- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The UK government admits that vaccines have damaged the natural immune system
Posted on 1/15/22 at 8:53 am to ksayetiger
Posted on 1/15/22 at 8:53 am to ksayetiger
The unvaccinated, on the other hand, will gain lasting, if not permanent, immunity to all strains of the alleged virus after being naturally infected with it even once.
You know this is bullshite when you personally know unvaccinated people who have had covid multiple times. It's pretty clear by now that no one (on any side) knows WTF they are talking about when it comes to this virus.
You know this is bullshite when you personally know unvaccinated people who have had covid multiple times. It's pretty clear by now that no one (on any side) knows WTF they are talking about when it comes to this virus.
0
Posted on 1/15/22 at 8:56 am to ksayetiger
None of what you quoted is in the paper you linked. Fake News? Or did you link the wrong thing. Here is the excerpt:
quote:
Small increases in Roche N seropositivity have recently been observed across all age groups (Table 6) compared to the previous 12-week period. Increases in the overall COVID-19 case rates in England have been observed across all age groups and regions in week 40 (Weekly national Influenza and COVID-19 surveillance report week 41). Roche S seropositivity in blood donors has plateaued and is now over 96% across all age groups. Seropositivity estimates for S antibody in blood donors are likely to be higher than would be expected in the general population and this probably reflects the fact that donors are more likely to be vaccinated. Seropositivity estimates for N antibody will underestimate the proportion of the population previously infected due to (i) blood donors are potentially less likely to be exposed to natural infection than age matched individuals in the general population (ii) waning of the N antibody response over time and (iii) recent observations from UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) surveillance data that N antibody levels appear to be lower in individuals who acquire infection following 2 doses of vaccination. Vaccination has made an important contribution to the overall Roche S increases observed since the roll out of the vaccination programme, initially amongst individuals aged 50 years and above who were prioritised for vaccination as part of the phase 1 programme and more recently in younger adults as part of phase 2 of the vaccination programme.
This post was edited on 1/15/22 at 9:01 am
Posted on 1/15/22 at 8:57 am to WaWaWeeWa
quote:they all learned it from 'y'all'
Y’all really want the vaxxed to die really bad
Posted on 1/15/22 at 9:00 am to NK521
quote:
They have to continue to check the immune cells of vaccinated individuals for years to come.
Exactly what they should have done to approve these three leaky possibly dangerous vaccines.
O.Henry would be proud.
Posted on 1/15/22 at 9:01 am to Tigers2010a
quote:Yes, it does. It may not be at the levels touted, clearly it isn't, but it does. It induces the body's creation of antibodies for the virus.
Does the "vaccine" provide immunity? If not, it is not a vaccine
Posted on 1/15/22 at 9:02 am to Penrod
quote:No. He is simply a liar and propagandist.
None of what you quoted is in the paper you linked. Fake News? Or did you link the wrong thing
Posted on 1/15/22 at 9:12 am to ksayetiger
Michael Flynn is not a medical authority so his opinion on the UK data is irrelevant.
It's a shame that your misleading post takes away from an important question.
What is the reason for and the implications of N antibody levels appearring to be lower in people who become infected after two doses of vaccination?
It's a shame that your misleading post takes away from an important question.
What is the reason for and the implications of N antibody levels appearring to be lower in people who become infected after two doses of vaccination?
Posted on 1/15/22 at 9:14 am to WaWaWeeWa
The shot is useless....
Get over it. There is no help from Uncle Gubment anymore!
Get over it. There is no help from Uncle Gubment anymore!
Posted on 1/15/22 at 9:14 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
Say it with me… personal choice
It should be. But we're still seeing the push for it to not be, even with Omicron being little more than a bad cold in most cases.
Posted on 1/15/22 at 10:13 am to Jake88
It doesn’t keep the person from catching the virus nor does it stop the spread of the virus. They can change the definition all they want, but it isn’t a vaccine.
Posted on 1/15/22 at 11:06 am to ksayetiger
Where does it say that In the paper?
Posted on 1/15/22 at 12:24 pm to prplhze2000
The OP quotes appear to be the opinion of Michael Flynn as it is what he posted on telegram.
The link is to the weekly UK surveillance data of week 42 which states "N antibody levels appear to be lower in people who become infected after two doses of vaccination"
What we need is for actual medical experts to explain why this may be and what it could mean regarding immune system function.
Any docs in this thread that can shed some light?
The link is to the weekly UK surveillance data of week 42 which states "N antibody levels appear to be lower in people who become infected after two doses of vaccination"
What we need is for actual medical experts to explain why this may be and what it could mean regarding immune system function.
Any docs in this thread that can shed some light?
Page 3 of 3
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News