Started By
Message
locked post

States rights or slavery.

Posted on 11/23/18 at 7:07 am
Posted by bencoleman
RIP 7/19
Member since Feb 2009
37887 posts
Posted on 11/23/18 at 7:07 am
LINK

For those that have participated in the perpetual argument. I hope that this video gives some of you closure on this subject. Also where would we all be today had the south rightfully won.
Posted by TigerBalsagna
tRedStick
Member since Jan 2015
726 posts
Posted on 11/23/18 at 7:08 am to
Id probably be in Korea,or perhaps New Zealand.
Posted by Henry Jones Jr
Member since Jun 2011
68415 posts
Posted on 11/23/18 at 7:14 am to
Slavery was a state right. So yeah state rights was technically the reason. Slavery being the main one
Posted by Skeezer
Member since Apr 2017
2296 posts
Posted on 11/23/18 at 7:26 am to
Slavery ended peacefully every where else on earth. It was going to end in America. We didn’t need to wipe out 2/3 of our economy, have 600,000 casualties, and destroy the nation.
Compensation, capitalism, innovation, and the north nullification of the fugitive slave act would have ended slavery eventually.
And it would have been better for black people if it happen that way instead of the horrific policy of reconstruction. Hayes finally realized this and ended reconstruction during his term.
And the negative effects of it have damaged black people ever since. It was a major factor in the income tax being passed. Southern politician and southerners in general saw it as a punishment for the more industrial north and as a payback for reconstruction.
Posted by mahdragonz
Member since Jun 2013
6926 posts
Posted on 11/23/18 at 8:05 am to
The articles of secession didn't allow states to opt out of slavery if they wanted to.

Also, the confederate States of America stated that northern States were required to return slaves if they escaped even if slavery didn't exist in that state.

Funny how those states rights were worthless.

Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
64876 posts
Posted on 11/23/18 at 8:08 am to
The South believed in the right of the states to own slaves. Whether you like it or not, the Deep South states (the ones that went first) seceded from the Union because they felt slavery was in danger of being abolished or, at the very least, significantly degraded. Their own words bear this out.
Posted by bencoleman
RIP 7/19
Member since Feb 2009
37887 posts
Posted on 11/23/18 at 8:16 am to
quote:

The South believed in the right of the states to own slaves. Whether you like it or not, the Deep South states (the ones that went first) seceded from the Union because they felt slavery was in danger of being abolished or, at the very least, significantly degraded. Their own words bear this out



So the old gentleman in the video is a liar. I would say that if you called him such in his day you would've had to back up your words with action. Something that is sorely lacking in our society.
Posted by TenWheelsForJesus
Member since Jan 2018
6428 posts
Posted on 11/23/18 at 8:17 am to
quote:

Also where would we all be today had the south rightfully won.


We would be better off without the federal leviathan we do now.
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
21855 posts
Posted on 11/23/18 at 8:23 am to
quote:

Slavery ended peacefully every where else on earth. It was going to end in America. We didn’t need to wipe out 2/3 of our economy, have 600,000 casualties, and destroy the nation.


It's a pity the South had to turn treasonous in order to not end it peacefully.

Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
64876 posts
Posted on 11/23/18 at 8:23 am to
quote:

So the old gentleman in the video is a liar.


The old gentleman in the video was born in 1846. He was only 14 years old when the South began to secede from the Union, and thus would have barely been attuned to the sectional crisis in the years leading up to secession as he would have been too young to understand or probably even care.

A liar? No. Misinformed? Yes. The words of the men who actually pushed for secession in those early days speak plainly enough. When you read the Articles of Secession from the various states, and when you listen to speeches made by politicians such as Alexander Stephens (the Vice-President of the CSA), it becomes clear that the desire to protect slavery was THE primary factor for secession as well as the formation of the Confederate government.
This post was edited on 11/23/18 at 8:24 am
Posted by bencoleman
RIP 7/19
Member since Feb 2009
37887 posts
Posted on 11/23/18 at 8:26 am to
quote:

We would be better off without the federal leviathan we do now



This right here. The wrong side won the war.
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
64876 posts
Posted on 11/23/18 at 8:30 am to
quote:

The wrong side won the war.


If the Confederacy had won the war, North America would literally be made up of dozens of independent countries right now. Instead of one solid, continuous country, the map would look more like Europe.
Posted by TheHarahanian
Actually not Harahan as of 6/2023
Member since May 2017
19484 posts
Posted on 11/23/18 at 8:33 am to
quote:

federal leviathan


This was clearly not the intent of the founders of the country.
Posted by bencoleman
RIP 7/19
Member since Feb 2009
37887 posts
Posted on 11/23/18 at 8:39 am to
quote:

the Confederacy had won the war, North America would literally be made up of dozens of independent countries right now. Instead of one solid, continuous country, the map would look more like Europe


You don't know this. I like to think that the sides could've come together to form a new country stronger than ever but not what we have today. What we have today is an abomination. And it still may split up into several countries due to the massive chasm that exists between left and right.
Posted by ItTakesAThief
Scottsdale, Arizona
Member since Dec 2009
9187 posts
Posted on 11/23/18 at 8:51 am to
Slavery was on the way out with industrialization and the cotton gin. As an institution it’s days were numbered.

The wealthy planters wanted to sell the raw cotton to the Ruropeans who were paying higher prices. The north was going through and industrial revolution and wanted the south’s raw materials but weren’t willing to outbid the europeans and thought the south was obligated to sell to them.

If the south did not the north hurt financially and the industrialists lost money. This one of the political bargaining chips was slavery to control this financial disputes. But the real dispute was about economics.
Posted by arcalades
USA
Member since Feb 2014
19276 posts
Posted on 11/23/18 at 8:54 am to
The South/Stonewall was going to burn dc to the ground. There would have been no coming back from that.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
67456 posts
Posted on 11/23/18 at 8:55 am to
the south was wrong about slavery


Lincoln was wrong about ignoring the Constitution


no one had clean hands
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
64876 posts
Posted on 11/23/18 at 8:59 am to
quote:

You don't know this. I like to think that the sides could've come together to form a new country stronger than ever but not what we have today.


You're a dreamer and my alternate history scenario is more realistic than yours.

The Confederacy was too weak to function properly and would have had to eventually re-invent itself with a stronger central government. Essentially becoming the same thing they had seceded from, independent-minded states such as Texas would have said adios and gone off to do their own thing.

By allowing secession to triumph, the floodgates would have been thrown wide open. States that came to hate unpopular policies levied by the central government could just secede and do their own thing. Because who best to govern Indiana or Kentucky? Men and women who have never set foot in the state or Indianans and Kentuckians?
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
64876 posts
Posted on 11/23/18 at 9:02 am to
quote:

Slavery was on the way out with industrialization and the cotton gin.


This right here proves to me that you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. Slavery was a dying institution toward the end of the 18th century when the invention of the cotton gin reinvigorated it and made it bigger than it ever had been.

ETA: And the fact I'm being down voted for stating fact shows me how uneducated people on this board are when it comes to this subject.
This post was edited on 11/23/18 at 9:32 am
Posted by Rex
Here, there, and nowhere
Member since Sep 2004
66001 posts
Posted on 11/23/18 at 9:07 am to
quote:

Slavery ended peacefully every where else on earth. It was going to end in America.

Well, maybe, but certainly already TOO LATE.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram