Started By
Message

re: Rudy dropping bombs on Fox and Friends this morning.

Posted on 1/24/20 at 9:36 am to
Posted by The Maj
Member since Sep 2016
27041 posts
Posted on 1/24/20 at 9:36 am to
quote:

because you can't trust anyone


Why you standing behind an alter? Perhaps you spouted so much bullshite with the other account it is not longer seen as anything more than pitiful...

Posted by blackinthesaddle
Alabama
Member since Jan 2013
1732 posts
Posted on 1/24/20 at 9:38 am to
quote:

So you don't think Biden being on the dole of a country he is politically over is worth discussing.....because it doesn't, according to you, involve impeachment? (Which is ALL that matters to the left apparently.) Seriously...whether you think Trump was wrong for asking the question.....the question obviously needs to be asked. So why is it so "dreadful" to even bring it up? All I hear is dems saying "He did nothing wrong. This has been debunked." It's anything but. If Giuliani has evidence....whether that evidence "distracts" from the monkey show that is this impeachment...it really shouldn't matter. If Biden did the shite, he needs to be brought to task for it...whether he is running for office or not. Why is this so hard to understand?


You missed the part where I said it was fine to bring Biden to trial...his own trial though.

You don't get to piggy-back on someone else's trial. Every defendant gets a separate one.
Posted by thedentist45
Louisiana
Member since Jun 2008
557 posts
Posted on 1/24/20 at 9:39 am to
quote:

You missed the part where I said it was fine to bring Biden to trial...his own trial though. You don't get to piggy-back on someone else's trial. Every defendant gets a separate one.


I've heard recently the court system takes a long time to get things done. Might be faster to piggyback.
Posted by ninthward
Boston, MA
Member since May 2007
20374 posts
Posted on 1/24/20 at 9:41 am to
quote:

You missed the part where I said it was fine to bring Biden to trial...his own trial though.

You don't get to piggy-back on someone else's trial. Every defendant gets a separate one.


This isn't a court in Orleans Parish also being called as a witness is not piggybacking. Where do you come up with this shite?

Posted by rumproast
Member since Dec 2003
12093 posts
Posted on 1/24/20 at 9:43 am to
Well...the two are connected to some degree. I believe that if Biden was part of or profiting from a giant corrupt company, then Trump had every reason to request an investigation of the corruption. Biden, if what has been said is true, is part and parcel of the problem. Trump has every right to make sure that American tax dollars are not being mis-applied...even if such mis-application results in their ending up in Joe Biden's bank account. That is EXACTLY the corruption Trump was talking about. So, whether Joe and Hunter were part of it has direct relevance as to whether Trump's request was political or in the best interest of the country. And, if Biden played a part in "hiding" the corruption by using influence to force them to fire a prosecutor investigating it, that is likewise directly linked to the corruption.
This post was edited on 1/24/20 at 9:45 am
Posted by The Maj
Member since Sep 2016
27041 posts
Posted on 1/24/20 at 9:43 am to
thedentist45
LSU Fan
Louisiana
Member since Jun 2008
300 posts

Online


Amazing, two in one thread...
Posted by dafif
Member since Jan 2019
5535 posts
Posted on 1/24/20 at 9:44 am to
blackinthesaddle

quote:

You missed the part where I said it was fine to bring Biden to trial...his own trial though.

You don't get to piggy-back on someone else's trial. Every defendant gets a separate one.


You obviously have never watched Perry Mason...

eta: And Trump, just like Perry, never loses!
This post was edited on 1/24/20 at 9:45 am
Posted by thedentist45
Louisiana
Member since Jun 2008
557 posts
Posted on 1/24/20 at 9:45 am to
Nah. I was just a lurker for a while.
Posted by AMS
Member since Apr 2016
6495 posts
Posted on 1/24/20 at 9:49 am to
Maybe Biden gets To be a witness in his own trial after he testifies in this trial.

its central to the trump defense that there was reasonable suspicion. And guess what, obama admin had reasonable suspicion and tried to cover it up. If it was enough to arise concern for obama admin, its good enough to bring concern to trump admin. This wrecks the abuse of power charge, and executive privilege wrecks the obstruction charge.

Biden is 100% relevant in the current trail, house managers agree and spent a day addressing Biden. Why would they spend so much of their limited time on the subject of Biden and his role when Biden is irrelevant to their case?
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
59535 posts
Posted on 1/24/20 at 9:53 am to
quote:

Spoiler alert: its not true.



Posted by blackinthesaddle
Alabama
Member since Jan 2013
1732 posts
Posted on 1/24/20 at 9:53 am to
A monarchy can be fascist. Jesus, you are on a poli board, at least google terms you don't know.
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
27344 posts
Posted on 1/24/20 at 9:54 am to
The press has decided this is a conspiracy theory and therefore will not investigate or cover.

It is sort of like Devin Nunes and his contention that there was going to be a railroad job based on imaginary evidence on Trump. Or.... the conspiracy theory about FISA court abuses by FBI types on aTrump supporter.....or...John Solomon's investigations that are sourced vs WaPo stories based on rumor but Solomon was peddling a conspiracy theory....right?
This post was edited on 1/24/20 at 9:55 am
Posted by sms151t
Polos, Porsches, Ponies..PROBATION
Member since Aug 2009
139837 posts
Posted on 1/24/20 at 9:56 am to
Actually no it can’t. But you don’t get that. Fascism is a political System or rule as is a monarchy. but you should know this.

This post was edited on 1/24/20 at 9:57 am
Posted by blackinthesaddle
Alabama
Member since Jan 2013
1732 posts
Posted on 1/24/20 at 9:57 am to
quote:

Why you standing behind an alter?


The righteous always preach from behind the alter.
Posted by The Maj
Member since Sep 2016
27041 posts
Posted on 1/24/20 at 9:57 am to
quote:

A monarchy can be fascist.


Let's see, this alter likes to use the term "fascist"... Hmmm... Who could it be...
Posted by BilJ
Member since Sep 2003
158722 posts
Posted on 1/24/20 at 10:04 am to
ainlsey almost makes that show watchable
Posted by blackinthesaddle
Alabama
Member since Jan 2013
1732 posts
Posted on 1/24/20 at 10:04 am to
quote:

Actually no it can’t. But you don’t get that. Fascism is a political System or rule as is a monarchy. but you should know this.


Fascists believe that liberal democracy is obsolete and regard the complete mobilization of society under a totalitarian one-party state as necessary to prepare a nation for armed conflict and to respond effectively to economic difficulties.[9] Such a state is led by a strong leader—such as a dictator and a martial government composed of the members of the governing fascist party—to forge national unity and maintain a stable and orderly society.[9] Fascism rejects assertions that violence is automatically negative in nature and views political violence, war and imperialism as means that can achieve national rejuvenation.[10][11] Fascists advocate a mixed economy, with the principal goal of achieving autarky (national economic self-sufficiency) through protectionist and interventionist economic policies.[12]

Now, sir, how would a militaristic monarchy not be fascist? For a militaristic monarchy is merely fascism with the title of nobility.
Posted by DemonKA3268
Parts Unknown
Member since Oct 2015
19190 posts
Posted on 1/24/20 at 10:06 am to
quote:

Fascists believe that liberal democracy is obsolete and regard the complete mobilization of society under a totalitarian one-party state as necessary to prepare a nation for armed conflict and to respond effectively to economic difficulties.[9] Such a state is led by a strong leader—such as a dictator and a martial government composed of the members of the governing fascist party—to forge national unity and maintain a stable and orderly society.[9] Fascism rejects assertions that violence is automatically negative in nature and views political violence, war and imperialism as means that can achieve national rejuvenation.[10][11] Fascists advocate a mixed economy, with the principal goal of achieving autarky (national economic self-sufficiency) through protectionist and interventionist economic policies.[12] Now, sir, how would a militaristic monarchy not be fascist? For a militaristic monarchy is merely fascism with the title of nobility.


Posted by blackinthesaddle
Alabama
Member since Jan 2013
1732 posts
Posted on 1/24/20 at 10:06 am to
quote:

Let's see, this alter likes to use the term "fascist"... Hmmm... Who could it be...


Who indeed? My guess is the Easter Bunny. Now tell me yours.
Posted by blackinthesaddle
Alabama
Member since Jan 2013
1732 posts
Posted on 1/24/20 at 10:09 am to
Yawning is often a sign of distress in dogs. Perhaps seeing fascism defined while thinking about Trump made you realize that you're on the wrong side of history.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram