- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
The Left's latest attempt to derail Trump's SCOTUS pick: Maybe it shouldn't be a woman
Posted on 9/23/20 at 11:18 pm
Posted on 9/23/20 at 11:18 pm
Poor NY Times. They have the sads.
NY Times via msn
quote:
The New York Times
Promises of a Woman for Ginsburg's Seat Draw Mixed Feelings From Women
In 1993, when Judge Ruth Bader Ginsburg was nominated to the Supreme Court, then-Senator Joseph R. Biden Jr. thanked her for saving his daughter “from having to be the second woman nominee to the Supreme Court.”
She was confirmed with overwhelming bipartisan support.
Twenty-seven years later, as Justice Ginsburg’s death roils the country and injects new uncertainty into an already bitter presidential race, one element is all-but certain: The country will soon have a fifth woman appointed to the Supreme Court.
Mr. Biden, now the Democratic candidate for president, has pledged to “make history” and appoint the first Black woman to the Court should he have the chance.
President Trump, who is expected to make an actual nomination this week, has made a similar promise. He, too, plans to name a woman — “a very talented, very brilliant woman.”
The proclamations from both men about how each would replace Justice Ginsburg, a pioneering force for gender equality on the court, have reflected conspicuous signaling by both parties as they rush to appeal to crucial constituencies ahead of the election. The pledges draw on a traditional political tactic: one way to seek to appeal to women is with women, as surrogates and in positions of power. But that approach has stirred complicated feelings in women across the country — and it may not be the most effective.
NY Times via msn
This post was edited on 9/23/20 at 11:20 pm
Posted on 9/23/20 at 11:20 pm to Frank Black
Agreed. Nominate the most qualified person. Now.
Posted on 9/23/20 at 11:20 pm to Frank Black
Joe Biden: it will be a woman.
NyTimes: this is revolutionary and forward thinking
Donald Trump: it will be a woman
NyTimes: this does not appeal to women and is probably sexist
NyTimes: this is revolutionary and forward thinking
Donald Trump: it will be a woman
NyTimes: this does not appeal to women and is probably sexist
Posted on 9/23/20 at 11:21 pm to Frank Black
So NYT have become anti-feminist?
Posted on 9/23/20 at 11:21 pm to Frank Black
quote:Well, they are less likely to rape and drunkenly carouse.
Maybe it shouldn't be a woman
Posted on 9/23/20 at 11:22 pm to Frank Black
Damned if you do, damned if you don’t.
Posted on 9/23/20 at 11:24 pm to Frank Black
It's because a woman nominee can't be Kavanaugh-ed by the fake news media. That's why they are upset.
Posted on 9/23/20 at 11:24 pm to jatilen
quote:Hello
It's because a woman nominee can't be Kavanaugh-ed by the fake news media. That's why they are upset.
Posted on 9/23/20 at 11:27 pm to jatilen
quote:
It's because a woman nominee can't be Kavanaugh-ed by the fake news media. That's why they are upset.
Of course this is it
They can see it coming. Having to trash women to oppose the pick.
It will be a solid look. But then again they gave up #MeToo real fast over there
Posted on 9/23/20 at 11:31 pm to jatilen
quote:
It's because a woman nominee can't be Kavanaugh-ed by the fake news media. That's why they are upset.
And the more any Democrat(s) simply indiscriminately and gratuitously hammer a woman in these publicly televised proceedings, without good cause, the easier they make it on Republican "swing vote" Senators to vote to confirm. As well as potentially putting some unforeseen pressure on a Democrat or two to consider breaking ranks.
Posted on 9/23/20 at 11:32 pm to navy
quote:
She was confirmed with overwhelming bipartisan support.
Said with absolutely no self-awareness.
It's almost like Republicans have to play by different rules you fricking asshats.
Posted on 9/23/20 at 11:33 pm to Frank Black
Well, I much prefer William Pryor.
Posted on 9/23/20 at 11:34 pm to Jake88
quote:You know that's not gonna happen, right?
Well, I much prefer William Pryor.
Posted on 9/23/20 at 11:35 pm to Frank Black
Of course. Not this time.
Posted on 9/23/20 at 11:36 pm to Frank Black
Would be nice if Trump could find a conservative gay trans Muslim to nominate just for the lols
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News