Started By
Message
locked post

POTUS Executive Order regarding Sanctuary Cities ruled Unconstitutional

Posted on 8/1/18 at 1:45 pm
Posted by Lg
Hayden, Alabama
Member since Jul 2011
6786 posts
Posted on 8/1/18 at 1:45 pm
LINK

quote:

A U.S. appeals court ruled Wednesday it is unconstitutional for the Trump administration to threaten to withhold funding from “sanctuary cities” that aren’t cooperating with immigration officials.

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, however, also ruled that a lower court went too far when it blocked the order nationwide.
Posted by asurob1
On the edge of the galaxy
Member since May 2009
26971 posts
Posted on 8/1/18 at 1:46 pm to
That's gonna leave a mark.
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
59485 posts
Posted on 8/1/18 at 1:47 pm to
It always gives me special joy to be the first to DV one of your posts. It's like I'm fulfilling a patriotic duty.
Posted by Stacked
Member since Apr 2012
5675 posts
Posted on 8/1/18 at 1:47 pm to
Shall we hear from the Supreme Court?
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
98396 posts
Posted on 8/1/18 at 1:47 pm to
quote:

That's gonna leave a mark


9th Circuit isn't the Supreme Court.

Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69227 posts
Posted on 8/1/18 at 1:48 pm to
Regardless of the funding issue, how can anyone be ok with sanctuary cities?

They are irresponsible
Posted by DallasTiger11
Los Angeles
Member since Mar 2004
11804 posts
Posted on 8/1/18 at 1:48 pm to
Why do you pretend you like Reagan?
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
73082 posts
Posted on 8/1/18 at 1:48 pm to
quote:

That's gonna leave a mark.


Yeah the liberal judges when Thomas goes scorched earth on them
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
94742 posts
Posted on 8/1/18 at 1:48 pm to
Posted by NikolaiJakov
Moscow
Member since Mar 2014
2803 posts
Posted on 8/1/18 at 1:49 pm to
quote:

Shall we hear from the Supreme Court?


Did they overrule it because it's Congress' job to fund?

Or just because they didn't like it....which would be a typical 9th circuit decision.
Posted by EZE Tiger Fan
Member since Jul 2004
50205 posts
Posted on 8/1/18 at 1:49 pm to
9th Circuit. What a shock.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
98396 posts
Posted on 8/1/18 at 1:49 pm to
If the Congressional GOP had any sack, they would put a condition of cooperation in every spending bill that sends any money to a local government.
Posted by EGCROSS
Northern Idaho
Member since Dec 2007
1353 posts
Posted on 8/1/18 at 1:50 pm to
So does that mean the federal government can’t hold funds for anything anymore like LA hwy money when we didn’t want to raise the drinking age? Of course not only with liberal crazy crap that makes no logical sense.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
56330 posts
Posted on 8/1/18 at 1:50 pm to
quote:

Why do you pretend you like Reagan?



The obvious answer is that he's hiding from who he really is. If he listed what he really believed in and how he actually lives his life, it would be very clear what he stands for.

It's easier just to pretend to be something different.
Posted by HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
Member since Feb 2017
12458 posts
Posted on 8/1/18 at 1:50 pm to
At what point does Trump tell these courts to frick off, I mean what with him being an authoritarian and all

You liberals are such dumb fricks.


Also, ruling is correct, the federal government can't withhold funds it's already agreed to give, it can however, refuse to make deals in the future and anyone with a lick of sense IE not a a Democrat, would know that they can refuse to offer future deals to so called sanctuary cities.

Posted by Gaspergou202
Metairie, LA
Member since Jun 2016
13493 posts
Posted on 8/1/18 at 1:51 pm to
Just in time for Kavanaugh to say, “over ruled”.
Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 8/1/18 at 1:51 pm to
quote:

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, however, also ruled that a lower court went too far when it blocked the order nationwide.


Liberals should be scared shitless about this.

Nationwide injunctions in lower courts are illegal and not the job of a district court or even an appeals court.

That's the job of the Supremes, Congress or the President.
Posted by SSpaniel
Germantown
Member since Feb 2013
29658 posts
Posted on 8/1/18 at 1:51 pm to
quote:

That's gonna leave a mark.


For the 9th Circuit when the Supreme Court gets it...
Posted by Sidicous
Middle of Nowhere
Member since Aug 2015
17093 posts
Posted on 8/1/18 at 1:52 pm to
quote:

Shall we hear from the Supreme Court?




Should at the very least be sure to spend the grant money on the cost to defend against this mess. Be sure to cut checks to the places/entities actually in compliance 1st too as the rest is disputed pending appeal. Which defunds the sanctuary places by attrition...
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
421188 posts
Posted on 8/1/18 at 1:52 pm to
quote:

That's gonna leave a mark.


quote:

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals,


uh...no. the 9th Circuit has been overturned a shitload in these anti-Trump rulings. has one of their major decisions been sustained yet?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram