- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Senate Democrats to introduce constitutional amendment
Posted on 4/1/19 at 4:47 pm to tarzana
Posted on 4/1/19 at 4:47 pm to tarzana
quote:
The Electoral College is the minority taking away the rights of the majority FIFY. So what's fair, or moral, about the Electoral College? It should be abolished, like, back before the Y2K election.
Typical liberal who claims to want to fight for minorites. All lies. You just want more power. Sad.
Apply your ignorant argument to black people and lunch counters. Bigot.
This post was edited on 4/1/19 at 4:48 pm
Posted on 4/1/19 at 4:50 pm to sostan
quote:
They will want to ban voting.
They will 100% blame voter suppression of minorities, illegals, lgbtqia+, etc
Posted on 4/1/19 at 4:50 pm to BamaNixon
So a-hole, shall I quote all the democrats who strenuously wanted a wall or are only republicans not allowed to ever change positions?
If I go back far enough bill clinton and al gore were pro life
If I go back far enough bill clinton and al gore were pro life
Posted on 4/1/19 at 4:53 pm to LSUDVM1999
Worked out well for them last time.
See: Senate Nuclear Option
See: Senate Nuclear Option
Posted on 4/1/19 at 4:55 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
black people and lunch counters
We're talking Electoral College, not the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Two entirely different kennels of fish.
Even Europeans were perplexed at the result of the 2016 US presidential election. How could a candidate lose when she got 3,000,000 more votes than the winner?
Posted on 4/1/19 at 4:55 pm to tarzana
If you want to dive in a true democracy, go find one and then move there. Once you have moved to that particular utopia, you had better hope that the wolves don’t outnumber the sheep when it’s time to vote on what’s for dinner.
Thank God that you live in a constitutional republic. You can attribute every gain that any minority has ever achieved in America to that simple fact, genius.
Thank God that you live in a constitutional republic. You can attribute every gain that any minority has ever achieved in America to that simple fact, genius.
Posted on 4/1/19 at 4:59 pm to tarzana
quote:
Two entirely different kennels of fish.
Posted on 4/1/19 at 5:00 pm to tarzana
quote:
Two entirely different kennels of fish.
What kind of fish do you keep in a kennel?
Posted on 4/1/19 at 5:06 pm to LSUDVM1999
so what happens if no candidate gets 50% of the vote?
Does the House of Representatives elect the President, the Constitution says that's what happens if no wins a majority of the EC, or does the plurality winner become President?
Does the House of Representatives elect the President, the Constitution says that's what happens if no wins a majority of the EC, or does the plurality winner become President?
Posted on 4/1/19 at 5:08 pm to tarzana
quote:
So what's fair, or moral, about the Electoral College? It should be abolished, like, back before the Y2K election.
You can either have the USA as constituted, with the electoral college, or you can have revolution and then dissolution without it, or you can have a brutal repression that forces us to stay in against our will.
We won’t live peacefully under a pure democracy. It just will not happen.
Posted on 4/1/19 at 5:10 pm to BamaNixon
quote:
Only idiots would want to do away with the Electoral College, right?
And sore losers still trying to find a way to win at any cost.
Posted on 4/1/19 at 5:11 pm to tarzana
quote:
quote:
The Electoral College is the minority taking away the rights of the majority
FIFY.
Why cant it be by majority of States though? I believe trump won 30 states, and clinton 20. There you go a majority beat the minority.
This post was edited on 4/1/19 at 5:15 pm
Posted on 4/1/19 at 5:12 pm to SSpaniel
quote:
What kind of fish do you keep in a kennel?
Dogfish.
Posted on 4/1/19 at 5:12 pm to tarzana
quote:
Even Europeans were perplexed at the result of the 2016 US presidential election. How could a candidate lose when she got 3,000,000 more votes than the winner?
Because that's the rules of the game. It's like saying that a football team got more yards than the opponent - interesting, but ultimately doesn't matter in determining who won the game. If the game were to get the most votes, candidates would campaign differently, and people would think differently about voting. Trump won according to the only rule that matters - he received more votes in the Electoral College. Europeans being perplexed about stuff notwithstanding.
But for the Q/MAGA crowd to criticize Democrats so harshly for something that Trump advocated AFTER he was elected is hilarious, even if it is unsurprising.
For what it's worth, I like the Electoral College in a lot of ways. What I hate is the primary system that keeps stupid shite like corn/ethanol subsidies around because Iowa is one of the first primary states for both parties. So, if you don't give those farmers their welfare, you can't get elected.
Posted on 4/1/19 at 5:13 pm to FredBear
quote:
They are just begging for a civil conflict and they may well get it someday
By trying to amend the constitution in the manner prescribed by the constitution?
Posted on 4/1/19 at 5:13 pm to tarzana
quote:
he Electoral College is the minority taking away the rights of the majority. So what's fair, or moral, about the Electoral College? It should be abolished, like, back before the Y2K election.
So... taking away the rights of the majority is unfair and immoral. Sort of like when the majority of voters pass a law mandating restrictions on abortion or gay marriage or laws requiring voter registration or something... and a liberal court overturns. I guess that's unfair and immoral as well, huh? I mean, it has to be, right?
Posted on 4/1/19 at 5:13 pm to tarzana
quote:
We're talking Electoral College, not the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Two entirely different kennels of fish.
How so? Are both in the Constitution?
quote:
Even Europeans were perplexed at the result of the 2016 US presidential election. How could a candidate lose when she got 3,000,000 more votes than the winner?
And?
Once again the liberals prove the don’t care one iota about minorites middle America or the little guy. Sad.
Posted on 4/1/19 at 5:16 pm to tarzana
quote:
The Senate is the minority taking away the rights of the majority
FIFY
Posted on 4/1/19 at 5:20 pm to bmy
quote:BMY, you just do not understand. For ideologues, it is all good and patriotic to seek amendment of the Constitution in a manner that furthers their own ends. But it is treasonous to propose a Constitutional amendment that they oppose.quote:By trying to amend the constitution in the manner prescribed by the constitution?
They are just begging for a civil conflict and they may well get it someday
These people may well technically be Americans, but they do NOT actually believe in the governmental framework provided in our Constitution.
Posted on 4/1/19 at 5:23 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
may well technically be Americans
May?
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News