- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Rush just mentioned Justice Kennedy's take on Gay Wedding cake case
Posted on 12/7/17 at 3:46 pm to SDVTiger
Posted on 12/7/17 at 3:46 pm to SDVTiger
quote:
Not sure why you think you didnt have the choice to change teams
silliness.
physical ability is not all that makes up sexuality.
That is silliness
0
Posted on 12/7/17 at 3:47 pm to BlackHelicopterPilot
quote:
I don't think percentages should matter. If a wedding planner happens to be a devout Christian and opposes gay marriage on that ground, I believe said planner should be able to decline the job.
Even if 100% of the business is in "weddings"
Not disagreeing with you, but calling it "special accommodations" or "going above and beyond" when you do the exact same thing for 40% of your customers is a bunch of bullshite.
Posted on 12/7/17 at 3:50 pm to Salmon
quote:
I don't know about you, but I don't remember this choice in my life
Your confusion is that you equate attraction with acts associated with being attracted. They aren't the same.
This should be clear given that the case is about a baker not wanting to bake a cake for a gay wedding...not about a baker not wanting to bake a cake for someone who is attracted to the same sex.
Posted on 12/7/17 at 3:51 pm to Green Chili Tiger
quote:
Not disagreeing with you, but calling it "special accommodations" or "going above and beyond" when you do the exact same thing for 40% of your customers is a bunch of bullshite.
Depends on his volume too.
4/10 customers total would be special. 400/1000 not as special.
Posted on 12/7/17 at 3:52 pm to Salmon
quote:
so you are only gay if you act upon it?
In the context of this case, the act is the wedding. That's what's being argued...not being attracted to a same sex individual.
Posted on 12/7/17 at 3:54 pm to moneyg
quote:
In the context of this case, the act is the wedding. That's what's being argued...
That isn't what the OP was stating but has now been clarified
the OP was confused which caused my confusion
This post was edited on 12/7/17 at 3:54 pm
Posted on 12/7/17 at 3:54 pm to Salmon
quote:
all that to set up a gay joke? kinda disappointed
What joke? You had the choice and still do
Posted on 12/7/17 at 3:55 pm to SDVTiger
quote:
You had the choice and still do
Nope. I cannot choose my attraction.
Posted on 12/7/17 at 4:00 pm to Sidicous
quote:Not to mention that "special" doesn't have to be about volume at all but the additional effort. If it takes 3 hours to make a generic cake and 8 hours to make a specialty cake, it doesn't matter what the volume is as the specialty cake obviously would require more time, effort, and personalization.
Depends on his volume too.
4/10 customers total would be special. 400/1000 not as special.
Posted on 12/7/17 at 4:00 pm to Salmon
quote:
Nope. I cannot choose my attraction.
Well we will agree to disagree then
Posted on 12/7/17 at 4:01 pm to SDVTiger
quote:
Well we will agree to disagree then
You can force yourself to be attracted to someone?
Posted on 12/7/17 at 4:05 pm to Salmon
I didn’t know Salmon had the gay.
Do your kids know?
Do your kids know?
Posted on 12/7/17 at 4:06 pm to Salmon
quote:
You can force yourself to be attracted to someone?
I have the choice to be attracted to someone or not. Where are you getting forced from
Posted on 12/7/17 at 4:16 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
Not to mention that "special" doesn't have to be about volume at all but the additional effort. If it takes 3 hours to make a generic cake and 8 hours to make a specialty cake, it doesn't matter what the volume is as the specialty cake obviously would require more time, effort, and personalization.
Could also be $ volume. A wedding cake could be (probably is) much more expensive than standardized shop output. So the 40%, is that $ or product? A single large cake for the area's biggest nuptial of the year could be the entire 40% if measuring dollars.
Posted on 12/7/17 at 4:35 pm to Green Chili Tiger
quote:
Not disagreeing with you, but calling it "special accommodations" or "going above and beyond" when you do the exact same thing for 40% of your customers is a bunch of bullshite.
It doesn't matter if he performs the same service for 100% of his customers, not using his artistic ability to design a cake celebrating a gay wedding is not discrimination based on the couple being gay, it is discrimination based on the couple's actions which is not illegal since their actions are not protected by law. I don't understand why the distinction is so difficult to understand.
This post was edited on 12/7/17 at 4:37 pm
Posted on 12/7/17 at 4:37 pm to SDVTiger
If you chose to, could you derive sexual satisfaction from sucking off Cristiano Ronaldo?
Posted on 12/7/17 at 4:37 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
f you chose to, could you derive sexual satisfaction from sucking off Cristiano Ronaldo?
He's a very pretty man
Posted on 12/7/17 at 4:39 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
If you chose to, could you derive sexual satisfaction from sucking off Cristiano Ronaldo?
Im sure if I chose to be forgy
Posted on 12/7/17 at 4:41 pm to BlackHelicopterPilot
He’s always my example of sexual attraction not being a choice. He’s objectively a gorgeous dude, but I don’t want to frick him.
Same thing as Rosie O’Donnell. She’s a chick, but I doubt many here would be sexually attracted to her.
If you’re a proponent of binary, non-choice sexuality then I don’t know how you can reconcile the two examples.
Same thing as Rosie O’Donnell. She’s a chick, but I doubt many here would be sexually attracted to her.
If you’re a proponent of binary, non-choice sexuality then I don’t know how you can reconcile the two examples.
Posted on 12/7/17 at 4:42 pm to BlackHelicopterPilot
quote:
He's a very pretty man
He's got crazy eyes........and he's kind of bronzy.
Page 6 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News