Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

So potential criminal extortion of a foreign govt SHOULD NOT be investigated?

Posted on 11/12/19 at 11:31 am
Posted by Covingtontiger77
Member since Dec 2015
10188 posts
Posted on 11/12/19 at 11:31 am
Essentially that is the position of the left with regard to MAGA asking for some assistance in investigating suspicions that had to do with the former 2nd highest administration member and a foreign govt.


Let’s say MAGA did ask the Ukraines to do this with Biden and son, so freaking what? It’s not like the Ukraines were going to ask that Biden and son be expedited there to face trial. What would happen is that the Ukraines would turn over what they found and the DOJ would then review, corroborate the info, then see if there were in fact violations of US criminal or tax law.

I really see nothing wrong with this.

You don’t to have trouble with the govt- DONT BREAK THE LAW ASSHOLES



Interesting times we live in.
This post was edited on 11/12/19 at 11:33 am
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
56356 posts
Posted on 11/12/19 at 11:36 am to
criminal extorion BY A PREVIOUS ADMINISTRATION

Of course it's within his duty to uncover and expose this. Biden is defined much more as a former vice president than he is as a candidate for the democratic nomination.

His actions as VP are much more important and he doesn't get cover because he decided to run for president.
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
59537 posts
Posted on 11/12/19 at 11:38 am to
It's not corruption when the Democrats do it, duh.
Posted by Covingtontiger77
Member since Dec 2015
10188 posts
Posted on 11/12/19 at 11:38 am to
quote:

His actions as VP are much more important and he doesn't get cover because he decided to run for president.



Apparently not- because the shite left wants to impeach a president for possibly doing just that. And I might add, that he actually never really did anything except possibly bring up the possibility of an investigating what went on with Biden and son.
Posted by mindbreaker
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2011
7632 posts
Posted on 11/12/19 at 11:41 am to
yes when there was no evidence of it at all. Just speculation based on nothing but he's my strongest opponent in 2020 so it'd be cool if we found something on him. But keep moving the goalposts for corrupt-in-cheif Trump. Sure it will work out for you splendidly.
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
59537 posts
Posted on 11/12/19 at 11:44 am to
quote:

yes when there was no evidence of it at all.


Now I have to believe you're just fricking with people. You do realize that there's footage of Biden saying that they weren't getting the money unless the prosecutor was fired, right? It's not even Up For Debate, not a little, a lot. This is fact.
This post was edited on 11/12/19 at 11:45 am
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
73415 posts
Posted on 11/12/19 at 11:45 am to
quote:

Just speculation based on nothing but he's my strongest opponent in 2020 so it'd be cool if we found something on him.
Posted by EZE Tiger Fan
Member since Jul 2004
50234 posts
Posted on 11/12/19 at 11:46 am to
quote:

yes when there was no evidence of it at all. Just


My goodness you Filth are the worst. You will literally defend anything.

No evidence, except, of course, Joe Biden's dumbass admitting it, and his son getting millions....and admitting it.

Other than that, nothing.

You are the type of idiot the media counts on daily.
Posted by Oddibe
Close to some, further from others
Member since Sep 2015
6565 posts
Posted on 11/12/19 at 11:47 am to
quote:

yes when there was no evidence of it at all.
That video of Joe admitting to extorting the Ukrainian government is the only evidence we have.
Posted by PhDoogan
Member since Sep 2018
14947 posts
Posted on 11/12/19 at 11:49 am to
It has been reported that Burisma gave Hunter Biden and the Kerry son-in-law their lucrative board position to gain access to the State Department and/or the White House. Literally pay-to-play and much more akin to bribery, a specified and defined impeachable offense, than anything Trump is accused of.

Joe later expressly conditioned the release of $1 BILLION in US aid on to fire the prosecutor who was gunning after Burisma and wanted to interview Hunter. The conditioning of the aid would have been appropriate had it not been for the conflict and what appears with the corrupt intent to, not only prevent Hunter's interview, but also to keep the gravy train rolling.

But impeach the current president for even daring to question that arrangement.
Posted by Dead End
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2013
21237 posts
Posted on 11/12/19 at 11:50 am to
It's not potential extortion when Biden is on video bragging about it.
Posted by wheelr
Member since Jul 2012
5147 posts
Posted on 11/12/19 at 11:53 am to
quote:

My goodness you Filth are the worst. You will literally defend anything.

No evidence, except, of course, Joe Biden's dumbass admitting it, and his son getting millions....and admitting it.


Not to mention, an investigation is done to collect evidence.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram