- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: SCOTUS Refuses To Hear Remington's Appeal On Being Sued By Survivors Of Sandy Hook
Posted on 11/12/19 at 9:26 am to MrLarson
Posted on 11/12/19 at 9:26 am to MrLarson
What about blade manufacturers?
I dont understand why this is specifically to a gun manufacturer when people use pressure cookers to blow up marathons... anybody who produces an item that is used outside of it's original intended purposes should be sued?
I dont understand why this is specifically to a gun manufacturer when people use pressure cookers to blow up marathons... anybody who produces an item that is used outside of it's original intended purposes should be sued?
1
Posted on 11/12/19 at 9:26 am to BestBanker
Fast food and soft drink companies.
Posted on 11/12/19 at 9:26 am to MrLarson
quote:
should never have sold a weapon as dangerous as the Bushmaster AR-15-style rifle to the public
so a high end sports car involved in a deadly high speed car accident that kills someone you can sue the car manufacturer?
Posted on 11/12/19 at 9:26 am to MrLarson
Law? Who needs pesky laws???
There's a goddamned federal statute expressly for this and SCOTUS is ignoring it.
They are making a decision for an executive to go Andy Jackson on their arse.
There's a goddamned federal statute expressly for this and SCOTUS is ignoring it.
They are making a decision for an executive to go Andy Jackson on their arse.
Posted on 11/12/19 at 9:28 am to MrLarson
They "can" sue....has no bearing on the outcome of the suit.
This will bite everyone in the arse.
Chevy, how can you sell a car as fast as a Corvette knowing it can kill pedestrians?
This will bite everyone in the arse.
Chevy, how can you sell a car as fast as a Corvette knowing it can kill pedestrians?
Posted on 11/12/19 at 9:29 am to MrLarson
Can people sue Ford or Budweiser for DUI deaths?
McDonalds for heart attacks?
This can be a huge pandoras box that was just opened
McDonalds for heart attacks?
This can be a huge pandoras box that was just opened
Posted on 11/12/19 at 9:29 am to themunch
quote:
What in the actual frick is this. I did not know that gun manufacturers made software. Is this true?
No, their models are used in realistic first person shooter games because, surprise, they're going to use real life firearms in a realistic video game.
Posted on 11/12/19 at 9:30 am to GeeOH
quote:
They "can" sue....has no bearing on the outcome of the suit.
Their finding is there is a cause of action under the law in direct contradiction to the federal statute passed for this very reason.
My only thought is that this is a "state law" issue; however, because Remington is in NC, it's clear interstate commerce which means the federal statue should operate as a bar.
This is bullshite.
Posted on 11/12/19 at 9:31 am to GeeOH
Sue every city with a public works that produced clean water to fill swimming pools with...I'm sure there is a kid who has drowned in every city.
Posted on 11/12/19 at 9:32 am to MrLarson
This is how Deep State will destroy our 2nd Amendment rights. They will sue arms manufacturers right out of business.
This post was edited on 11/12/19 at 9:36 am
Posted on 11/12/19 at 9:32 am to MrLarson
How on earth does the current SCOTUS allow this?
Jesus, I would think they were better than that.
OK so further research, they didn't take the case not that they gave the case a look and allowed a lower court decision stand. My guess is IF the plaintiffs win then it will get kicked up.
I hope at least because if this goes through and stands there are sooo many ways manufacturers of pretty much anything can be sued.
Jesus, I would think they were better than that.
OK so further research, they didn't take the case not that they gave the case a look and allowed a lower court decision stand. My guess is IF the plaintiffs win then it will get kicked up.
I hope at least because if this goes through and stands there are sooo many ways manufacturers of pretty much anything can be sued.
Posted on 11/12/19 at 9:33 am to kingbob
quote:
This is such bullshite
Posted on 11/12/19 at 9:33 am to MrLarson
In 1991 I was TeeBoned by an unlicensed, uninsured drug dealer at high speed. Broke my left leg and arm as well as my right wrist. Also had 47 stitches in my head and spent 4 days in intensive care. Spent 11 days in the hospital and 6 months in rehab before returning to my job.
Well then, if that's the case I should have a lawsuit against Cheverolet because they produced the Corvette for public sale. Also the dealer who sold the car to the slimeball who hit me.
Well then, if that's the case I should have a lawsuit against Cheverolet because they produced the Corvette for public sale. Also the dealer who sold the car to the slimeball who hit me.
Posted on 11/12/19 at 9:34 am to Steadyhands
quote:
Sue every city with a public works that produced clean water to fill swimming pools with
I'm thinking more along the lines of sue all of the property owners who own the banks of a reservoir or river for containing such a harmful product.
Posted on 11/12/19 at 9:34 am to MrLarson
How did the members vote?? I found noting about the decision numbers in any of the posts or the link
was it another 5-4 with Roberts spreading his legs for the leftists??
was it another 5-4 with Roberts spreading his legs for the leftists??
Posted on 11/12/19 at 9:35 am to MrLarson
What about distillers and brewers?
How do you delineate from a dangerous weapon vs. a beverage that has a higher alcoholic content than the “baseline.” Or a pre-made cocktail that masks the alcohol flavor thus making it more dangerous?
Talk about your slippery slope, thanks SCOTUS. LA Trial Lawyers just got a whole new batch of companies to fleece.
How do you delineate from a dangerous weapon vs. a beverage that has a higher alcoholic content than the “baseline.” Or a pre-made cocktail that masks the alcohol flavor thus making it more dangerous?
Talk about your slippery slope, thanks SCOTUS. LA Trial Lawyers just got a whole new batch of companies to fleece.
Posted on 11/12/19 at 9:35 am to MrLarson
I am suing Little Debbie for making me fat
Posted on 11/12/19 at 9:36 am to ShakeandBake
quote:
Wow. That’s a huge can of worms being opened for all kinds of product liability suits in the future
Cars manufacturers
Alcohol producers
Big Pharma
Fast food restaurants
Soda producers
Plaintiff lawyer scum be like...
This is going to be so much fun!!
This post was edited on 11/12/19 at 9:38 am
Posted on 11/12/19 at 9:36 am to MrLarson
I’ll allow it. Isn’t it wonderful how trump has transformed the USSC in such a short time?
Posted on 11/12/19 at 9:38 am to MrLarson
Im suing Bud Light and Im calling JUAN LAFONTA!!
Page 2 of 6
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News