- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Should Trump pack the supreme court?
Posted on 11/7/18 at 6:57 am
Posted on 11/7/18 at 6:57 am
Progressives keep mentioning that their plan might be to pack the court once they are back in power. Since they're now acknowledging this is a legitimate political tactic, why should we wait? Why don’t we add another three or four conservative justices to the Supreme Court right now? We have the progressive stamp of approval to do so.
If the resident progressive can weigh in on this, I’d appreciate it.
If the resident progressive can weigh in on this, I’d appreciate it.
This post was edited on 11/7/18 at 7:00 am
15
Posted on 11/7/18 at 6:59 am to cokebottleag
It’s already happening and will continue to happen the next two years.
Posted on 11/7/18 at 7:01 am to cokebottleag
No. We do things the right way. We just don't take any shite anymore.
Posted on 11/7/18 at 7:01 am to RockyMtnTigerWDE
6 more years
Posted on 11/7/18 at 7:01 am to RockyMtnTigerWDE
quote:
It’s already happening and will continue to happen the next two years.
No it hasn't.
In order to meet the definition of "court packing" you must add seats in order to flip the makeup of the court.
Posted on 11/7/18 at 7:02 am to SmackoverHawg
As progressives have pointed out, there’s nothing in the constitution that says we can’t do it.
Posted on 11/7/18 at 7:04 am to cokebottleag
A coach doesn't play his second string in hopes of winning a competitive ball game. He makes the decision who is his first string. It's the major benefit of being the head coach.
Posted on 11/7/18 at 7:08 am to cokebottleag
No, of course not.
And how would he do it without the House?
And how would he do it without the House?
Posted on 11/7/18 at 7:10 am to cokebottleag
Thank you for using the correct term. I wanted to pull out all my hair last week, reading the threads about “Court STACKING.”
No. GOP won the Senate, and court packing stinks of something a loser would do.
No. GOP won the Senate, and court packing stinks of something a loser would do.
Posted on 11/7/18 at 7:20 am to cokebottleag
Yes.
Posted on 11/7/18 at 7:41 am to cokebottleag
No
Posted on 11/7/18 at 7:42 am to Antonio Moss
quote:
And how would he do it without the House?
what he needs to do is propose expanding the court to get the house on record
Posted on 11/7/18 at 8:19 am to cokebottleag
Justice Thomas has mentioned he wants to retire while he can enjoy doing so.
Justice Thomas needs to (quietly) notify President Trump that he's retiring effective at the end of this term, so that President Trump can get the next candidate ready sooner rather than later.
Then when Justice Thomas makes the public announcement, President Trump should not wait too long before making his announcement as to the replacement.
Justice Thomas needs to (quietly) notify President Trump that he's retiring effective at the end of this term, so that President Trump can get the next candidate ready sooner rather than later.
Then when Justice Thomas makes the public announcement, President Trump should not wait too long before making his announcement as to the replacement.
Posted on 11/7/18 at 8:25 am to cokebottleag
quote:
hould Trump pack the supreme court?
Yes......he should put a contract out on the 2 lib chicks on the court and replace them with constitutionalists.
Posted on 11/7/18 at 8:26 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
what he needs to do is propose expanding the court to get the house on record
That's actually exactly what my intent was for the board libs here.
Posted on 11/7/18 at 8:28 am to cokebottleag
No. We would destroy the system of checks and balances. Simply putting people on the Court who will rule your way and not look at everything objectively is not the way to do things and undermines the purpose of the Court.
Posted on 11/7/18 at 8:34 am to Wtodd
So, we’re just counting the Notorious RBG and the Wise Latina, not Kevin Spacey?
Posted on 11/7/18 at 8:38 am to cokebottleag
Absolutely
Posted on 11/7/18 at 8:41 am to cokebottleag
Trump needs to pay someone to take US Justice Gins- nothing- burger on a overnite shopping spree in Cruz’ s district without her SS agents and have someone discover a pillow over her head the morning of the scheduled shopping spree.......
Posted on 11/7/18 at 8:44 am to cokebottleag
They’re far from getting the 2/3 Senate majority required for that kind of shenanigan.
Page 1 of 2
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News