Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Poll, does Ford even show up Thursday?

Posted on 9/24/18 at 8:11 pm
Posted by Costanza
Member since May 2011
3148 posts
Posted on 9/24/18 at 8:11 pm
With Weinstein calling for another delay and FBI investigation, I’m thinking no. This all feels choreographed and scripted.


Upvote for Ford and Cav testifying Thursday

Downvote for her not showing up
This post was edited on 9/24/18 at 8:12 pm
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111494 posts
Posted on 9/24/18 at 8:12 pm to
No.

The calendar is a shot across the bow.

And her hand would start melting if she put it on the Bible.
Posted by Wolfhound45
Hanging with Chicken in Lurkistan
Member since Nov 2009
120000 posts
Posted on 9/24/18 at 8:13 pm to
She don’t want none of that. She is going to take a hard pass.
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
41642 posts
Posted on 9/24/18 at 8:14 pm to
Probably shows up and offers nothing new. Makes a fool of herself and embarrasses the Democrats while they in turn accuse the Republicans of being sexist meanie heads.
Posted by TakingStock
Member since Jun 2009
6090 posts
Posted on 9/24/18 at 8:14 pm to
No way. Something will come up Wednesday evening and she will back out. Kavanaugh needs to testify and McConnell needs to bring this to a vote to confirm Kavanaugh on Friday.
Posted by braindeadboxer
Utopia
Member since Nov 2011
8742 posts
Posted on 9/24/18 at 8:15 pm to
She might be a politically motivated whore, but I wouldn’t think she earned a PhD being completely stupid. Her testifying has two horrible outcomes...

1) Being exposed as a lying whore

2) Perjury
This post was edited on 9/24/18 at 8:16 pm
Posted by Jumbo_Gumbo
Denham Springs
Member since Dec 2015
5691 posts
Posted on 9/24/18 at 8:15 pm to
She won’t show
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111494 posts
Posted on 9/24/18 at 8:16 pm to
quote:

Kavanaugh needs to testify and McConnell needs to bring this to a vote to confirm Kavanaugh on Friday.


If she doesn’t show up, under oath, to accuse him, he doesn’t need to testify to shite.
Posted by TakingStock
Member since Jun 2009
6090 posts
Posted on 9/24/18 at 8:18 pm to
quote:

If she doesn’t show up, under oath, to accuse him, he doesn’t need to testify to shite.



Oh, I agree, but do you think Republicans have the guts to enforce that?
Posted by indianswim
Plano, TX
Member since Jan 2010
18698 posts
Posted on 9/24/18 at 8:18 pm to
Mitch threw down the gauntlet earlier today. If she doesn’t show, it’s time to vote. No more delays.
Posted by Costanza
Member since May 2011
3148 posts
Posted on 9/24/18 at 8:18 pm to
bullshite, if she doesn’t show, Kav needs to testify, go scorched earth, and they need to vote on Friday.
This post was edited on 9/24/18 at 8:19 pm
Posted by lctiger
Member since Oct 2003
3287 posts
Posted on 9/24/18 at 8:20 pm to
Do any on the committee go there with regards to personal questioning outside of these specific allegations?

Why were you and husband in therapy?
How many sexual partners?
Why did you clear social media?


Somebody is going to have to ask the questions that truly get to the bottom of "credible witness"
Posted by Stuckinthe90s
Dallas, TX
Member since Apr 2013
2576 posts
Posted on 9/24/18 at 8:21 pm to
If she shows up, I expect her to answer a lot of “I do not recall” answers and really only says that he touched her and she felt fearful for her life. She will not give anything concrete enough for him to attempt to disprove.

UNLESS she some how negotiated a testimony not under oath, then I expect her to give very terrible details after a media company leaks his calendar.

My money is that something happens on Wednesday and she claims that if the court isn’t willing to give Ms. Ramirez a voice in the court and “countless” other victims of Brett Kavanaugh then she will protest this injustice and not testify. In this scenario there will always be unending reasons she cannot testify.

It’s a shame, I would not be this cynical if she hadn’t hired Dem operatives to represent her, if she hadn’t shopped her story to WAPO, if Feinstein would have been prompt in her handling of the letter, and if she had never taken it upon herself to get a lie detector test while at the same time saying she did not want to be identified and evil republicans leaked her name. I can at least identify the reasons not to trust this lady, but for a lot of people I am sure this just makes them think that women are lying all the time when a claim like this comes up and they won’t believe the women when it is real.
This post was edited on 9/24/18 at 8:27 pm
Posted by TigerRanter
Louisiana
Member since Feb 2005
6703 posts
Posted on 9/24/18 at 8:24 pm to
If Grassley was dumb enough to let her not testify under oath, then frick everything.
Posted by Costanza
Member since May 2011
3148 posts
Posted on 9/24/18 at 8:25 pm to
So if we don’t think she shows, how do we realistically see the next 10 days unfolding.
Posted by CamdenTiger
Member since Aug 2009
62362 posts
Posted on 9/24/18 at 8:27 pm to
He’s already testified it didn’t happen under oath, she has to be held to that standard.
Posted by Stuckinthe90s
Dallas, TX
Member since Apr 2013
2576 posts
Posted on 9/24/18 at 8:30 pm to
I think she doesn’t show, claims that republicans are bullying her and tries to delay the hearing. Says she will show up next week. I hope that republicans squash it and vote on Friday, I am afraid they give her one more chance for next Wednesday. Assuming they are in session, I don’t know what their calendar looks like.
Posted by Costanza
Member since May 2011
3148 posts
Posted on 9/24/18 at 8:31 pm to
Was this thread anchored? If so, why?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram