re: Sidney Powell: It's Still Happening!

quote:

---

You pointed to a Nevada case. Everyone knows that PA, MI, WI, GA, and AZ are higher on the food chain

---

Multiple dudes asked for just 1 example pretending it didn't exist. They got an example(there are more than 1).

Now people are crawfishing instead of admitting they were wrong.

LINK


Here is yet another judge stating was expecting Trump's lawsuit to present evidence, but they did not, so...

quote:

---

Brann, in his ruling, said he expected the campaign to present formidable evidence of rampant corruption as it sought to nullify millions of votes. Instead, he said, the campaign presented “strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations.”

---

quote:

---

you could show that the internet connections cited in the report are wrong. that they never happened. have you done that?

---

I think we know the systems were connected to the internet.

There has been no evidence presented that I'm aware of that shows that specific connections were made to these systems and that data was manipulated.

The former doesn't prove that the latter occurred. You seem to be making a huge leap.

quote:

---

you're all hung up on this when there are other, more immediate concerns, namely, the connections cited in the report

---

It's important because Sidney said it. It being inaccurate affects her credibility. That's been my point all along.

quote:

---

yeah the conspirators are going to out themselves

---

Sidney said "our forces" confiscated the servers.

quote:

---

“The servers at Scytl in Germany were confiscated the other day,” Powell told Beck during a 15-minute conversation related to voter fraud claims made by President Trump. “I’m hearing it was our forces that got those servers, so I think the government is now working on an investigation of what really happened.”

---

Are you suggesting that those that confiscated the servers are the conspirators?

quote:

---

said no reasonable person ever. it's called a cover up. the effort to discredit powell without ANY factual, contrary data whatsoever should be a clue to you

---

I believe there is a cover up of the fraud. That doesn't mean that every accusation holds merit.

quote:

---

of course you don't. yet you've been going on and on about how you know this and you know that

---

You mentioned a "cyber report" but just linked the court filings.

Are you simply pointing to the supposed evidence that these systems were connected to the Internet? Or, are you saying there is another report that show that active connections were made and votes were changed. If it's the latter, can you be more specific to what you are referring?

quote:

---

Now people are crawfishing instead of admitting they were wrong

---

i responded clearly. yes, the title says what you said. the content absolutely does not. it's not my fault you aren't sophisticated enough to pick up on that.

did the judge/defense REFUTE the actual data? yes or no

or did he just dismiss because he didn't like how it was presented? if you're honest, then you know the case wasn't dismissed because of a lack of evidence. the evidence was there, it was presented. the judge that how the data was acquired and presented constituted no evidence, which is farcical

quote:

---

the campaign presented “strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations.”

---

which is a subjective evaluation of the evidence presented, not a lack of evidence, right?

and btw, you were asked for a case. you presented ONE case that was questionable. how about the other 60+?

quote:

---

very false informatio

---

Do we know for certain it’s false?

quote:

---

There has been no evidence presented that I'm aware of that shows that specific connections were made to these systems

---

i cited 4 cases for you. i don't know why you are saying this. nothing in that report has been refuted except with a handwave from krebs and the cisa

quote:

---

The former doesn't prove that the latter occurred

---

absolutely it does. without question.

quote:

---

It's important because Sidney said it. It being inaccurate affects her credibility. That's been my point all along

---

that kind of cloak and dagger stuff, we might NEVER know the truth. what we do know as of now is that there is publicly available cyberdata showing machines online with foreign address being connected to by other machines with foreign addresses. that is the immediate concern and that is something people actually have the power to do something about

quote:

---

Sidney said "our forces" confiscated the servers

---

again, whoever those people are might never see the light of day as far as testimony/affirmation goes. that might be classified until you're long dead. you're barking up the wrong tree

quote:

---

That doesn't mean that every accusation holds merit

---

nor does it mean that you should just blithely treat powell like she's some untrustworthy source of info who is in it for the money/book deal, right?

quote:

---

You mentioned a "cyber report" but just linked the court filings

---

the court filings mention the report. the report is online for you to read. i cited the decisions because you and others have been acting like powell's been holding out all this time and therefore is untrustworthy.

quote:

---

Are you simply pointing to the supposed evidence that these systems were connected to the Internet? Or, are you saying there is another report that show that active connections were made and votes were changed. If it's the latter, can you be more specific to what you are referring?

---

you are making this harder than it is. it's obvious you don't know all the details on this matter, you've made an uninformed opinion about powell and you've lectured me about not keeping up. now you're asking me to do the legwork to get you up to speed.

quote:

---

Do we know for certain it’s false?

---

I guess the answer is no. But, that's what I'm hoping Powell would do. She made a lot of accusations since the election. Some of those accusations seem highly unlikely (at minimum) to be true. She should set the record straight on anything that she has learned isn't true.

Until she's willing to do that, I simply don't give her comments that "undeniable proof is coming" an ounce of credibility.

quote:

---

evidence of rampant corruption

---

This is nice. He did not say none or some just Rampant.

quote:

---

since i know you are going to just do more whining and playing games, i'll bring the report to you along with every other thing i've brought to you so you can be informed and stop saying stupid stuff and wasting everyone's time defending an uninformed position

cyberdata report showing connections

---

reading now

quote:

---

republican appointed judges who scolded the Trump lawsuits for lack of evidence

---

quote:

---

Please provide just one link for this claim please

---

Third Circuit (Scolding - Judge Bibas, Trump appointee)

quote:

---

Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy. Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here.
. . .
The Campaign tries to repackage these state-law claims as unconstitutional discrimination. Yet its allegations are vague and conclusory.
. . .
Nor does the Campaign deserve an injunction to undo Pennsylvania’s certification of its votes. The Campaign’s claims have no merit.
. . .

---

quote:

---

Some of those accusations seem highly unlikely (at minimum) to be true

---

it's not lost on me that you have changed your position on this matter. you went from known false to unlikely. good for you. step in the right direction