- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Oregon bill would require permits to purchase guns, limit ammo to 20 rounds per month
Posted on 1/14/19 at 12:59 pm
Posted on 1/14/19 at 12:59 pm
Among many other incredibly useless things. I almost wish a state would go ahead and pass something like this so we can get it up to SCOTUS while the numbers are in favor of people who support the Constitution.
Derp
Derp
quote:
A proposal by two Oregon lawmakers to require permits for all gunowners is generating buzz online and among Republicans at the Capitol, even before it’s scheduled to be introduced at the Legislature on Monday.
quote:
The sweeping legislation would also require people to undergo background checks before purchasing or sharing ammunition and would limit ammunition purchases to 20 rounds within a 30-day period, although people could purchase and use unlimited ammunition at shooting ranges. It would ban magazines that hold more than five rounds of ammunition. Additionally, Senate Bill 501 would require people to securely store their guns and report the loss or theft of a firearm to law enforcement within 24 hours.
25
Posted on 1/14/19 at 1:00 pm to TideCPA
Go to Idaho, purchase ammo
Posted on 1/14/19 at 1:01 pm to TideCPA
They are so trying to out-retard the king retard Cali
Posted on 1/14/19 at 1:01 pm to TideCPA
Sounds infringed upon.
Posted on 1/14/19 at 1:01 pm to TideCPA
quote:
limit ammo to 20 rounds per month
Guess they don't want their gun owners going to the range and getting proficient
Posted on 1/14/19 at 1:02 pm to TideCPA
Hell, I shot 4 boxes of shells shooting quail yesterday...
Posted on 1/14/19 at 1:04 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
Guess they don't want their gun owners going to the range and getting proficient
Hell, it takes 500 to 1000 rounds to break a gun in properly. 200 to 250 would be the absolute minimum.
Posted on 1/14/19 at 1:04 pm to TideCPA
quote:
would limit ammunition purchases to 20 rounds within a 30-day period
what in lords name?! where in the world do they get these limits from?
Posted on 1/14/19 at 1:05 pm to civiltiger07
quote:
! where in the world do they get these limits from
Their arse
Posted on 1/14/19 at 1:05 pm to TideCPA
quote:
require permits for all gunowners
A lot of hypocrisy from the "we want voter ID" crowd.
Explain how a permit to own a firearm is a bad thing?
This post was edited on 1/14/19 at 1:06 pm
Posted on 1/14/19 at 1:05 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
Guess they don't want their gun owners going to the range and getting proficient
The bill would let you buy unlimited ammo at the shooting range to use there (at 10x the price I'm sure), but only 20 rounds per month anywhere else. They should re-title this bill "Firing Range Owner Enrichment Bill of 2019".
Posted on 1/14/19 at 1:06 pm to TideCPA
They might get away with that in Portland but those mountain folk ain’t going to play that.
Posted on 1/14/19 at 1:06 pm to civiltiger07
quote:
what in lords name?! where in the world do they get these limits from?
Basing all your legislation on knee jerk reactions and feelings with a profound lack of education in the subject you're trying to legislate?
Posted on 1/14/19 at 1:07 pm to ShreveportHog94
quote:
A lot of hypocrisy from the "we want voter ID" crowd.
Well, last time I checked, you have to provide an ID in order to purchase a firearm, so I am not certain you know WTF you are comparing it to...
Now, if we wanted to require a photo ID AND a permit to vote, then you might have a point...
Posted on 1/14/19 at 1:08 pm to ShreveportHog94
quote:
Explain how a permit to own a firearm is a bad thing?
Because denying a permit would be infringement? Therefore making permits either A) emotional knee jerk reaction or B) thinly-veiled rent seeking attempt by the state or C) all of the above.
Posted on 1/14/19 at 1:08 pm to ShreveportHog94
quote:
Explain how a permit to own a firearm is a bad thing?
The purpose of the 2A (along with the other things in the BOR) is to prevent government from encroaching on the inherent rights of the individual. If you have to request express permission from the government to do something, it's no longer a right.
This post was edited on 1/14/19 at 1:09 pm
Posted on 1/14/19 at 1:09 pm to TideCPA
The press should probably be required to have permits to publish stories.
Posted on 1/14/19 at 1:09 pm to ShreveportHog94
quote:
A lot of hypocrisy from the "we want voter ID" crowd.
I've had to show ID for every firearm purchase, Cletus.
Posted on 1/14/19 at 1:10 pm to TideCPA
quote:
It would ban magazines that hold more than five rounds of ammunition.
Damn can’t even have a wheel gun
Posted on 1/14/19 at 1:11 pm to TideCPA
quote:
If you have to request express permission from the government to do something, it's not right
So this is ok when it comes to voting? Look I'm not agreeing with the bill outside the valid permit part. Just seems to be a double standard when you apply the same line of thinking to voting.
Page 1 of 19
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News