- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Schumer wants GOP senators to have an open mind
Posted on 1/17/20 at 12:45 pm
Posted on 1/17/20 at 12:45 pm
They should be non-partisan and objective in evaluating the evidence.
Does that mean that Schumer will vote to acquit if the preponderance of evidence leans that way? Anyone wanta guess the odds that Chuck will surprise us all and vote for acquittal?
Does that mean that Schumer will vote to acquit if the preponderance of evidence leans that way? Anyone wanta guess the odds that Chuck will surprise us all and vote for acquittal?
Posted on 1/17/20 at 12:46 pm to Zach
quote:
Anyone wanta guess the odds that Chuck will surprise us all and vote for acquittal?
Posted on 1/17/20 at 12:47 pm to Zach
Just let the first hand witnesses talk.
Enough whining about 2nd hand testimony.
Enough whining about 2nd hand testimony.
Posted on 1/17/20 at 12:48 pm to Zach
Does Schmucky mean "open" as in the way the House conducted their shampeachment inquiry/hearing?
Posted on 1/17/20 at 12:50 pm to Zach
quote:
Does that mean that Schumer will vote to acquit if the preponderance of evidence leans that way?
Why preponderance?
Posted on 1/17/20 at 12:50 pm to Zach
quote:the burden is always on Republicans.
Schumer wants GOP senators to have an open mind
This post was edited on 1/17/20 at 12:51 pm
Posted on 1/17/20 at 12:51 pm to Zach
Screw him. He needs to practice what he preaches and have a talk with his peers in the House.
Posted on 1/17/20 at 12:51 pm to Zach
I can absolutely guarantee the R senators' minds are a good 50% more open than Schumer or Harry Reid was on their most open-minded day ever serving.
Posted on 1/17/20 at 12:52 pm to Zach
quote:
Schumer wants
People in hell want ice water
Posted on 1/17/20 at 12:52 pm to CelticDog
quote:
Just let the first hand witnesses talk. Enough whining about 2nd hand testimony.
quote:Please do us all a favor and kill yourself so the world can be a better place
CelticDog
Posted on 1/17/20 at 12:53 pm to KosmoCramer
quote:Valid point. The Constitution outlines no evidentiary standard. A Senator can vote to convict because Trump wears his neck tie too long.quote:Why preponderance?
Does that mean that Schumer will vote to acquit if the preponderance of evidence leans that way?
Posted on 1/17/20 at 12:54 pm to CelticDog
quote:
Just let the first hand witnesses talk.
They already have. The democrats just didn't like what they had to say.
Posted on 1/17/20 at 12:54 pm to Zach
meanwhile there is a 1000% chance Needle-nose Chuck has already made up his mind.
Posted on 1/17/20 at 12:56 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Valid point. The Constitution outlines no evidentiary standard. A Senator can vote to convict because Trump wears his neck tie too long.
While technically true, it is clear that up until recently no one actually considered APPLYING such a fricking idiot level of silliness to impeachment.
If they had, we would have had SEVERAL Presidents removed before now.
Posted on 1/17/20 at 12:56 pm to Zach
quote:And then vote for removal since he's guilty. Right? Right?
Schumer wants GOP senators to have an open mind
Schumer says whatever is written on his index cards. It would be hilarious to have some MAGA spy sneak in and swap out his OMB cards for OMgood ones. Schumer would never notice and just read what was on the cards.
Posted on 1/17/20 at 12:57 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Valid point. The Constitution outlines no evidentiary standard. A Senator can vote to convict because Trump wears his neck tie too long.
OK, so is there a chance Schumer will vote for acquittal? If not, then he's not being open minded.
Posted on 1/17/20 at 12:58 pm to Zach
If the democrats weren't disingenuous they would be nothing at all
Posted on 1/17/20 at 12:59 pm to AggieHank86
quote:Clearly, this is what the founders had in mind.
The Constitution outlines no evidentiary standard. A Senator can vote to convict because Trump wears his neck tie too long.
Posted on 1/17/20 at 1:00 pm to CelticDog
quote:
Just let the first hand witnesses talk.
So Eric Ciaramella, Schiff and his bug-eyed staff, Atkinson, and Vindman for the limited purpose of answering the pubs' questions that Schiff refused to allow be answered, so that we can finally learn the full extent of the coup plotting that went on.
Posted on 1/17/20 at 1:00 pm to ShortyRob
quote:Agreed.
ShortyRob
Incrementalism.
Billy Jeff did not do anything that would justify impeachment on the merits either, though lying about an extramarital affair in a depo is certainly worse than anything Trump seems to have done.
The next impeachment may WELL be based upon necktie color.
Sad.
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News