Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

The CFPB - A Democrat Organized Crime Syndicate

Posted on 11/29/17 at 5:05 pm
Posted by BeefDawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
4747 posts
Posted on 11/29/17 at 5:05 pm
This topic has been discussed a bit over the last few days here, but none of the information has been consolidated, and I don't really think most here understand the incredible significance of this issue. This may very well be a scandal for the ages, but the MSM may sweep it under the rug enough because of it's complexity and ultimately keep much of the public from knowing of it's existence, or at the very least spin it against Trump and the Republicans as an anti-Consumer Protection/pro-big bank/pro-1% narrative.

This is quintessential DC corruption at it's pinnacle. It doesn't get any bigger and bolder than this.


In a nutshell, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which was created in 2010 under the Dodd-Frank Act, by a super-majority Dem Congress and signed by Obama, and originally conceived and brought to fruition by Elizabeth (Pocahontas) Warren, has been outed finally for essentially being a pseudo organized crime syndicate 100% owned and controlled by nothing but Democrats. Complete with bully shake-downs, strong-arm extortion, and outright armed robbery via loaded law.

1. Democrats cleverly rigged the law, creating the Bureau so that it was allegedly an "independent financial regulatory body" free from partisanship and influence from politicians and outside lobbies/donors. They did this by setting their funding to come from the Fed Reserve and fines/penalties they institute in the course of their enforcement, rather than under Congressional budgetary jurisdiction. Also, the director of the Bureau couldn't be fired by the President or Congress without proof of gross malfeasance, which was impossible to attain since Congress had no oversight authority over the Bureau and no power of the purse. The law made them autonomous and virtually untouchable.

2. Obama did an illegal recess appointment for its director (Cordray) via Executive Order, and from there, nothing but Democrats were hired throughout the organization. A whistleblower, Ronald Rubin, has highlighted their corrupt and discriminatory hiring practices as well as bringing to light many more abuses and wrongdoings inside the Bureau. Rubin was an Enforcement Dept. attorney with the CFPB for its first 5 years, the 13th overall employee hired after its inception, as well as on the hiring committee during his tenure.

3. The CFPB did actually help a lot of "Consumers" with grievances against banks and corporations, catching a lot of legitimate fraud and corrupt practices. Thousands of lawsuits and billions in fines and penalties were paid... HOWEVER, only a small portion of those penalty monies actually made their way back to the Consumers who were grieved.

4. The CFPB "targeted" businesses with the most revenue and profits rather than the ones with the most complaints and contemptible practices, and then maximized their fines based on what the business could afford to pay rather than what was actually warranted as a penalty. And they did this many times without even doing an investigation, filing suit, or even supplying evidence. They simply coerced companies into behind the scenes non-public settlements with the threat of investigations and lawsuits. Forcing many companies to decide between paying millions in legal fees to fight the allegations, potentially taking huge PR hits and destroying reputations and brand names, causing investors to bail and flee, or simply settling for millions in secret with the caveat of keeping the entire episode quiet. THIS was textbook organized criminal extortion.

5. The CFPB then paid out hundreds of millions (possibly billions) from these penalty monies in contracts to Democrat lobbies, PR firms, and PAC's. Often paying known Democrat advertising consultants/firms tens of millions to create advertising campaigns to propagate grand stories of the CFPB "protecting the consumer from big bad capitalism". In addition to many times stonewalling audits and attempted oversight by Congress. Much of the money from fines and penalties has yet to be physically accounted for.

Just to give an example of this, Wells Fargo was caught conducting an improper employee incentive program that paid employees for every account they opened. But employees were found to be fraudulently opening hundreds of thousands of accounts under client names that didn't actually open accounts. So CFPB fined WF $185 million. Only $5 million of this went back to Consumers in restitution, and a large portion of the $180 million remaining can't be accounted for and has essentially been dived out in random slush funds or simply disappeared into the ether.

6. Cordray just resigned as director last week. Trump just appointed Mulvaney as director. Trump and Republicans will soon conduct an investigation and audit. Everyone currently under Mulvaney, however, is a Democrat, something like 600 employees, which is a major problem. Heads in the department are about to roll, but Democrats have filed lawsuits trying to stave off this impending scandal. It's suspected that these penalty monies were used as illegal slush funds by numerous Democrats associated with the Bureau, Cordray, and upper level Bureau management. And, that businesses who were considered "Rightwing" or vocally opposed to the CFPB's tactics were specifically targeted.

7. Trump and Reps plan to rewrite the laws for the CFPB, keeping the Bureau and it's intended purpose in place, but making it so it can't be abused, meaning it will be funded properly through Congressional budget jurisdiction, require regular audits, and be under full oversight from Congress. Mulvaney has a lot of work to do. Basically will have to fire damn near everyone and spend quite a bit of time re-stocking the place back up with qualified non-partisan employees. While simultaneously conducting audits and investigations of existing people, who for the time being, control all the access to the documents and files needed for said audits and investigations. Which is quite the conundrum.



These are long reads, but if you want the full picture of how extensive and corrupt this thing was, you should read them all. This is some insane shite.



March 2016: The CFPB Is a Great Example of Why People Feel Powerless.

October 2016: The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is ruled unconstitutional.

November 2016: 100 percent of Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's donations went to Democrats.

December 2016: Conceived as a government watchdog with noble aims, the CFPB was doomed by a structure that made it an inherently political agency.

February 2017: Warren will stop at nothing to shield the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau from scrutiny. After all, it’s her signature accomplishment, and she has a political future to think about.

June 2017: Congress needs to examine the CFPB more than the CFPB needs to examine businesses.

November 2017: The CFPB’s first director cared about consumers, but he was consumed by politics.
Posted by bamarep
Member since Nov 2013
51794 posts
Posted on 11/29/17 at 5:07 pm to
Thanks for the research on this baw.

I’ve been reading up on these boys.

Holy shite at the power these idiots had.
Posted by CAD703X
Liberty Island
Member since Jul 2008
77940 posts
Posted on 11/29/17 at 5:09 pm to
quote:

Thanks for the research on this baw.

I’ve been reading up on these boys.

Holy shite at the power these idiots had.


shine a bright light and watch the cockroaches run
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
118636 posts
Posted on 11/29/17 at 5:12 pm to
Nice write up.
Posted by Brosef Stalin
Member since Dec 2011
39161 posts
Posted on 11/29/17 at 5:14 pm to
Any chance Congress can just dissolve this agency? Trump's new guy in charge doesn't even like it.
Posted by bamarep
Member since Nov 2013
51794 posts
Posted on 11/29/17 at 5:16 pm to
Mick is a numbers/budget/rules geek.

He don’t like it because the agency he just was charged with whipping into shape had oversight by NO ONE.
Posted by MMauler
Member since Jun 2013
19216 posts
Posted on 11/29/17 at 5:30 pm to
quote:

In addition to many times stonewalling audits and attempted oversight by Congress. Much of the money from fines and penalties has yet to be physically accounted for.


THIS is why Fauxcahontus went bat-shite crazy when Trump appointed Mulvaney. Some of the money went to typical left-wing DNC operative groups like the Urban League - much of it kicked back to Dems and the DNC. It's been rumored that the Rev-uh-runds Al and Jesse's groups got large "honorariums" to kick back. But, perhaps one of the biggest rumors has this SCAM giving Planned Parenthood MILLIONS -- all unaccounted for.

Well, NOW we'll finally get an audit - A REAL AUDIT and we'll see how they illegal used this DNC slushfund.
Posted by BamaCoaster
God's Gulf
Member since Apr 2016
5253 posts
Posted on 11/29/17 at 5:36 pm to
quote:

BeefDawg


Posts like this will keep me reading this board daily despite the barrage of elementary bullshite that has taken over this board.
Posted by Oddibe
Close to some, further from others
Member since Sep 2015
6565 posts
Posted on 11/29/17 at 5:37 pm to
Drain the swamp!!
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
94820 posts
Posted on 11/29/17 at 5:40 pm to
Any chance of Chief Sitting bullshite getting indicted?
Posted by BeefDawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
4747 posts
Posted on 11/29/17 at 9:09 pm to
quote:

Any chance Congress can just dissolve this agency? Trump's new guy in charge doesn't even like it.

It's actually a very worthy and needed concept.

There is no question that some financial institutions and businesses take advantage of Consumers and mistreat them. Consumers really do need a protection bureau that will aggregate complaints, investigate potential misconduct, and punish offenders for Consumer mistreatment.

The problem is the organization who's job this is needs to not be some bloated slush fund golden goose overflowing with corruption and abuse because our elected Legislature's wrote a deceptive law enabling it so.
Posted by bhtigerfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
29407 posts
Posted on 11/29/17 at 9:22 pm to
If we don't see that smug sonofabitch Cordray in a courtroom as a defendant this year, we should string up every fricking politician in Washington from the cherry trees.
Posted by FrenchToast
The French Kitchen
Member since Jan 2016
1810 posts
Posted on 11/30/17 at 1:54 am to
Fantastic write up. Thanks for posting!
Posted by starsandstripes
Georgia
Member since Nov 2017
11897 posts
Posted on 11/30/17 at 2:17 am to
quote:

Just to give an example of this, Wells Fargo was caught conducting an improper employee incentive program that paid employees for every account they opened. But employees were found to be fraudulently opening hundreds of thousands of accounts under client names that didn't actually open accounts. So CFPB fined WF $185 million. Only $5 million of this went back to Consumers in restitution, and a large portion of the $180 million remaining can't be accounted for and has essentially been dived out in random slush funds or simply disappeared into the ether.


A forensic accountant can figure out where this money went. They hid it from regular auditing, thinking their grip on power would never be broken, but an expert can figure it out. I suspect that is part of the plan for Trump's assignment of Mulvaney.

Right now the Dems are complaining about Mulvaney. If they begin complaining about another person connected to this agency / office, it'll be important to see what the person's background is and what roles and responsibilities they are given. If that person(s) is a forensic accountant or a comparable skillset, then we'll know the dominos are about to fall.
Posted by Wolfhound45
Hanging with Chicken in Lurkistan
Member since Nov 2009
120000 posts
Posted on 11/30/17 at 4:31 am to
Well done

Keep this thread going. I want it to lead right back to the political gangsters who ran this scheme.
Posted by starsandstripes
Georgia
Member since Nov 2017
11897 posts
Posted on 11/30/17 at 4:58 am to
quote:

It's actually a very worthy and needed concept.


Which is why the DOJ and FBI have an enormous amount of resources devoted to looking at white collar crime, fraud, anti-trust, etc. In the past it's been said that the #1 educational background the FBI sought was accounting.

CFPB wasn't needed.

Shite's about to get real over there.
Posted by BeefDawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
4747 posts
Posted on 11/30/17 at 8:46 am to
quote:

Which is why the DOJ and FBI have an enormous amount of resources devoted to looking at white collar crime, fraud, anti-trust, etc. In the past it's been said that the #1 educational background the FBI sought was accounting.

CFPB wasn't needed.

The problem is the DOJ and FBI don’t have the capacity to handle and aggregate tens of thousands of Consumer complaints every year and categorize issues by a dozen degrees of severity and then impose non-adjudicated varying degrees of penalty.

That’s not what those agencies are designed for. So either we could expand those agencies and create a “Consumer Protection Department” in the DOJ or FBI, or we can simply restructure the already existing CFPB, which already has a technology platform for the public to submit complaints and an operations ruleset and infrastructure already in place.

The CFPB just needs an overhaul of management and staff, and some tweaks to the law that dictate its funding and oversight.

If properly run, the Bureau may actually be self-sustaining and cost the tax payers nothing. Especially with no thieving Democrats there to steal tens of millions in penalty monies.

In actuality, this Bureau probably only needs half the management and staff to viably run the thing at peak efficiency when everyone there is honest instead of corrupt.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram