Started By
Message
locked post

Should Americans be able to allocate how their taxes are spent?

Posted on 7/3/18 at 8:08 pm
Posted by Parmen
Member since Apr 2016
18317 posts
Posted on 7/3/18 at 8:08 pm
Hypothetically, I think we should be able to dedicate however much we are taxed towards programs we support. For example, instead of using any funds to subsidize welfare for lazy bums, I wish I could dedicate 100% of the taxes generated by my household for the Trump Wall.

Give us, as individuals, the chance to opt out funding crap we don't care about, like African food aid, free college programs, Planned Parenthood, etc.
Posted by djcaz33
Mandeville
Member since Dec 2007
616 posts
Posted on 7/3/18 at 8:11 pm to
I could 100% go along with this.
Posted by TheHarahanian
Actually not Harahan as of 6/2023
Member since May 2017
19490 posts
Posted on 7/3/18 at 8:13 pm to
If marxism is made voluntary, that will be the end of marxism.

So yeah, make it voluntary.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
108098 posts
Posted on 7/3/18 at 8:13 pm to
No, because at leas 70% of mine would go to NASA and none to entitlement spending.
Posted by wryder1
Birmingham
Member since Feb 2008
4152 posts
Posted on 7/3/18 at 8:20 pm to
(no message)
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
162190 posts
Posted on 7/3/18 at 8:23 pm to
Awful idea if you're talking about all of your taxes

If you wanted to have control over a smaller portion it might make some sense

We'd wind up with excesses in areas where we don't need it and short falls in areas where funding is needed
Posted by Canada_Baw
Member since Dec 2017
2044 posts
Posted on 7/3/18 at 8:33 pm to
Isn’t this basically the right to vote?
I mean - I’m not sure where in the constitution it allows the Government to tax everyone for bullshite - still run a defecit - and that get re-elected for 47 years until ol reaper comes knocking?
Posted by rintintin
Life is Life
Member since Nov 2008
16153 posts
Posted on 7/3/18 at 8:40 pm to
It sounds like a nice idea on it's face, but this would definitely happen:

quote:

We'd wind up with excesses in areas where we don't need it and short falls in areas where funding is needed


Some form of it would be nice though. Maybe a tier system, with provisions that certain things don't get over funded.
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
70775 posts
Posted on 7/3/18 at 8:41 pm to
I like it in principle.

Not sure how it would work on practice. Would you be limited to defunding entire departments or could you drill down to line items?

Posted by 0
Member since Aug 2011
16622 posts
Posted on 7/3/18 at 8:49 pm to
quote:

I wish I could dedicate 100% of the taxes generated by my household for the Trump Wall.


You wouldn’t spend any on education? Color me shocked.
Posted by ElectricWizard0
Member since Jul 2017
2702 posts
Posted on 7/3/18 at 9:36 pm to
quote:

We'd wind up with excesses in areas where we don't need it and short falls in areas where funding is needed


Isn’t this what we have already
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
64124 posts
Posted on 7/3/18 at 9:39 pm to
quote:

Should Americans be able to allocate how their taxes are spent?Posted on 7/3/18 at 8:08 pm 132 Hypothetically, I think we should


Not going to lie I'm going with the Founders on this one. Not Parmen

Posted by Arbengal
Louisiana
Member since Sep 2008
3003 posts
Posted on 7/3/18 at 9:40 pm to
Respectfully Hell No!! This is an asinine argument. Although I will completely agree that no one is qualified to make these decisions in the time we live in. No good stewards left I’m afraid. Sad
Posted by beulahland
Little D'arbonne
Member since Jan 2013
3565 posts
Posted on 7/3/18 at 10:19 pm to
Federal taxes, help yeah!
State and local, naw.
Posted by troyt37
Member since Mar 2008
13310 posts
Posted on 7/3/18 at 11:22 pm to
If we actually returned to the Constitution, and strictly applied it to all three branches of government, there would be no need.

Imagine a world where congress limits itself, or is checked by the executive or judiciary branch, because the Constitution does not grant them power over healthcare for example. Imagine the Supreme Court limiting itself to Constitutional bounds, refusing to hear cases the Constitution does not grant them dominion over. Imagine a federal government with 75-85 percent fewer agencies, and the resulting destruction of the bureaucracies, laws, regulations, and edicts that those bureaucracies have created in the last 150 years or so.

All our answers are in the Constitution. It is one of the greatest documents ever put to paper by mankind. Independence Day would be a great time to actually read it, soak in it’s unparalleled brilliance, and ponder the implications of returning it to it’s rightful place as the law of the land.
This post was edited on 7/3/18 at 11:23 pm
Posted by LaBornNRaised
Loomis blows
Member since Feb 2011
11004 posts
Posted on 7/4/18 at 2:57 am to
quote:

You wouldn’t spend any on education? Color me shocked


No, I’m already spending 15 grand a year to send my kids to private school.
Posted by heartbreakTiger
grinding for my grinders
Member since Jan 2008
138974 posts
Posted on 7/4/18 at 6:08 am to
Which then brings the question is it needed?

It would be interesting to see where the people want money spent vs the waste of the gov
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 7/4/18 at 6:13 am to
0 is what the federal government should be spending on education
Posted by Boatshoes
Member since Dec 2017
6775 posts
Posted on 7/4/18 at 7:26 am to
I am going to have to think about this. It is more of a direct democracy model than a respresentative republic model. Also, keep in mind that as divided as we are, that for every one of us that would fund the wall, there is a lefty that will defund ICE and send it all to the Department of Education and Refugee Resettlement.

So I am going to say no. Bad idea.
This post was edited on 7/4/18 at 7:27 am
Posted by tjv305
Member since May 2015
12504 posts
Posted on 7/4/18 at 7:37 am to
I think a percentage should go to things that we have to pay like military and politicians pay. But we should be able to spend atleast half of it .

It would be a good way to find out what the tax payers really want . Democrats would never go for this because their entitlement programs would run out of money fast . Plus the wall would be funded in 2 years maybe even 1 .
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram