- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Rep Adam Schiff defends the unmasking of Trump associates
Posted on 3/26/17 at 7:37 pm
Posted on 3/26/17 at 7:37 pm
LINK /
Q: Congressman, I want to start with something Chairman Nunes of the committee said. He suggested that some private citizens had been unmasked as a part of a surveillance effort. If, in fact, that were true, that would be a big deal, wouldn’t it?
This begs the question, what intelligence was being sought after for the unmasking of names to be necessary. Remember, Nunes said these communications had nothing to do with Russia
Q: Congressman, I want to start with something Chairman Nunes of the committee said. He suggested that some private citizens had been unmasked as a part of a surveillance effort. If, in fact, that were true, that would be a big deal, wouldn’t it?
quote:
A: Well, it all depends.
There are perfectly appropriate circumstances to unmask the names of people. In fact, that is done quite often. And the standard is whether the unmasking of those names is necessary to determine the significance of the intelligence.
This begs the question, what intelligence was being sought after for the unmasking of names to be necessary. Remember, Nunes said these communications had nothing to do with Russia
10
Posted on 3/26/17 at 7:39 pm to joshnorris14
Schiff is being a good little Democrat. Spreading lies and misleading
Posted on 3/26/17 at 7:45 pm to joshnorris14
quote:
This begs the question, what intelligence was being sought after for the unmasking of names to be necessary. Remember, Nunes said these communications had nothing to do with Russia
It also suggests that everyone is immediately unmasked to determine the "Significance" of the conversation.
Everyone I am sure remembers the Greek Saying found in the ruins:
Who will watch the Watchers - I am questioning if we should dump the Patriot Act in total
This post was edited on 3/26/17 at 7:54 pm
Posted on 3/26/17 at 7:46 pm to bencoleman
Schiff is a snake, one sneaky mofo.
Posted on 3/26/17 at 7:48 pm to TOPAL
quote:
Schiff is a snake, one sneaky mofo.
I was thinking "worm" but we're on the same page
Posted on 3/26/17 at 7:58 pm to joshnorris14
Modern day Joe McCarthy
Posted on 3/26/17 at 8:01 pm to DaGarun
The devil will get Schiff for lying 
Posted on 3/26/17 at 8:03 pm to TOPAL
There are people to whom one can experience an instant, visceral, intuitive reaction and yes, this man reads as a snake. The eyes, body language, and voice all reinforce "shifty" - he is aptly named
Posted on 3/26/17 at 8:03 pm to joshnorris14
quote:
Adam Schiff defends the unmasking of Trump associates
Exactly as i said democrats would.
They have absolutely no problem with the idea of the party in power using government against the opposition.
Well. I mean. Now they'd have a problem with it........
Posted on 3/26/17 at 8:08 pm to joshnorris14
quote:Of course there are. It isn't the federal offense that you would like it to be.
There are perfectly appropriate circumstances to unmask the names of people.
Posted on 3/26/17 at 8:10 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
f course there are. It isn't the federal offense that you would like it to be.
The bar for doing so against the opposition party during an election should be high.
VERY frickING HIGH.
Like, absurdly high.
If anyone on either side can't comprehend why that is, they're idiots
This post was edited on 3/26/17 at 8:11 pm
Posted on 3/26/17 at 8:13 pm to ShortyRob
This is the problem with a perpetual surveillance state.
The information is always available.
That's just REALLY tempting for politicians.
Hell. Schumer practically gloated over acquiring Romneys returns.
And, i have no doubt that given the opportunity, plenty of Republicans would give in to the temptation also.
The good of doing it is just TREMENDOUSLY outweighed by the dangers
The information is always available.
That's just REALLY tempting for politicians.
Hell. Schumer practically gloated over acquiring Romneys returns.
And, i have no doubt that given the opportunity, plenty of Republicans would give in to the temptation also.
The good of doing it is just TREMENDOUSLY outweighed by the dangers
Posted on 3/26/17 at 8:18 pm to joshnorris14
He's so full of shite. The law is very clear, Gowdy set this fool up to be ruined
Posted on 3/26/17 at 8:43 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
Of course there are. It isn't the federal offense that you would like it to be.
According to Nunez, it is.
So frick you commie.
Posted on 3/26/17 at 10:06 pm to joshnorris14
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/10/21 at 7:33 pm
Posted on 3/26/17 at 10:40 pm to joshnorris14
So now he is admitting they did exactly what Trump said they did, which they ridiculed him for, but since they got caught, it is okay?
Man, these people redefine scum downward every day.
Man, these people redefine scum downward every day.
Posted on 3/26/17 at 11:25 pm to antibarner
quote:
The devil will get Schiff for lying
Actually the devil appreciates all his little helpers such as Schiff...he will get some earthly props for his chicanery.
Posted on 3/26/17 at 11:36 pm to joshnorris14
LINK /
Posted on 3/27/17 at 9:46 am to joshnorris14
Wow.
Hey Josh, which twitter feed usually has when Nunes is going to hold a presser?
Any news on Nunes today?
Hey Josh, which twitter feed usually has when Nunes is going to hold a presser?
Any news on Nunes today?
Posted on 3/27/17 at 9:49 am to cajunangelle
That cuck douchelord from MSNBC broke it last time. Adam something
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News