- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Red Pilled America ( The fake science behind the hockey stick climate graph)
Posted on 3/20/19 at 5:24 am
Posted on 3/20/19 at 5:24 am
Very good podcast that studies the data and the data collecting techniques of the climate change scientist.
This particular episode features a scientist who studied the data and found anomolies and flat out mischaracterizations. He later formed a group with other climate change skeptics and got his hands on the info used to formulate the famous hockey stick graph which is the basis for much of modern climate change science today.
Youtube
This particular episode features a scientist who studied the data and found anomolies and flat out mischaracterizations. He later formed a group with other climate change skeptics and got his hands on the info used to formulate the famous hockey stick graph which is the basis for much of modern climate change science today.
Youtube
Posted on 3/20/19 at 6:18 am to Revelator
Ha. Just wait. Just wait to see what happens in another 30 years you racist bigot.
Posted on 3/20/19 at 6:25 am to Deuces
Melting sea ice is flooding Nebraska right this minute, and you have the nerve to joke about climate warming!!
Posted on 3/20/19 at 7:17 am to Revelator
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=9XEbX8WbWXM
quote:
Scientific "Correctness" vs. Scientific Progress | Space News
19,017 views 1.2K 16 Share Save Report ThunderboltsProject 146,901 subscribers SUBSCRIBE
Published on Mar 9, 2019 In this adaptation of a recent Thunderbolts Picture of the Day article, author Mel Acheson explores how a phenomenon he calls "scientific correctness" can ultimately impede scientific progress.
quote:
But there are things that obstruct this process. One I’ll call “scientific correctness”: The (proper) concern that a theory is “correct” or “right” or “true”, that it “fits” or explains the relevant data, becomes confused with a pseudo-religious “Right” or True” that exceeds the cognitive domain of the paradigm. All other ideas come to be judged by the standards of the one. “Crackpot” becomes a term of dismissal rather than one of mere differentiation. The process of discovery gets lost in defensiveness.
A recent example of this is the behavior of the astronomical establishment toward Halton Arp. His observations of connections between quasars and galaxies put the brakes on the expanding universe and exploded the Big Bang hypothesis. But instead of saying, “Here’s an interesting observation; we don’t have time for it, but let’s see what he can make of it,” the reaction was, “Deny him telescope time and refuse to publish his findings and crop out quasars on photos of galaxies.”
Contrast “scientific correctness” with the concept of “domain of validity”. The former assumes that its paradigm is “right” and that all further observations can be explained, requiring at most tinkering with the details. This assumption of continuous cumulation of knowledge becomes absolute and straitjackets further discovery. It leads to stasis and intellectual death. With the latter, science is seen not as the establishment of a catechism but as a process of discovering the borders. It assumes the continuous cumulation of knowledge within a paradigm will reach a limit. The cup of the paradigm will fill up, will reach a limit of explanatory power, and observations will spill over, that is, will be ill explained or unexplained. A new, bigger cup will be needed, a paradigm with a larger domain. In deference to Stephen J. Gould and Niles Eldredge, this could be called “punctuated cumulation”.
Thus, one mark of a good paradigm is that it leads to its own replacement. This is the effect of Popper’s criterion of falsification. It means “true” knowledge is, in this larger sense, ultimately “false”. That doesn’t mean the knowledge isn’t useful for its time. It merely means we need to maintain a sense of humility in the face of our, and our theories’, mortality. Scientific correctness rejects old paradigms as “wrong” and their proponents as stupid or evil. There can be only one “right” paradigm. With domains of validity, many paradigms can be accepted as true within their limits. Their intelligibility and the intelligence of their innovators can be appreciated. Science becomes a tool box with many tools (paradigms) that can be chosen according to their appropriateness for solving particular problems: geocentrism for siting a house, heliocentrism for sending a robot to Mars, something yet to be worked out for explaining quasars.
Scientific correctness masquerades in the dress of science, but it’s only a mannequin without the vitality of science. In contrast with the three aspects of cognition, scientific correctness refuses to look at new observations, refrains from considering new ideas, and disdains to verify new insights. It’s essentially anti-intelligent. It confuses verification with conformity; it replaces the innovations of intelligence with the parroting of dogma; it lacks the provisionality that keeps science always on the move. It’s a tyrant of stasis.
Posted on 3/20/19 at 7:29 am to Revelator
"Climate change" has become astonishingly similar to heliocentric beliefs with those even daring to question it being Galileo'd.
Posted on 3/20/19 at 7:32 am to ThinePreparedAni
Thanks for posting. "Scientific correctness" is the perfect term for what is going on with climate observations. I had not thought of it with that term, and following explanation. But the vehemence the left demonstrates and the denigration they show towards us fits the explanation perfectly.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News