Started By
Message

re: The medical examiner who just testified was devastating to the prosecution

Posted on 4/9/21 at 9:55 pm to
Posted by WaWaWeeWa
Member since Oct 2015
15714 posts
Posted on 4/9/21 at 9:55 pm to
quote:

In someone with otherwise normal anatomy, you would expect soft tissue damage if someone were compressing the neck from the back to the extent that it caused airway compromise. You can do it but not without seriously damaging the anatomical structures in the neck. If there’s any argument to be made for pressure causing respiratory compromise, it would be from thoracic compression impeding the ability of his chest to expand. The knee on his neck is really a red herring, medically speaking. That’s not what killed him regardless of how he died.


Exactly. It’s not a complicated idea either.

The medical examiner stated very clearly today that the knee did not cause asphyxiation. We are quickly eliminating possibilities.
Posted by jwill37
The Chuck
Member since Jan 2007
1383 posts
Posted on 4/9/21 at 10:41 pm to
You’re 100% correct however it’s obvious they have no intention of giving Chauvin a fair trial. It’s in Minneapolis and the jury is not sequestered. No way these jurors are not fearful of what might come to their families with a not guilty verdict. It’s a disgrace what our country is these days. That defense attorney destroyed the medical examiner today and put an enormous amount of reasonable doubt on this case but it won’t matter.
Posted by Dday63
Member since Sep 2014
2393 posts
Posted on 4/10/21 at 6:58 am to
quote:

Hey commie, how much weight was on Floyd’s shoulder?



Enough.
Posted by TBoy
Kalamazoo
Member since Dec 2007
27358 posts
Posted on 4/10/21 at 7:05 am to
quote:

Welcome to Joe Biden's America.

This all went down during the Trump administration.
Posted by Dday63
Member since Sep 2014
2393 posts
Posted on 4/10/21 at 7:05 am to
quote:

Murder 3 in Minnesota is what is known as “depraved heart murder”, which I don’t see applying to this case at all.


I agree that is what it is intended to cover, but the language is broad enough that it could apply here. It is any act "eminently dangerous to others. And with a depraved mind." Depraved mind just means a lack of regard for human life. I think the jury could get there.

Plus, the Judge already tossed Murder 3 as inapplicable, but the appellate court reinstated the charge saying it could apply in this case. So, if the jury convicts on that charge I think it will hold up.
This post was edited on 4/10/21 at 7:16 am
Posted by tarzana
TX Hwy 6-- the Brazos River Valley
Member since Sep 2015
30545 posts
Posted on 4/10/21 at 8:26 am to
Wrong. And since it became (literally) painfully obvious that Floyd was impaired, Derek Chauvin had a moral obligation to modify his level of restraint.
This post was edited on 4/10/21 at 8:30 am
Posted by tarzana
TX Hwy 6-- the Brazos River Valley
Member since Sep 2015
30545 posts
Posted on 4/10/21 at 8:33 am to
quote:

"depraved heart murder"

Simply the depraved look on Chauvin's face during the cruel event seems sufficient to uphold that standard.
Posted by longwayfromLA
NYC
Member since Nov 2007
3331 posts
Posted on 4/12/21 at 8:01 am to
quote:

The paid ones or the real ones?


Well you generally don't get to be paid an expert pulmonologist unless you are a "real" pulmonologist. But if it makes you feel better, Tobin was paid for his testimony. I'm sure that changes everything for you.
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
154425 posts
Posted on 4/12/21 at 8:05 am to
GF had a moral obligation not to be a complete piece of shite criminal.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
135342 posts
Posted on 4/12/21 at 8:19 am to
quote:

Wrong. And since it became (literally) painfully obvious that Floyd was impaired, Derek Chauvin had a moral obligation to modify his level of restraint.
Regardless, Floyd was a dead man walking when he swallowed that load of fentanyl to avoid getting caught with it.
Posted by captainFid
Never apologize to barbarism
Member since Dec 2014
9077 posts
Posted on 4/12/21 at 8:27 am to
quote:

a healthy, sober person wouldn't have died from all that.


most healthy, sober persons know how to stay out of all that. Passing counterfeit twenties (which the media denied at one time) may have had something to do with it as well.
Posted by ChuckO1975
Member since Feb 2021
1292 posts
Posted on 4/12/21 at 8:29 am to
quote:

Well you generally don't get to be paid an expert pulmonologist unless you are a "real" pulmonologist. But if it makes you feel better, Tobin was paid for his testimony. I'm sure that changes everything for you.


Yeah, it does. Why would the prosecution pay a doctor to say he disagrees with their case?
Posted by Wolfhound45
Member since Nov 2009
125592 posts
Posted on 4/12/21 at 8:29 am to
quote:

Chauvin is going to jail for life, time to admit it
No he isn’t. He may be convicted (despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary) of a lesser charge, but he is not going to jail for life.
Posted by Bulldogblitz
In my house
Member since Dec 2018
28155 posts
Posted on 4/12/21 at 8:30 am to
quote:

Virtual impossible? Did you miss yesterday? The prosecution brought on pulmonologist spent a number of hours making that argument in detail. Perhaps your medical expertise takes you a different direction, but the argument was certainly made.


Was this the one that said because he was prone, he was certain to die?
Posted by BiteMe2020
Texas
Member since Nov 2020
7284 posts
Posted on 4/12/21 at 8:31 am to
quote:

Wrong. And since it became (literally) painfully obvious that Floyd was impaired, Derek Chauvin had a moral obligation to modify his level of restraint.


Impaired, but you need to prove Chauvin knew he was literally dying.

In fact, the prosecution needs to prove that the restraint WAS the cause of death BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT.

So far, any reasonable person has reasonable doubt. Which is, at least for now, the legal standard for convictions in criminal cases.
Posted by Turbeauxdog
Member since Aug 2004
24073 posts
Posted on 4/12/21 at 8:35 am to
quote:

In fact, the prosecution needs to prove that the restraint WAS the cause of death BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT.



I think the standard is significant factor.

The prosecution stumbled around this until Dr Woke declared laughably that a completely healthy man would have died.

We'll see what defense witnesses say.
Posted by LightMerchant
Member since Apr 2021
221 posts
Posted on 4/12/21 at 8:43 am to
Out of curiosity, isn’t the arresting officer responsible for the arrestee’s life once they are handcuffed and in custody?

If the person dies while in custody and the officer showed neglect for human life, that could be a crime, no?

You cannot expect Chauvin to know Floyd had a bad ticker. But we do expect Chauvin to be attentive to the person’s state and act accordingly. Not just carry on as if the person is not in medical distress, as they pass out while literally in your hands.

Possible that Chauvin’s knowledge that EMS had been notified absolves him of neglect.
Posted by SOSFAN
Blythewood
Member since Jun 2018
14946 posts
Posted on 4/12/21 at 8:49 am to
quote:

the person dies while in custody and the officer showed neglect for human life, that could be a crime, no?


Seeing as how Chauvin didn't show neglect your questions have no bearing on this case.

Floyd asked NUMEROUS times what he was on.

Floyd begged to be put on ground.

Floyd panicked and ate his pills.

Police called for medical help more than once.

So a better question is why aren't we pointing out the lack of personal accountability.
Posted by LightMerchant
Member since Apr 2021
221 posts
Posted on 4/12/21 at 9:00 am to
quote:

Seeing as how Chauvin didn't show neglect your questions have no bearing on this case.


That is an opinion, is it not?

Not saying it is wrong. But the jurors may be of different opinion. They could, COULD, find that the evidence supports a finding of neglect. More than one person has interpreted Chauvin’s demeanor / behavior as indifferent.

Don’t be surprised if he is convicted on manslaughter.

“Duty of Care”:

LINK
This post was edited on 4/12/21 at 9:04 am
Posted by Turbeauxdog
Member since Aug 2004
24073 posts
Posted on 4/12/21 at 9:01 am to
quote:

You cannot expect Chauvin to know Floyd had a bad ticker. But we do expect Chauvin to be attentive to the person’s state and act accordingly. Not just carry on as if the person is not in medical distress, as they pass out while literally in your hands.


It's fair but it's complicated by Floyd's repeated resisting of arrest at all times that he wasn't prone.
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram