all pretty liberal.

What decisions or votes by ACB and kav do you consider liberal?

PoliBoardApedia

Liberal - anyone who understands and correctly applies the law, rather than examining every issue through the lens of “what is best for Donald Trump”

Hate to say it, but it's true. They're all pretty liberal.

Liberal is being generous as to who these people are.

quote:

---

Not necessarily liberal, but their refusal to even hear cases on electoral fraud smacks of DC swamp creature and the left holds the keys to that world.

---

Probably more about self preservation than liberal vs conservative. No standing? I don't know. But not taking up after an inauguration? What if they found that the election was fraudulent? You think they are going to rule on kicking out a sitting President*? I believe they were afraid to delve into. I think I saw where Clarence dissented but is scared of nothing and nobody. Hell, he wants to retire anyway.

quote:

---

Hate to say it, but it's true. They're all pretty liberal.

---

I don't understand why it is so hard for these bozos in black robes to just follow the US Constitution. It isn't complicated.

Trumpism failed essentially because you can’t run a country on bluster and alpha grunts. It might feel good, but feelings don’t hold up against institutions hundreds of years old.

Eventually you have to let some smart people in the room, and those damn smart people are always going to put the tradition of the institution and the approval of their peers ahead of the political ideology that got them to that point.

It’s why Trump’s post-election legal team was such an embarrassment when Bush had the absolute best in Bush vs Gore.

quote:

---

Liberal - anyone who understands and correctly applies the law, rather than examining every issue through the lens of “what is best for Donald Trump”

---

It's weird how you mention Trump. If you read Thomas' dissent, he clearly says that not hearing the case is bad for all Americans. How long does TDS last? Is it a lifetime affliction?

Since the SC is often split, then obviously not even the top judges in the country all understand and correctly apply the law. How do you determine which group is doing it right? You just go with the majority, follow the crowd? Whichever lets you be the contrarian?

When a state seeks to alter its voting and counting methods outside the prescribed manner set forth by the legislature, you damn well better believe the highest court in the land should step in.